• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《卡尔法听觉过敏问卷》的土耳其语改编版

Turkish Adaptation of Khalfa Hyperacusis Questionnaire.

作者信息

Erinc Murat, Derinsu Ufuk

机构信息

Istanbul Medeniyet University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Marmara University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Audiology, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Medeni Med J. 2020;35(2):142-150. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2020.97947. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

DOI:10.5222/MMJ.2020.97947
PMID:32733764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7384510/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to adapt Khalfa Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ) into Turkish for the use in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hyperacusis.

METHOD

HQ and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were administered to a total of 529 participants (320 female, 209 male), aged 18 to 73 (mean age: 29.76±10.59) years who were randomly selected from the general population. For the evaluation of the data, confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis, correlation analysis, descriptive statistics, t-test, analysis of variance, and Sidak correction test were used.

RESULTS

In the reliability analysis, the Cronbach's alpha (aC) internal consistency coefficient was found to be 0.81. Factor analysis revealed three subdimensions (attentional, social, and emotional). The total variance of these three subdimensions were 63%, and the internal consistency of the subdimensions was also high (αC >0.70). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling results indicated that three-factor solutions with 14 items met the criteria for the adequacy of fit among the Turkish patients. The mean score for hyperacusis was estimated as 15.69±6.63 points.There was a positive, weak, but significant association between hyperacusis and anxiety (r=0.357, p=0.01, p<0.05). The patients who were exposed to noise were found to have higher levels of hyperacusis, compared to those who were not (t=6.78, p=0.01, p<0.05). The patients who had decreased noise tolerance over time were found to be higher hyperacusis levels than those without (t=4.83, p=0.01, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on these measurements, 14 questions and three-factor solutions were found to be a valid and reliable tool.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在将卡尔法听觉过敏问卷(HQ)改编为土耳其语版本,用于听觉过敏患者的诊断和治疗。

方法

对从普通人群中随机选取的529名参与者(320名女性,209名男性)进行HQ和贝克焦虑量表(BAI)测试,参与者年龄在18至73岁之间(平均年龄:29.76±10.59岁)。在数据评估中,使用了验证性和探索性因素分析、相关性分析、描述性统计、t检验、方差分析和西德克校正检验。

结果

在信度分析中,克朗巴哈α(αC)内部一致性系数为0.81。因素分析揭示了三个子维度(注意力、社交和情绪)。这三个子维度的总方差为63%,且子维度的内部一致性也很高(αC>0.70)。验证性因素分析和结构方程建模结果表明,包含14个条目的三因素解决方案符合土耳其患者的拟合优度标准。听觉过敏的平均得分为15.69±6.63分。听觉过敏与焦虑之间存在正相关,虽较弱但具有显著性(r=0.357,p=0.01,p<0.05)。与未接触噪声的患者相比,接触噪声的患者听觉过敏水平更高(t=6.78,p=0.01,p<0.05)。随着时间推移噪声耐受性下降的患者,其听觉过敏水平高于未下降的患者(t=4.83,p=0.01,p<0.05)。

