• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科患者主观感知的治疗紧迫性是否与自我报告的健康素养和愿意使用全科医生作为治疗协调员相关?来自多中心、横断面、观察性研究 PiNo Bund 的结果。

Is subjectively perceived treatment urgency of patients in emergency departments associated with self-reported health literacy and the willingness to use the GP as coordinator of treatment? Results from the multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study PiNo Bund.

机构信息

Department of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Department of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 24;11(11):e053110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053110.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053110
PMID:34819288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8614139/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Aim of this study was to analyse if subjectively perceived treatment urgency of patients in emergency departments is associated with self-reported health literacy and the willingness to use the general practitioner (GP) as coordinator of treatment.

DESIGN

A multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study.

SETTING

Emergency departments in five hospitals. Each hospital was visited 14 times representing two 8-hour shifts on each day of the week. Calendar dates were randomly assigned.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients of legal age registered at the emergency department or hospital reception desk. Exclusion criteria included immediate or very urgent need of treatment, high level of symptom burden and severe functional impairments in terms of hearing, vision and speech. We conducted standardised personal interviews. Additionally, clinical data were extracted from patient records.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Our target variable was subjectively perceived treatment urgency. Predictor variables included age, sex, education, health-related quality of life (EuroQol Five-Dimension Scale, value set UK), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), somatic symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire, 15 items version), self-reported health literacy (European Health Literacy Questionnaire, 16 questions version) and the commitment to the GP (Fragebogen zur Intensität der Hausarztbindung, 'F-HaBi'). Data were analysed by multilevel, multivariable linear regression adjusted for random effects at the hospital level.

RESULTS

Our sample comprised 276 patients with a mean age of 50.1 years and 51.8% women. A low treatment urgency (defined as 0-5 points on a Numerical Rating Scale) was reported by 111 patients (40.2%). In the final model, lower subjective treatment urgency was associated with male sex (β=0.84; 95% CI 0.11/1.57, p=0.024), higher health-related quality of life (-2.27 to -3.39/-1.15, p<0.001), lower somatic symptoms score (0.09, 0.004/0.17, p=0.040), higher anxiety score (-0.13 to -0.24/-0.01, p=0.027) and lower commitment to the GP (0.08, 0.01/0.14, p=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower level of subjectively perceived treatment urgency was predicted by a lower willingness to use the GP as coordinator of treatment. Self-reported health literacy did not predict the patients' urgency rating.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析急诊科患者主观感知的治疗紧迫性是否与自我报告的健康素养以及愿意将全科医生(GP)作为治疗协调者相关。

设计

多中心、横断面、观察性研究。

地点

五家医院的急诊科。每家医院各进行 14 次访问,每周每天进行两次 8 小时轮班。日历日期随机分配。

参与者

在急诊科或医院接待处登记的所有法定年龄的患者。排除标准包括立即或非常需要治疗、症状负担高和听力、视力和言语严重功能障碍。我们进行了标准化的个人访谈。此外,还从患者记录中提取了临床数据。

主要和次要结局测量

我们的目标变量是主观感知的治疗紧迫性。预测变量包括年龄、性别、教育程度、健康相关生活质量(欧洲五维健康量表,英国值集)、焦虑和抑郁(医院焦虑和抑郁量表)、躯体症状(患者健康问卷,15 项版本)、自我报告的健康素养(欧洲健康素养问卷,16 题版本)和对全科医生的承诺(Fragebogen zur Intensität der Hausarztbindung,'F-HaBi')。数据通过多水平、多变量线性回归进行分析,并调整了医院水平的随机效应。

结果

我们的样本包括 276 名平均年龄为 50.1 岁、51.8%为女性的患者。111 名患者(40.2%)报告治疗紧迫性较低(数字评分量表 0-5 分)。在最终模型中,较低的主观治疗紧迫性与男性(β=0.84;95%CI 0.11/1.57,p=0.024)、较高的健康相关生活质量(-2.27 至-3.39/-1.15,p<0.001)、较低的躯体症状评分(0.09,0.004/0.17,p=0.040)、较高的焦虑评分(-0.13 至-0.24/-0.01,p=0.027)和较低的对全科医生的承诺(0.08,0.01/0.14,p=0.029)相关。

