• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口袋创造法提高结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a system review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct 1;33(10):1241-1246. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001864.

DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000001864
PMID:32732811
Abstract

The pocket-creation method (PCM) is a new strategy for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this system review is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PCM-ESD compared to conventional ESD (C-ESD) for colorectal neoplasm lesions. We performed literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL database from inception to 15 February 2020. Studies provided comparison between PCM-ESD and C-ESD for colorectal neoplasm lesions were included. En bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, occurrence rate of adverse events and operation speed/time were extracted from included studies. Pooled risk difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated in meta-analysis. Three cohort studies and one randomized control trial (RCT) were included, which contained 432 colorectal lesions removed by PCM-ESD and 959 lesions resected by C-ESD. PCM-ESD achieved significantly higher en bloc/R0 resection rate than C-ESD in cohort studies with pooled risk differences of 0.05 (CI, 0.03-0.07, I2 = 34%) and 0.14 (CI, 0.04-0.24, I2 = 83%). However, comparison of en bloc/R0 resection rate between two surgery strategies could not be estimated in RCT. Pooled results in cohort studies and data from RCT revealed comparable occurrence rate of adverse events between PCM-ESD and C-ESD. Measurements and outcomes of operation time/speed varied between the included studies and no consistent conclusion could be achieved in this aspect. The results indicate that PCM-ESD is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for colorectal neoplasm lesions and may be a superior treatment to C-ESD in en bloc/R0 resection rate.

摘要

口袋创造法(PCM)是内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的一种新策略。本系统评价的目的是评估 PCM-ESD 与传统 ESD(C-ESD)治疗结直肠肿瘤病变的临床疗效和安全性。我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 数据库,检索时间截至 2020 年 2 月 15 日。纳入的研究比较了 PCM-ESD 和 C-ESD 治疗结直肠肿瘤病变。从纳入的研究中提取整块切除率、R0 切除率、不良事件发生率和手术速度/时间。采用 Meta 分析计算合并风险差及其 95%置信区间(CI)。纳入了 3 项队列研究和 1 项随机对照试验(RCT),共包含 432 例经 PCM-ESD 切除的结直肠病变和 959 例经 C-ESD 切除的病变。PCM-ESD 在队列研究中整块/RO 切除率显著高于 C-ESD,合并风险差分别为 0.05(CI:0.03-0.07,I2=34%)和 0.14(CI:0.04-0.24,I2=83%)。然而,RCT 中两种手术策略的整块/RO 切除率比较无法评估。队列研究的汇总结果和 RCT 数据表明,PCM-ESD 和 C-ESD 的不良事件发生率相似。纳入研究中手术时间/速度的测量和结果存在差异,因此在这方面无法得出一致的结论。结果表明,PCM-ESD 是一种有效且耐受良好的治疗结直肠肿瘤病变的方法,在整块/RO 切除率方面可能优于 C-ESD。

相似文献

1
Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a system review and meta-analysis.口袋创造法提高结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct 1;33(10):1241-1246. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001864.
2
The pocket-creation method facilitates colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video).经口袋创造法辅助的结肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):1045-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysis.经内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠黏膜下肿瘤的经内镜黏膜下挖除术与传统方法的对比:一项荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 May;93(5):1038-1046.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
4
Prospective randomized trial comparing the pocket-creation method and conventional method of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.比较经肛内镜直肠黏膜下剥离术口袋法与传统方法的前瞻性随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Aug;92(2):368-379. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.034. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
5
Clinical utility of the pocket-creation method with a traction device for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.经牵引设备行口袋法在结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术中的临床应用价值。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2110-2118. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07614-4. Epub 2020 May 7.
6
Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗浅表食管肿瘤性病变的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):52-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07925-6. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
7
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Different Methods of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.不同结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术方法有效性和安全性的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Dig Dis. 2022;40(6):796-809. doi: 10.1159/000521377. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
8
Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesions.使用牵引装置的造袋方法在内镜黏膜下剥离治疗残留或复发性结直肠病变中的疗效。
Clin Endosc. 2022 Sep;55(5):655-664. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.009. Epub 2022 May 31.
9
Tunneled or pocket creation method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.隧道式或袋状创建方法与传统内镜下黏膜剥离术治疗胃病变的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jan;101(1):45-53.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.034. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
10
Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review.内镜下黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠病变:系统评价。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Aug;104:138-55. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathological features and risk factors for submucosal infiltration of colorectal lateral spreading tumors.结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤黏膜下浸润的病理特征及危险因素
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Aug 27;17(8):107230. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107230.
2
Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术的袋形创建法与传统方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Saudi Med J. 2025 May;46(5):450-458. doi: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20250045.
3
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.
内镜黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Aug 7;37(5):277-288. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770941. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Outcomes of the Conventional versus Pocket-Creation Method for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Body Tumors Using a Dual Knife: A Retrospective Study.双刀内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃体肿瘤的传统法与袋刀法的疗效比较:一项回顾性研究。
Gut Liver. 2023 Jul 15;17(4):547-557. doi: 10.5009/gnl220226. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
5
Efficacy and safety of pocket-creation method for early gastric cancers.早期胃癌袋状创建方法的疗效与安全性
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1581-1592. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09620-0. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
6
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在日本人群中使用造袋法进行内镜黏膜下剥离术的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):E694-E702. doi: 10.1055/a-1789-0548. eCollection 2022 May.