Suppr超能文献

评估宏基因组测序和 qPCR 检测牛呼吸道样本中的 D 型流感病毒。

Assessment of Metagenomic Sequencing and qPCR for Detection of Influenza D Virus in Bovine Respiratory Tract Samples.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Pathology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada.

Prairie Diagnostic Services Inc., Saskatoon, SK S7N5B4, Canada.

出版信息

Viruses. 2020 Jul 28;12(8):814. doi: 10.3390/v12080814.

Abstract

High throughput sequencing is currently revolutionizing the genomics field and providing new approaches to the detection and characterization of microorganisms. The objective of this study was to assess the detection of influenza D virus (IDV) in bovine respiratory tract samples using two sequencing platforms (MiSeq and Nanopore (GridION)), and species-specific qPCR. An IDV-specific qPCR was performed on 232 samples (116 nasal swabs and 116 tracheal washes) that had been previously subject to virome sequencing using MiSeq. Nanopore sequencing was performed on 19 samples positive for IDV by either MiSeq or qPCR. Nanopore sequence data was analyzed by two bioinformatics methods: What's In My Pot (WIMP, on the EPI2ME platform), and an in-house developed analysis pipeline. The agreement of IDV detection between qPCR and MiSeq was 82.3%, between qPCR and Nanopore was 57.9% (in-house) and 84.2% (WIMP), and between MiSeq and Nanopore was 89.5% (in-house) and 73.7% (WIMP). IDV was detected by MiSeq in 14 of 17 IDV qPCR-positive samples with Cq (cycle quantification) values below 31, despite multiplexing 50 samples for sequencing. When qPCR was regarded as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of MiSeq sequence detection were 28.3% and 98.9%, respectively. We conclude that both MiSeq and Nanopore sequencing are capable of detecting IDV in clinical specimens with a range of Cq values. Sensitivity may be further improved by optimizing sequence data analysis, improving virus enrichment, or reducing the degree of multiplexing.

摘要

高通量测序目前正在彻底改变基因组学领域,并为检测和鉴定微生物提供了新的方法。本研究旨在评估两种测序平台(MiSeq 和 Nanopore(GridION))和种特异性 qPCR 在牛呼吸道样本中检测流感 D 病毒(IDV)的效果。在使用 MiSeq 对 232 个样本(116 个鼻腔拭子和 116 个气管冲洗液)进行病毒组测序之前,对这些样本进行了 IDV 特异性 qPCR 检测。对 MiSeq 或 qPCR 检测为阳性的 19 个样本进行了 Nanopore 测序。使用两种生物信息学方法分析 Nanopore 序列数据:EPI2ME 平台上的 What's In My Pot (WIMP)和内部开发的分析管道。qPCR 与 MiSeq 之间 IDV 检测的一致性为 82.3%,qPCR 与 Nanopore 之间的一致性为 57.9%(内部)和 84.2%(WIMP),MiSeq 与 Nanopore 之间的一致性为 89.5%(内部)和 73.7%(WIMP)。尽管 MiSeq 测序将 50 个样本进行了多重化,但 MiSeq 在 17 个 IDV qPCR 阳性样本中检测到了 14 个 Cq(循环定量)值低于 31 的 IDV。当 qPCR 被视为金标准时,MiSeq 序列检测的灵敏度和特异性分别为 28.3%和 98.9%。我们得出结论,MiSeq 和 Nanopore 测序都能够在具有多种 Cq 值的临床样本中检测到 IDV。通过优化序列数据分析、提高病毒富集度或减少多重化程度,可以进一步提高灵敏度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/915d/7472010/f5d3011acc4d/viruses-12-00814-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验