van Hoek Ingrid, Payne Jessie Rose, Feugier Alexandre, Connolly David J
Royal Canin SAS. 650, Avenue de la petite Camargue, Aimargues 30470, France.
Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Vet Anim Sci. 2018 Apr 5;5:44-46. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2018.03.002. eCollection 2018 Jun.
A high degree of accuracy is required when using echocardiography to diagnose hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in cats, as variation in measurements of 0.5 mm may affect classification of individuals as 'abnormal'. This study in adult cats examined at different time points inter-observer variability between two Board certified echocardiographers in veterinary cardiology. Twenty-four female European shorthair cats were examined at 12, 18 and 24 months of age by observer 1. Two dimensional (2D) echocardiographic images were collected in conscious cats to measure left ventricular, aortic and left atrial dimensions. Measurements were repeated by observer 2 on stored images, and analysed for effect of time, observer and time-observer interaction. Based on end-diastolic left ventricular wall thickness, cats were diagnosed as 'normal' or 'abnormal'. Linear mixed models (generalized when appropriate) were performed. A significant difference between observers was found for all septal (IVSd) and free wall (LVFWd) thickness measurements and left ventricular internal diameters but not for aortic or left atrial measurements. All measurement coefficients of variation (CV) were < 10%. The CV for IVSd was higher than the CV for LVFWd. There was a significant effect of time on IVSd, aortic measurements and left ventricular internal diameter measurements. No significant time-observer interaction was found for any parameter. Diagnosis of cats as 'abnormal' (>5 mm in cats > 6 kg bodyweight) was significantly different between observers for IVSd but not LVFWd. Caution is warranted when diagnosing as 'abnormal' or interpreting small changes based on IVSd, due to significant inter-observer differences in this measurement.
使用超声心动图诊断猫肥厚型心肌病(HCM)时需要高度精确,因为0.5毫米的测量差异可能会影响个体是否“异常”的分类。这项针对成年猫的研究在不同时间点检查了两位兽医心脏病学委员会认证的超声心动图医生之间的观察者间变异性。观察者1在12、18和24月龄时对24只雌性欧洲短毛猫进行了检查。在清醒的猫身上采集二维(2D)超声心动图图像,以测量左心室、主动脉和左心房的尺寸。观察者2对存储的图像重复进行测量,并分析时间、观察者以及时间-观察者交互作用的影响。根据舒张末期左心室壁厚度,将猫诊断为“正常”或“异常”。进行了线性混合模型(在适当情况下进行广义化)分析。发现观察者之间在所有室间隔(IVSd)和游离壁(LVFWd)厚度测量以及左心室内径方面存在显著差异,但在主动脉或左心房测量方面没有差异。所有测量的变异系数(CV)均<10%。IVSd的CV高于LVFWd的CV。时间对IVSd、主动脉测量和左心室内径测量有显著影响。未发现任何参数存在显著的时间-观察者交互作用。对于IVSd,观察者之间将猫诊断为“异常”(体重>6千克的猫>5毫米)存在显著差异,但LVFWd不存在。由于该测量中观察者间存在显著差异,因此在诊断为“异常”或基于IVSd解释微小变化时应谨慎。