• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在印度尼西亚糖尿病和非糖尿病受试者中,即时检测与标准实验室诊断检测在糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量方面的性能比较。

Performance of Point-of-Care Testing Compared with the Standard Laboratory Diagnostic Test in the Measurement of HbA1c in Indonesian Diabetic and Nondiabetic Subjects.

作者信息

Berbudi Afiat, Rahmadika Nofri, Tjahjadi Adi Imam, Ruslami Rovina

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Parasitology Division, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.

Infectious Disease Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.

出版信息

J Diabetes Res. 2020 Jul 9;2020:2037565. doi: 10.1155/2020/2037565. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/2037565
PMID:32733964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7369652/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study is aimed at investigating if point-of-care testing for HbA1c (POCT-HbA1c) using the HemoCue® HbA1c 501 system could be an alternative method for diabetes screening and monitoring to replace the HbA1c measurement in a standard diagnostic laboratory.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study to assess the agreement between POCT and a standard laboratory measurement method for determining the level of HbA1c. . In total, 108 participants were recruited to participate in this study, consisting of 61 diabetics and 47 nondiabetics. The diabetic group comprised 37 females and 24 males, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and undergoing diabetes treatment at several community health care centres in Bandung, West Java. The nondiabetic group consisted of 15 female and 32 male patients of several community health care centres and healthy volunteers. . A venous blood sample was taken for routine HbA1c analysis by the diagnostic laboratory method. For the POCT-HbA1c, a blood sample was taken from the fingertip at the same time and analysed with the HemoCue® HbA1c 501 system. . The HbA1c results of both methods were compared and analysed with a Bland-Altman agreement plot. The sensitivity and specificity of the POCT-HbA1c data were also compared with those of the standard diagnostic results.

RESULTS

Based on the Bland-Altman plot, the HbA1c level for 100 out of 108 (92.59%) subjects analysed by the POCT-HbA1c was within the range of the 95% limit of agreement. Compared with the standard diagnostic assay, the sensitivity of the POCT-HbA1c was 97.83% and its specificity was 77.42%.

CONCLUSIONS

The high sensitivity and accuracy of POCT-HbA1c indicate that it is a potential method for diabetes screening and monitoring to replace the routine diagnostic laboratory HbA1c measurement, especially when a rapid result is required.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查使用HemoCue® HbA1c 501系统进行糖化血红蛋白即时检测(POCT-HbA1c)是否可作为糖尿病筛查和监测的替代方法,以取代标准诊断实验室中的糖化血红蛋白测量。

设计

这是一项横断面研究,旨在评估POCT与用于测定糖化血红蛋白水平的标准实验室测量方法之间的一致性。总共招募了108名参与者参与本研究,其中包括61名糖尿病患者和47名非糖尿病患者。糖尿病组包括37名女性和24名男性,被诊断为2型糖尿病(DM),并在西爪哇万隆的几个社区卫生保健中心接受糖尿病治疗。非糖尿病组由几个社区卫生保健中心的15名女性和32名男性患者以及健康志愿者组成。通过诊断实验室方法采集静脉血样进行常规糖化血红蛋白分析。对于POCT-HbA1c,同时从指尖采集血样,并使用HemoCue® HbA1c 501系统进行分析。两种方法的糖化血红蛋白结果通过Bland-Altman一致性图进行比较和分析。还将POCT-HbA1c数据的敏感性和特异性与标准诊断结果的敏感性和特异性进行了比较。

结果

根据Bland-Altman图,通过POCT-HbA1c分析的108名受试者中有100名(92.59%)的糖化血红蛋白水平在95%一致性界限范围内。与标准诊断测定相比,POCT-HbA1c的敏感性为97.83%,特异性为77.42%。

结论

POCT-HbA1c的高敏感性和准确性表明,它是一种用于糖尿病筛查和监测的潜在方法,可取代常规诊断实验室的糖化血红蛋白测量,特别是在需要快速结果时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12e1/7369652/473532c8916c/JDR2020-2037565.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12e1/7369652/473532c8916c/JDR2020-2037565.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12e1/7369652/473532c8916c/JDR2020-2037565.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of Point-of-Care Testing Compared with the Standard Laboratory Diagnostic Test in the Measurement of HbA1c in Indonesian Diabetic and Nondiabetic Subjects.在印度尼西亚糖尿病和非糖尿病受试者中,即时检测与标准实验室诊断检测在糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量方面的性能比较。
J Diabetes Res. 2020 Jul 9;2020:2037565. doi: 10.1155/2020/2037565. eCollection 2020.
2
Variation in Point-of-Care Testing of HbA1c in Diabetes Care in General Practice.在一般实践中糖尿病护理中即时 HbA1c 检测的变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 9;14(11):1363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111363.
3
Level of Agreement and Correlation Between the Estimated Hemoglobin A1c Results Derived by Continuous or Conventional Glucose Monitoring Systems Compared with the Point-of-Care or Laboratory-Based Measurements: An Observational Study.连续或传统血糖监测系统得出的估计糖化血红蛋白结果与即时检测或实验室检测结果之间的一致性水平和相关性:一项观察性研究。
Diabetes Ther. 2022 May;13(5):953-967. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01240-0. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
4
Point-of-care Testing HbA1c screening for type 2 diabetes in urban and rural areas of China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.即时检测 HbA1c 在中国城乡地区筛查 2 型糖尿病的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 30;12:1438945. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438945. eCollection 2024.
5
Concordance of three point of care testing devices with clinical chemistry laboratory standard assays and patient-reported outcomes of blood sampling methods.三种即时检测设备与临床化学实验室标准检测方法及患者采血方法报告结果的一致性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01999-z.
6
HbA-testing: Evaluation of two point-of-care analysers.糖化血红蛋白检测:两种即时检验分析仪的评估
Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Dec;13(6):583-587. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
7
Assessment of a glycated hemoglobin point-of-care analyzer (A1CNow+) in comparison with an immunoturbidimetric method: a diagnostic accuracy study.糖化血红蛋白即时检验分析仪(A1CNow+)与免疫比浊法的比较评估:一项诊断准确性研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2015 Nov-Dec;133(6):460-4. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2013.9110911. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
8
Validation of an electrochemical sensor based on gold nanoparticles as a point-of-care test for quantitative determination of glycated hemoglobin.基于金纳米粒子的电化学传感器用于糖化血红蛋白定量测定的现场检测验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0276949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276949. eCollection 2023.
9
[Diagnostic agreement between two glycosylated a1b hemoglobin methods in Primary Care].[基层医疗中两种糖化血红蛋白检测方法的诊断一致性]
Semergen. 2014 Nov-Dec;40(8):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
10
Implementation of POCT in the diabetic clinic in a large hospital.大型医院糖尿病门诊即时检验的实施情况。
Afr Health Sci. 2015 Sep;15(3):902-7. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i3.26.

