• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎退行性疾病前路减压融合术中显著术中失血的危险因素。

Risk Factors for Significant Intraoperative Blood Loss during Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Diseases.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command of Chinese PLA, Shenyang, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command of Chinese PLA, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):2822-2829. doi: 10.1111/os.13886. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1111/os.13886
PMID:37712097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10622266/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACF) has become a widely accepted surgical treatment for degenerative cervical diseases, but occasionally, significant intraoperative blood loss (SIBL), which is defined as IBL of 500 mL or more, will occur. We aimed to investigate the independent risk factors for SIBL during ACF for degenerative cervical diseases.

METHODS

We enrolled 1150 patients who underwent ACF for degenerative cervical diseases at our hospital between 2013 and 2019. The patients were divided into two groups: the SIBL group (n = 38) and the non-SIBL group (n = 1112). Demographic, surgical and radiographic data were recorded prospectively to investigate the independent risk factors for SIBL. For counting data, the chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test was used. Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used for comparisons between groups of measurement data. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were further used to analyze the significance of potential risk factors.

RESULTS

The incidence of SIBL during ACF was 3.3% (38/1150). A multivariate analysis revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR], 6.285; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.707-14.595; p < 0.001), corpectomy (OR, 3.872; 95% CI, 1.616-9.275; p = 0.002), duration of operation ≥150 min (OR, 8.899; 95% CI, 4.042-19.590; p < 0.001), C3 involvement (OR, 4.116; 95% CI, 1.808-9.369; p = 0.001) and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) at the surgical level (OR, 6.007; 95% CI, 2.218-16.270; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for SIBL. Patients with SIBL had more days of first-degree/intensive nursing (p = 0.003), longer length of stay (p = 0.003) and higher hospitalization costs (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Female sex, corpectomy, duration of operation, C3 involvement and OPLL at the surgical level were independent risk factors for SIBL during ACF. SIBL in ACF was associated with more days of first-degree/intensive nursing, longer length of stay and higher hospitalization costs.

摘要

目的

颈椎前路减压融合术(ACF)已成为治疗退行性颈椎疾病的广泛接受的手术治疗方法,但偶尔会发生大量术中失血(SIBL),定义为 IBL 为 500mL 或更多。我们旨在研究 ACF 治疗退行性颈椎疾病时 SIBL 的独立危险因素。

方法

我们纳入了 2013 年至 2019 年在我院接受 ACF 治疗退行性颈椎疾病的 1150 例患者。患者分为两组:SIBL 组(n=38)和非 SIBL 组(n=1112)。前瞻性记录人口统计学、手术和影像学数据,以调查 SIBL 的独立危险因素。对于计数数据,使用卡方检验或 Fisher 确切概率检验。对于组间测量数据的比较,使用学生 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney 秩和检验。进一步使用单因素分析和多因素 logistic 回归分析分析潜在危险因素的意义。

结果

ACF 中 SIBL 的发生率为 3.3%(38/1150)。多因素分析显示,女性(比值比[OR],6.285;95%置信区间[CI],2.707-14.595;p<0.001)、椎体切除术(OR,3.872;95%CI,1.616-9.275;p=0.002)、手术时间≥150min(OR,8.899;95%CI,4.042-19.590;p<0.001)、C3 受累(OR,4.116;95%CI,1.808-9.369;p=0.001)和手术节段的后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)(OR,6.007;95%CI,2.218-16.270;p<0.001)是 SIBL 的独立危险因素。SIBL 患者的一级/强化护理天数(p=0.003)、住院时间(p=0.003)和住院费用(p=0.023)更长。

