Suppr超能文献

杂交手术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗多节段颈椎病的对比研究。

A comparison study between hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylosis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug;102-B(8):981-996. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1666.R1.

Abstract

AIMS

Whether to perform hybrid surgery (HS) in contrast to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) when treating patients with multilevel cervical disc degeneration remains a controversial subject. To resolve this we have undertaken a meta-analysis comparing the outcomes from HS with ACDF in this condition.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched for studies of HS and ACDF from inception of the study to 1 September 2019. Both random-effects and fixed-effects models were used to evaluate the overall effect of the C2-C7 range of motion (ROM), ROM of superior/inferior adjacent levels, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), heterotopic ossification (HO), complications, neck disability index (NDI) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Odom's criteria, blood loss, and operating and hospitalization time. To obtain more credible results contour-enhanced funnel plots, Egger's and Begg's tests, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 17 studies involving 861 patients were included in the analysis. HS was found to be superior to ACDF in maintaining C2-C7 ROM and ROM of superior/inferior adjacent levels, but HS did not reduce the incidence of associated level ASD. Also, HS did not cause a higher rate of HO than ACDF. The frequency of complications was similar between the two techniques. HS failed to achieve more favourable outcomes than ACDF using the NDI, VAS, JOA, and Odom's scores. HS did not show any more advantages in operating or hospitalization time but did show reduction in blood loss.

CONCLUSION

Although HS maintained cervical kinetics, it failed to reduce the incidence of ASD. This finding differs from previous reports. Moreover, patients did not show more benefits from HS with respect to symptom improvement, prevention of complications, and clinical outcomes. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(8):981-996.

摘要

目的

当治疗多节段颈椎间盘退变性疾病的患者时,与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)相比,是否行杂交手术(HS)仍然存在争议。为了解决这一问题,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较了 HS 与 ACDF 治疗该疾病的结果。

方法

从研究开始到 2019 年 9 月 1 日,在 7 个数据库中搜索 HS 和 ACDF 的研究。使用随机效应和固定效应模型评估 C2-C7 活动度(ROM)、上下相邻节段 ROM、邻近节段退变(ASD)、异位骨化(HO)、并发症、颈残障指数(NDI)评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、日本矫形协会(JOA)评分、Odom 标准、出血量以及手术和住院时间的总体效果。为了获得更可信的结果,进行了轮廓增强漏斗图、Egger 和 Begg 检验、meta 回归和敏感性分析。

结果

共纳入 17 项研究,包括 861 例患者。结果发现,HS 在维持 C2-C7 ROM 和上下相邻节段 ROM 方面优于 ACDF,但 HS 并未降低相关节段 ASD 的发生率。此外,HS 并未导致比 ACDF 更高的 HO 发生率。两种技术的并发症发生率相似。在 NDI、VAS、JOA 和 Odom 评分方面,HS 并未获得比 ACDF 更有利的结果。HS 在手术或住院时间方面没有显示出更多的优势,但在出血量方面确实有所减少。

结论

尽管 HS 维持了颈椎动力学,但未能降低 ASD 的发生率。这一发现与之前的报告不同。此外,患者在症状改善、并发症预防和临床结局方面并未从 HS 中获得更多益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验