引用本文的文献

1
Choosing wisely: Improving decision-making for deployment of diagnostics in primary care settings.明智选择:改善基层医疗环境中诊断方法应用的决策制定。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 May;14(5):1769-1780. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1455_24. Epub 2025 May 31.
2
A Comparative Evaluation of Point-of-Care and Laboratory HbA1c Testing in Diabetes Care: An Indian Perspective.糖尿病护理中即时检测与实验室糖化血红蛋白检测的比较评估:印度视角
Cureus. 2024 Sep 22;16(9):e69956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69956. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
A Comparative Evaluation of HbA1c Measurement Methods and Their Implications for Diabetes Management.

本文引用的文献

1
Type 2 Diabetes and its Impact on the Immune System.2型糖尿病及其对免疫系统的影响。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2020;16(5):442-449. doi: 10.2174/1573399815666191024085838.
2
Glycosylation in health and disease.糖基化在健康和疾病中的作用。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Jun;15(6):346-366. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0129-4.
3
Sustained high glucose exposure sensitizes macrophage responses to cytokine stimuli but reduces their phagocytic activity.持续的高葡萄糖暴露会使巨噬细胞对细胞因子刺激的反应变得敏感,但会降低其吞噬活性。
糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测方法的比较评估及其对糖尿病管理的意义
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 15;13(22):3449. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223449.
4
Comparison of Point-of-Care and Laboratory Glycated Hemoglobin A1c and Its Relationship to Time-in-Range and Glucose Variability: A Real-World Study.即时检测与实验室糖化血红蛋白A1c的比较及其与血糖达标时间和血糖变异性的关系:一项真实世界研究
Cureus. 2023 Jan 5;15(1):e33416. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33416. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Level of Agreement and Correlation Between the Estimated Hemoglobin A1c Results Derived by Continuous or Conventional Glucose Monitoring Systems Compared with the Point-of-Care or Laboratory-Based Measurements: An Observational Study.连续或传统血糖监测系统得出的估计糖化血红蛋白结果与即时检测或实验室检测结果之间的一致性水平和相关性:一项观察性研究。
Diabetes Ther. 2022 May;13(5):953-967. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01240-0. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
6
Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Tests Measuring Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) for Glycemic Control: A Field Study in India.即时检测糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)用于血糖控制的诊断准确性:印度的一项现场研究。
Cureus. 2021 Sep 13;13(9):e17920. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17920. eCollection 2021 Sep.
BMC Immunol. 2018 Jul 11;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12865-018-0261-0.
4
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S13-S27. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S002.
5
Using glycated haemoglobin testing to simplify diabetes screening in remote Aboriginal Australian health care settings.利用糖化血红蛋白检测简化偏远地区澳大利亚原住民医疗保健环境中的糖尿病筛查。
Med J Aust. 2015 Jul 6;203(1):28-32. doi: 10.5694/mja14.01575.
6
Early Detection and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Reduce Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality: A Simulation of the Results of the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People With Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION-Europe).2型糖尿病的早期检测与治疗可降低心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率:对初级保健中筛查发现的糖尿病患者强化治疗的英-丹-荷研究(ADDITION-欧洲)结果的模拟分析
Diabetes Care. 2015 Aug;38(8):1449-55. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2459. Epub 2015 May 18.
7
Three of 7 hemoglobin A1c point-of-care instruments do not meet generally accepted analytical performance criteria.7 种即时血红蛋白 A1c 检测仪器中有 3 种不符合公认的分析性能标准。
Clin Chem. 2014 Aug;60(8):1062-72. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.224311. Epub 2014 May 27.
8
Challenges in diabetes management in Indonesia: a literature review.印度尼西亚糖尿病管理面临的挑战:文献综述。
Global Health. 2013 Dec 3;9:63. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-63.
9
Accuracy and clinical utility of a point-of-care HbA1c testing device.即时 HbA1c 检测设备的准确性和临床实用性。
Postgrad Med. 2013 May;125(3):91-8. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.05.2664.
10
Skin and soft tissue infections and associated complications among commercially insured patients aged 0-64 years with and without diabetes in the U.S.美国 0-64 岁有/无糖尿病的商业保险患者的皮肤和软组织感染及相关并发症
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 10;8(4):e60057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060057. Print 2013.