Institute of General Practice, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 30;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01222-w.
While motives for emergency department (ED) self-referrals have been investigated in a number of studies, the relevance of general practitioner (GP) care for these patients has not been comprehensively evaluated. Respiratory symptoms constitute an important utilization trigger in both EDs and in primary care. In this qualitative study, we aimed to explore the role of GP care for patients visiting EDs as outpatients for respiratory complaints and the relevance of the relationship between patient and GP in the decision making process leading up to an ED visit.
Qualitative descriptive study. Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with a sample of 17 respiratory ED patients in Berlin, Germany. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis was performed. The study was embedded into the EMACROSS (Emergency and Acute Care for Respiratory Diseases beyond Sectoral Separation) cohort of ED patients with respiratory symptoms, which is part of EMANet (Emergency and Acute Medicine Network for Health Care Research).
Three patterns of GP utilization could be differentiated: long-term regular consulters, sporadic consulters and patients without GP. In sporadic consulters and patients without GP, an ambivalent or even aversive view of GP care was prevalent, with lack of confidence in GPs' competence and a deficit in trust as seemingly relevant influencing factors. Regardless of utilization or relationship type, patients frequently made contact with a GP before visiting an ED.
With regard to respiratory symptoms, our qualitative data suggest a hypothesis of limited relevance of patients' primary care utilization pattern and GP-patient relationship for ED consultation decisions.
虽然已有多项研究调查了急诊科(ED)患者自行转诊的动机,但全科医生(GP)对这些患者的治疗的相关性尚未得到全面评估。呼吸系统症状是 ED 和初级保健中重要的就诊触发因素。在这项定性研究中,我们旨在探讨 GP 对因呼吸系统症状作为门诊患者前往 ED 的患者的治疗作用,以及患者与 GP 之间的关系在导致 ED 就诊的决策过程中的相关性。
定性描述性研究。对德国柏林的 17 名呼吸系统 ED 患者进行了半结构化、面对面的访谈。访谈进行了录音并逐字记录。进行了定性内容分析。该研究纳入了 EMACROSS(超越部门分隔的急诊和急性呼吸系统疾病治疗)呼吸系统症状 ED 患者队列,该研究是 EMANet(急诊和急性医学网络健康研究)的一部分。
可以区分出三种 GP 利用模式:长期定期就诊者、偶发性就诊者和无 GP 就诊者。在偶发性就诊者和无 GP 就诊者中,对 GP 治疗的看法普遍存在矛盾甚至厌恶,对 GP 能力缺乏信心,信任度不足似乎是相关的影响因素。无论利用与否或关系类型如何,患者在前往 ED 之前经常与 GP 联系。
就呼吸系统症状而言,我们的定性数据提出了一个假设,即患者的初级保健利用模式和 GP-患者关系对 ED 就诊决策的相关性有限。