Suppr超能文献

口袋创造法提高结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a system review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct 1;33(10):1241-1246. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001864.

Abstract

The pocket-creation method (PCM) is a new strategy for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this system review is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PCM-ESD compared to conventional ESD (C-ESD) for colorectal neoplasm lesions. We performed literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL database from inception to 15 February 2020. Studies provided comparison between PCM-ESD and C-ESD for colorectal neoplasm lesions were included. En bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, occurrence rate of adverse events and operation speed/time were extracted from included studies. Pooled risk difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated in meta-analysis. Three cohort studies and one randomized control trial (RCT) were included, which contained 432 colorectal lesions removed by PCM-ESD and 959 lesions resected by C-ESD. PCM-ESD achieved significantly higher en bloc/R0 resection rate than C-ESD in cohort studies with pooled risk differences of 0.05 (CI, 0.03-0.07, I2 = 34%) and 0.14 (CI, 0.04-0.24, I2 = 83%). However, comparison of en bloc/R0 resection rate between two surgery strategies could not be estimated in RCT. Pooled results in cohort studies and data from RCT revealed comparable occurrence rate of adverse events between PCM-ESD and C-ESD. Measurements and outcomes of operation time/speed varied between the included studies and no consistent conclusion could be achieved in this aspect. The results indicate that PCM-ESD is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for colorectal neoplasm lesions and may be a superior treatment to C-ESD in en bloc/R0 resection rate.

摘要

口袋创造法(PCM)是内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的一种新策略。本系统评价的目的是评估 PCM-ESD 与传统 ESD(C-ESD)治疗结直肠肿瘤病变的临床疗效和安全性。我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 数据库,检索时间截至 2020 年 2 月 15 日。纳入的研究比较了 PCM-ESD 和 C-ESD 治疗结直肠肿瘤病变。从纳入的研究中提取整块切除率、R0 切除率、不良事件发生率和手术速度/时间。采用 Meta 分析计算合并风险差及其 95%置信区间(CI)。纳入了 3 项队列研究和 1 项随机对照试验(RCT),共包含 432 例经 PCM-ESD 切除的结直肠病变和 959 例经 C-ESD 切除的病变。PCM-ESD 在队列研究中整块/RO 切除率显著高于 C-ESD,合并风险差分别为 0.05(CI:0.03-0.07,I2=34%)和 0.14(CI:0.04-0.24,I2=83%)。然而,RCT 中两种手术策略的整块/RO 切除率比较无法评估。队列研究的汇总结果和 RCT 数据表明,PCM-ESD 和 C-ESD 的不良事件发生率相似。纳入研究中手术时间/速度的测量和结果存在差异,因此在这方面无法得出一致的结论。结果表明,PCM-ESD 是一种有效且耐受良好的治疗结直肠肿瘤病变的方法,在整块/RO 切除率方面可能优于 C-ESD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验