• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在德国急诊科常规临床信息记录中识别低危就诊。

Identification of low-acuity attendances in routine clinical information documented in German Emergency Departments.

机构信息

Emergency and Acute Medicine (CVK, CCM), Health Services Research in Emergency and Acute Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 6;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00838-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-023-00838-2
PMID:37280527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10243890/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It has not yet been possible to ascertain the exact proportion, characterization or impact of low-acuity emergency department (ED) attendances on the German Health Care System since valid and robust definitions to be applied in German ED routine data are missing.

METHODS

Internationally used methods and parameters to identify low-acuity ED attendances were identified, analyzed and then applied to routine ED data from two EDs of the tertiary care hospitals Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte (CCM) and Campus Virchow (CVK).

RESULTS

Based on the three routinely available parameters disposition´, transport to the ED´ and `triage´ 33.2% (n = 30 676) out of 92 477 presentations to the two EDs of Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (CVK, CCM) in 2016 could be classified as low-acuity presentations.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a reliable and replicable means of retrospective identification and quantification of low-acuity attendances in German ED routine data. This enables both intra-national and international comparisons of figures across future studies and health care monitoring.

摘要

引言

由于缺乏适用于德国急诊常规数据的有效且可靠的定义,因此尚未能够确定低危急诊科(ED)就诊在德国卫生保健系统中的确切比例、特征或影响。

方法

确定、分析了国际上用于识别低危 ED 就诊的方法和参数,然后将其应用于柏林夏洛蒂医科大学两家三级保健医院的急诊常规数据,即夏洛蒂医科大学 Mitte 校区急诊(CCM)和夏洛蒂医科大学 Virchow 校区急诊(CVK)。

结果

根据常规可用的三个参数“处置”、“送往 ED”和“分诊”,2016 年 Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin(CVK、CCM)两家急诊就诊的 92477 例就诊中,有 33.2%(n=30676)可归类为低危就诊。

结论

本研究为德国 ED 常规数据中回顾性识别和量化低危就诊提供了一种可靠且可复制的方法。这使得未来研究和医疗保健监测中能够进行国际和国内的比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc2/10245592/7c4f1690cdb0/12873_2023_838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc2/10245592/d4f91cc3bb1c/12873_2023_838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc2/10245592/7c4f1690cdb0/12873_2023_838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc2/10245592/d4f91cc3bb1c/12873_2023_838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc2/10245592/7c4f1690cdb0/12873_2023_838_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification of low-acuity attendances in routine clinical information documented in German Emergency Departments.在德国急诊科常规临床信息记录中识别低危就诊。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 6;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00838-2.
2
Impact of a GP cooperative on lower acuity emergency department attendances.全科医生合作对低 acuity 急诊科就诊人次的影响。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Oct;27(10):770-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.072686. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
3
Characterising non-urgent users of the emergency department (ED): A retrospective analysis of routine ED data.急诊科非紧急情况就诊患者的特征分析:对急诊科常规数据的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192855. eCollection 2018.
4
Appropriateness of cases presenting in the emergency department following ambulance service secondary telephone triage: a retrospective cohort study.救护车服务二级电话分诊后在急诊科就诊病例的适宜性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 15;7(10):e016845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016845.
5
Influence of Weekday and Seasonal Trends on Urgency and In-hospital Mortality of Emergency Department Patients.工作日和季节性趋势对急诊科患者紧急情况和住院死亡率的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 25;10:711235. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.711235. eCollection 2022.
6
INDEED-Utilization and Cross-Sectoral Patterns of Care for Patients Admitted to Emergency Departments in Germany: Rationale and Study Design.德国急诊科收治患者的利用情况和跨部门护理模式:基本原理和研究设计。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 16;9:616857. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.616857. eCollection 2021.
7
Clinician consensus on "Inappropriate" presentations to the Emergency Department in the Better Data, Better Planning (BDBP) census: a cross-sectional multi-centre study of emergency department utilisation in Ireland.临床医生对“不合适”的急诊就诊的共识:爱尔兰急诊利用的横断面多中心研究。(Better Data, Better Planning (BDBP) 普查)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):1003. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09760-6.
8
Investigating the referral of patients with non-urgent conditions to a regional Australian emergency department: a study protocol.调查非紧急情况患者转诊至澳大利亚地区急诊科的情况:一项研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 20;18(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3411-4.
9
Presentations of children to emergency departments across Europe and the COVID-19 pandemic: A multinational observational study.欧洲各急诊部接诊的儿童情况及 COVID-19 大流行:一项跨国观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Aug 26;19(8):e1003974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003974. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient navigation in German emergency care (NODE). Study protocol of a multi-center mixed-methods trial.德国急诊护理中的患者导航(NODE)。一项多中心混合方法试验的研究方案。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Aug 26;5:1524552. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1524552. eCollection 2025.
2
Low health literacy is associated with patient-clinician discrepancy in the perceived severity of medical emergencies.健康素养低下与患者和临床医生在医疗紧急情况严重程度认知上的差异有关。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 26;13:1656755. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1656755. eCollection 2025.
3
Reasons for emergency department use of low-acuity attender: results from the prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional EPICS-9/PiNo-Bund study.