结论

较低的主观治疗紧迫性预测了患者对使用全科医生作为治疗协调者的意愿较低。自我报告的健康素养并不能预测患者的紧急程度评分。

相似文献

1
Is subjectively perceived treatment urgency of patients in emergency departments associated with self-reported health literacy and the willingness to use the GP as coordinator of treatment? Results from the multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study PiNo Bund.急诊科患者主观感知的治疗紧迫性是否与自我报告的健康素养和愿意使用全科医生作为治疗协调员相关?来自多中心、横断面、观察性研究 PiNo Bund 的结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 24;11(11):e053110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053110.
2
[Health literacy and commitment to a general practitioner in low-acuity patients of emergency departments: results of the PiNo observational study in Northern Germany].[急诊低 acuity 患者的健康素养与对全科医生的依从性:德国北部 PiNo 观察性研究结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Dec;175:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
3
Compliance and patient satisfaction with treatment settings recommended by the medical on-call service 116117 in Germany using computer-assisted structured initial assessment: a cross-sectional observational study accompanying the demand intervention.德国医疗值班服务 116117 推荐的治疗环境的依从性和患者满意度:使用计算机辅助结构化初始评估的伴随需求干预的横断面观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 9;13(5):e070475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070475.
4
Regional and patient-related factors influencing the willingness to use general practitioners as coordinators of the treatment in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study.影响德国北部患者和地区因素对使用全科医生作为治疗协调者的意愿——一项横断面观察性研究的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 17;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01180-3.
5
Asylum Seekers and Swiss Nationals with Low-Acuity Complaints: Disparities in the Perceived level of Urgency, Health Literacy and Ability to Communicate-A Cross-Sectional Survey at a Tertiary Emergency Department.寻求庇护者和瑞士低 acuity 抱怨国民:在感知紧迫性,健康素养和沟通能力的差异 - 在一家三级急诊部门的横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 17;17(8):2769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082769.
6
Patients Attending Emergency Departments.急诊患者。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Sep 29;114(39):645-652. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0645.
7
Factors associated with health literacy in multimorbid patients in primary care: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland.初级保健中多病患者健康素养的相关因素:瑞士的一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 13;8(2):e018281. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018281.
8
Patient satisfaction with computer-assisted structured initial assessment facilitating patient streaming to emergency departments and primary care practices: results from a cross-sectional observational study accompanying the DEMAND intervention in Germany.患者对计算机辅助结构化初始评估促进患者流向急诊科和初级保健实践的满意度:德国 DEMAND 干预伴随的横断面观察性研究结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Aug 23;23(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01825-5.
9
The Prevalence of patients with panic attacks (PAs) and panic disorder (PD) visiting Emergency Departments of the Verona Hospital.维罗纳医院急诊科中惊恐发作(PA)和惊恐障碍(PD)患者的患病率。
Ann Ig. 2019 Mar-Apr;31(2):93-108. doi: 10.7416/ai.2019.2262.
10
General practitioners' predictions of their own patients' health literacy: a cross-sectional study in Belgium.全科医生对其自身患者健康素养的预测:比利时的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e029357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029357.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient navigation in German emergency care (NODE). Study protocol of a multi-center mixed-methods trial.德国急诊护理中的患者导航(NODE)。一项多中心混合方法试验的研究方案。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Aug 26;5:1524552. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1524552. eCollection 2025.
2
Low health literacy is associated with patient-clinician discrepancy in the perceived severity of medical emergencies.健康素养低下与患者和临床医生在医疗紧急情况严重程度认知上的差异有关。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 26;13:1656755. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1656755. eCollection 2025.
3
Utilization of acute medical services in general practice: a retrospective routine data analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-referred walk-in patients in the emergency department - who and why? Consultation determinants in a multicenter study of respiratory patients in Berlin, Germany.自行来急诊科就诊的患者——他们是谁,为什么要来?德国柏林一项关于呼吸科患者的多中心研究中的会诊决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05689-2.
2
What role does the GP play for emergency department utilizers? A qualitative exploration of respiratory patients' perspectives in Berlin, Germany.全科医生在急诊科就诊者中扮演什么角色?德国柏林对呼吸科患者的定性探索。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 30;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01222-w.
3
全科医疗中急性医疗服务的利用情况:一项回顾性常规数据分析。
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 7;18(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00943-y.
4
Patient-reported factors associated with emergency department referrals from a co-located out-of-hours walk-in clinic in Germany: a cross-sectional observational study.德国一家位于同一地点的非工作时间随诊诊所患者报告的与急诊科转诊相关的因素:一项横断面观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 3;15(4):e094312. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094312.
5
Reasons for emergency department use of low-acuity attender: results from the prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional EPICS-9/PiNo-Bund study.急诊科使用低 acuity 就诊者的原因:前瞻性、多中心、横断面 EPICS-9/PiNo-Bund 研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):e090681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090681.
6
Patient satisfaction with computer-assisted structured initial assessment facilitating patient streaming to emergency departments and primary care practices: results from a cross-sectional observational study accompanying the DEMAND intervention in Germany.患者对计算机辅助结构化初始评估促进患者流向急诊科和初级保健实践的满意度:德国 DEMAND 干预伴随的横断面观察性研究结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Aug 23;23(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01825-5.
Beyond Access Block: Understanding the Role of Health Literacy and Self-Efficacy in Low-Acuity Emergency Department Patients.
超越就诊障碍:理解健康素养和自我效能在低急症急诊科患者中的作用
Ochsner J. 2020 Summer;20(2):161-169. doi: 10.31486/toj.19.0047.
4
Regional and patient-related factors influencing the willingness to use general practitioners as coordinators of the treatment in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study.影响德国北部患者和地区因素对使用全科医生作为治疗协调者的意愿——一项横断面观察性研究的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 17;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01180-3.
5
Study protocol for the COMET study: a cluster-randomised, prospective, parallel-group, superiority trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative and stepped care model versus treatment as usual in patients with mental disorders in primary care.COMET研究的研究方案:一项整群随机、前瞻性、平行组、优效性试验,旨在比较协作式逐步照护模式与初级保健中精神障碍患者常规治疗的有效性。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e032408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032408.
6
Rationale and Design of the Hamburg City Health Study.汉堡城市健康研究的原理和设计。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;35(2):169-181. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00577-4. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
7
The influence of health literacy on emergency department utilization and hospitalizations in adolescents with sickle cell disease.健康素养对青少年镰状细胞病患者急诊就诊和住院的影响。
Public Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;36(6):765-771. doi: 10.1111/phn.12643. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
8
Depression predicts emergency care use in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a large cohort study in primary care.抑郁症可预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的急诊就诊:初级保健中的一项大型队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jun 28;14:1343-1353. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S179109. eCollection 2019.
9
Ambulatory care-sensitive emergency department cases: a mixed methods approach to systemize and analyze cases in Germany.门诊医疗敏感型急诊病例:系统分析德国此类病例的混合方法研究
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Dec 1;29(6):1024-1030. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz081.
10
Temporal analysis of determinants for respiratory emergency department visits in a large German hospital.德国一家大型医院呼吸急诊科就诊决定因素的时间分析
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2018 Nov 1;5(1):e000338. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000338. eCollection 2018.