Suppr超能文献

标准实验室跑鞋不会降低业余跑步者的负荷率变异性。

Standardized Lab Shoes Do Not Decrease Loading Rate Variability in Recreational Runners.

作者信息

Hunter Jessica G, Smith Alexander M B, Sciarratta Lena M, Suydam Stephen, Shim Jae Kun, Miller Ross H

机构信息

University of Maryland.

Algovation, LLC.

出版信息

J Appl Biomech. 2020 Jul 30;36(5):340-344. doi: 10.1123/jab.2019-0337. Print 2020 Oct 1.

Abstract

Studies of running mechanics often use a standardized lab shoe, ostensibly to reduce variance between subjects; however, this may induce unnatural running mechanics. The purpose of this study was to compare the step rate, vertical average loading rate, and ground contact time when running in standardized lab shoes versus participants' normal running shoes. Ground reaction forces were measured while the participants ran overground in both shoe conditions at a self-selected speed. The Student's t-test revealed that the vertical average loading rate magnitude was smaller in lab shoes versus normal shoes (42.09 [11.08] vs 47.35 [10.81] body weight/s, P = .013), while the step rate (170.92 [9.43] vs 168.98 [9.63] steps/min, P = .053) and ground contact time were similar (253 [25] vs 251 [20] ms, P = .5227) and the variance of all outcomes was similar in lab shoes versus normal shoes. Our results indicate that using standardized lab shoes during testing may underestimate the loads runners actually experience during their typical mileage.

摘要

跑步力学的研究通常使用标准化的实验室跑鞋,表面上是为了减少受试者之间的差异;然而,这可能会导致不自然的跑步力学。本研究的目的是比较在标准化实验室跑鞋和参与者的普通跑鞋中跑步时的步频、垂直平均负荷率和地面接触时间。在两种鞋子条件下,参与者以自选速度在地面跑步时测量地面反作用力。学生t检验显示,与普通鞋子相比,实验室跑鞋的垂直平均负荷率幅度较小(42.09[11.08]与47.35[10.81]体重/秒,P = 0.013),而步频(170.92[9.43]与168.98[9.63]步/分钟,P = 0.053)和地面接触时间相似(253[25]与251[20]毫秒,P = 0.5227),并且实验室跑鞋和普通跑鞋中所有结果的方差相似。我们的结果表明,在测试期间使用标准化实验室跑鞋可能会低估跑步者在其典型里程中实际承受的负荷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验