结论

女性、椎体切除术、手术时间、C3 受累和手术节段的 OPLL 是 ACF 中 SIBL 的独立危险因素。ACF 中的 SIBL 与更多的一级/强化护理天数、更长的住院时间和更高的住院费用有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ca4/10622266/827ad0cd609e/OS-15-2822-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ca4/10622266/827ad0cd609e/OS-15-2822-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ca4/10622266/827ad0cd609e/OS-15-2822-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Significant Intraoperative Blood Loss during Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Diseases.颈椎退行性疾病前路减压融合术中显著术中失血的危险因素。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):2822-2829. doi: 10.1111/os.13886. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
2
Comparison of anterior corpectomy and fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.前路椎体切除融合术与椎板成形术治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Jun;40(6):E8. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS15596.
3
Risk Factors for Significant Intraoperative Blood Loss During Unilateral Expansive Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty for Cervical Compressive Myelopathy.颈椎管狭窄症单侧扩大开门式颈椎椎板成形术中严重术中失血的危险因素
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e1253-e1260. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.186. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.后纵韧带骨化症所致颈椎压迫性脊髓病前路减压融合术的手术结果及预后因素
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.028. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
5
Surgical results and complications of anterior decompression and fusion as a revision surgery after initial posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.作为后纵韧带骨化所致脊髓型颈椎病初次后路手术后翻修手术的前路减压融合术的手术结果及并发症
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Apr;26(4):466-473. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16430. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
6
Anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion as a choice for 28 patients of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with dura ossification: the risk of cerebrospinal fluid leakage compared with anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.前路可控性预牵位融合术治疗伴有硬脊膜骨化的颈椎后纵韧带骨化症 28 例:与前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术比较脑脊液漏的风险
Eur Spine J. 2019 Feb;28(2):370-379. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5813-8. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
7
Comparison of Perioperative Complications in Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Fusion for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Nation-Wide Inpatient Database.基于全国住院患者数据库的倾向性评分匹配分析:对比颈椎后纵韧带骨化症行前路减压融合术与后路减压融合术的围手术期并发症。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Aug 15;45(16):E1006-E1012. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003469.
8
Anterior decompression with fusion versus posterior decompression with fusion for massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a ≥50% canal occupying ratio: a multicenter retrospective study.前路减压融合术与后路减压融合术治疗椎管占位率≥50%的重度颈椎后纵韧带骨化症的多中心回顾性研究
Spine J. 2016 Nov;16(11):1351-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.07.532. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
9
Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine.颈椎多节段严重后纵韧带骨化的手术策略
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Feb;24(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181c7e91e.
10
Perioperative complications of anterior cervical decompression with fusion in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a retrospective, multi-institutional study.后纵韧带骨化症患者前路颈椎减压融合术的围手术期并发症:一项回顾性多机构研究
J Orthop Sci. 2012 Nov;17(6):667-72. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0271-3. Epub 2012 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术领域被引频次最高的100篇文章的文献计量分析
J Pain Res. 2022 Oct 11;15:3137-3156. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S375720. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of 4-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.对比 4 节段脊髓型颈椎病的前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与后路颈椎板切除融合术。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb;14(2):229-237. doi: 10.1111/os.13058. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
3
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Combined with Foraminotomy Assisted by High-Definition 3-Dimensional Exoscope in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy Secondary to Bony Foraminal Stenosis.
高清三维内窥镜辅助下前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合神经孔切开术治疗因骨性神经孔狭窄导致的神经根型颈椎病。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec;13(8):2318-2326. doi: 10.1111/os.13040. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
4
Establishment and Verification of a Perioperative Blood Transfusion Model After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Study Based on Data From a Local Hospital.腰椎后路椎间融合术后围手术期输血模型的建立与验证:基于当地一家医院数据的回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2021 Aug 30;8:695274. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.695274. eCollection 2021.
5
Mid- and Long-Term Follow-Up Efficacy Analysis of 3D-Printed Interbody Fusion Cages for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.3D 打印椎间融合器在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中的中远期随访疗效分析。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):1969-1978. doi: 10.1111/os.13005. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
6
Perioperative Hidden Blood Loss in Elderly Cervical Spondylosis Patients With Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion and Influencing Factors.老年颈椎病患者前路椎间盘切除融合术围手术期隐性失血及其影响因素
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Mar 31;12:21514593211002164. doi: 10.1177/21514593211002164. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion, Laminoplasty, and Laminectomy and Instrumented Fusion for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术、椎板成形术、椎板切除术与后路纵韧带骨化后路手术的有效性和安全性的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Invest Surg. 2022 Mar;35(3):667-676. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1871535. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
Influence of K-line on intraoperative and hidden blood loss in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament when undergoing unilateral open-door laminoplasty.K 线对单开门椎管扩大成形术中及隐性失血的影响:伴有后纵韧带骨化患者。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 9;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02181-9.
9
A comparison study between hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylosis.杂交手术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗多节段颈椎病的对比研究。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug;102-B(8):981-996. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1666.R1.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior decompression with fusion and posterior laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.一项比较前路减压融合术与后路椎板成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Sci. 2021 Jan;26(1):116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Mar 20.