本文引用的文献

1
Overcoming terminological inconsistency in the study of emergency department attendees who do not require clinically defined emergency care.克服在急诊科就诊但不需要临床定义的紧急护理的患者研究中的术语不一致问题。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 1;29(6):395-396. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000981. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
2
German emergency department measures in 2018: a status quo based on the Utstein reporting standard.2018 年德国急诊科措施:基于 Utstein 报告标准的现状。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 11;22(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00563-8.
3
Improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue-a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ACD study (Accountable Care in Germany).
急诊科使用低 acuity 就诊者的原因:前瞻性、多中心、横断面 EPICS-9/PiNo-Bund 研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):e090681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090681.
4
Frequency, demographics, diagnoses and consultation patterns associated with low-acuity attendances in German emergency departments: a retrospective routine healthcare data analysis from the INDEED project.德国急诊科低急症就诊的频率、人口统计学特征、诊断及会诊模式:一项来自INDEED项目的回顾性常规医疗数据分析
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e084986. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084986.
5
Effects of Different SARS-CoV-2 Testing Strategies in the Emergency Department on Length of Stay and Clinical Outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Trial.急诊科不同的新型冠状病毒2检测策略对住院时间和临床结局的影响:一项随机对照试验
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2024 Feb 14;2024:9571236. doi: 10.1155/2024/9571236. eCollection 2024.
通过反馈和促进对话提高门诊医疗的连续性和协调性——一项评估 ACD 研究(德国责任医疗)的整群随机试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Sep 15;22(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05584-z.
4
Exploring the factors associated with non-urgent emergency department utilisation for mental health care.探索与非紧急情况下急诊科用于精神卫生保健相关的因素。
J Res Nurs. 2019 Dec;24(8):663-674. doi: 10.1177/1744987119845020. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
5
Barriers to Integration of Primary Care into Emergency Care: Experiences in Germany.将初级保健纳入急诊护理的障碍:德国的经验
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Apr 26;21(2):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5442.
6
Low-acuity emergency department use among patients in different primary care models in Hamilton and Ontario.在汉密尔顿和安大略省不同初级保健模式下的患者中,低 acuity 急诊部门的使用情况。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2021 Jul;34(4):234-239. doi: 10.1177/08404704211012027. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
Advanced triage to redirect non-urgent Emergency Department visits to alternative care centers: the PERSEE algorithm.将非紧急的急诊科就诊患者转诊至替代护理中心的高级分诊:PERSEE算法
Acta Clin Belg. 2022 Jun;77(3):571-578. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2021.1914948. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
8
Differential trends of admissions in accident and emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.德国 COVID-19 大流行期间急诊部门入院人数的差异趋势。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Apr 6;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00436-0.
9
[AKTIN - The German Emergency Department Data Registry - real-time data from emergency medicine : Implementation and first results from 15 emergency departments with focus on Federal Joint Committee's guidelines on acuity assessment].[德国急诊科数据登记处(AKTIN)——来自急诊医学的实时数据:15个急诊科的实施情况及初步结果,重点关注联邦联合委员会的 acuity 评估指南]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022 Feb;117(1):24-33. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00764-2. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
10
Self-referred walk-in patients in the emergency department - who and why? Consultation determinants in a multicenter study of respiratory patients in Berlin, Germany.自行来急诊科就诊的患者——他们是谁,为什么要来?德国柏林一项关于呼吸科患者的多中心研究中的会诊决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05689-2.