结论

基于这些测量结果,发现14个问题和三因素解决方案是一个有效且可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Turkish Adaptation of Khalfa Hyperacusis Questionnaire.《卡尔法听觉过敏问卷》的土耳其语改编版
Medeni Med J. 2020;35(2):142-150. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2020.97947. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Cut-off score of the Khalfa Hyperacusis Questionnaire with 10 selected items.包含10个选定条目的卡尔法听觉过敏问卷的截断分数。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Mar;61(3):245-250. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1894491. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
Validity of the Italian version of Khalfa's questionnaire on hyperacusis.卡尔法关于听觉过敏问卷意大利语版本的效度
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015 Apr;35(2):110-5.
4
Assessment of Reduced Tolerance to Sound (Hyperacusis) in University Students.大学生对声音耐受性降低(听觉过敏)的评估。
Noise Health. 2017 Mar-Apr;19(87):73-78. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_54_16.
5
Validation of Persian Version of Hyperacusis Questionnaire.验证超敏反应问卷的波斯语版本。
Noise Health. 2022 Jul-Sep;24(114):191-197. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_16_22.
6
Development and validation of a paediatric version of the Khalfa Hyperacusis Questionnaire for children with and without autism.儿童和非自闭症儿童 Khalfa 听觉过敏问卷的儿科版本的开发和验证。
Int J Audiol. 2023 Dec;62(12):1187-1195. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2113827. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
7
Internal Consistency and Convergent Validity of the Inventory of Hyperacusis Symptoms.耳鸣症状量表的内部一致性和聚合效度。
Ear Hear. 2021 July/Aug;42(4):917-926. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000982.
8
Noise sensitivity or hyperacusis? Comparing the Weinstein and Khalfa questionnaires in a community and a clinical samples.噪声敏感或听觉过敏?在社区和临床样本中比较 Weinstein 和 Khalfa 问卷。
Hear Res. 2024 Apr;445:108992. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108992. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
9
Hyperacusis Questionnaire as a Tool for Measuring Hypersensitivity to Sound in a Tinnitus Research Population.耳鸣研究人群中作为测量声音超敏反应工具的听觉过敏问卷
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:290425. doi: 10.1155/2015/290425. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
10
Assessment of hyperacusis with a newly produced Japanese version of the Khalfa hyperacusis questionnaire.使用新制作的日语版卡尔法听觉过敏问卷评估听觉过敏
Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Sep;137(9):957-961. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1306654. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Malay translation, adaptation, and validation of the pediatric Khalfa Hyperacusis Questionnaire for children with autism spectrum disorder.针对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的小儿卡尔法听觉过敏问卷的马来语翻译、改编及验证。
Noise Health. 2025;27(125):168-178. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_149_24. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
Investigation of the relationship between hyperacusis and auditory processing difficulties in individuals with normal hearing.正常听力个体的听觉过敏与听觉处理困难之间关系的研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jan;281(1):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08269-2. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
3
Validation of Persian Version of Hyperacusis Questionnaire.验证超敏反应问卷的波斯语版本。
Noise Health. 2022 Jul-Sep;24(114):191-197. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_16_22.
4
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 and the Pandemic on Tinnitus Patients.新冠病毒病及其大流行对耳鸣患者的长期影响。
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 30;13:921173. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.921173. eCollection 2022.
5
The reliability and validity of decreased sound tolerance scale-screening.声敏下降量表筛查的信度和效度。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S155-S163. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Hyperacusis Questionnaire as a Tool for Measuring Hypersensitivity to Sound in a Tinnitus Research Population.耳鸣研究人群中作为测量声音超敏反应工具的听觉过敏问卷
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:290425. doi: 10.1155/2015/290425. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
2
Audiometric characteristics of hyperacusis patients.听觉过敏患者的听力特征。
Front Neurol. 2015 May 15;6:105. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00105. eCollection 2015.
3
Validity of the Italian version of Khalfa's questionnaire on hyperacusis.卡尔法关于听觉过敏问卷意大利语版本的效度
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015 Apr;35(2):110-5.
4
A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part I. Definitions and manifestations.听觉过敏综述及未来方向:第一部分。定义与表现。
Am J Audiol. 2014 Dec;23(4):402-19. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJA-14-0010.
5
Psychiatric comorbidity and personality traits in patients with hyperacusis.患有听觉过敏症患者的精神共病和人格特征。
Int J Audiol. 2013 Apr;52(4):230-5. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.743043. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
6
Self-reported and behavioral sound avoidance in tinnitus and hyperacusis subjects, and association with anxiety ratings.耳鸣和听觉过敏患者的自我报告和行为性声音回避,以及与焦虑评分的关系。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Aug;51(8):611-7. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.664290. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
7
Hypersensitivity to sound in tinnitus patients: an analysis of a construct based on questionnaire and audiological data.耳鸣患者对声音的超敏反应:基于问卷和听力学数据的构建分析。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Jul;49(7):518-26. doi: 10.3109/14992021003724996.
8
Correlation between hyperacusis measurements in daily ENT practice.日常耳鼻喉科实践中的听觉过敏测量相关性。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Jan;49(1):7-13. doi: 10.3109/14992020903160868.
9
Fears, hyperacusis and musicality in Williams syndrome.威廉姆斯综合征中的恐惧、听觉过敏与音乐才能
Res Dev Disabil. 2006 Nov-Dec;27(6):668-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2005.09.002. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
10
Assessment and amelioration of hyperacusis in tinnitus patients.耳鸣患者听觉过敏的评估与改善
Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 May;125(5):503-9. doi: 10.1080/00016480510027565.