• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

软组织肉瘤意外切除对皮肤缺损和重建手术的影响。

Effect of unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas on skin defects and reconstructive procedures.

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020 Dec;54(6):372-376. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1799817. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1080/2000656X.2020.1799817
PMID:32734802
Abstract

Unplanned excision (UE) is defined as a procedure wherein a surgeon operates a tumor resection without appropriate preoperative diagnostic modalities and without the intent to achieve tumor-free margins. Generally, the reconstruction rate after UE is higher than that after planned excision (PE). The present study aimed to investigate how the reconstructive procedure and size of skin defect could be influenced. We reviewed the cases of 442 patients who underwent the resection of soft tissue sarcoma. Patients were stratified into two groups (UE vs. PE). We compared the histologic grade, skin defect, reconstructive procedures, depth of the reconstruction layer. For superficial reconstructions, we also compared procedures involving skin graft-only or flap. 105 cases (23.8%) were UE. Histologic grade in PE was significantly higher ( = .024). The reconstruction rate and size of skin defect in UE was significantly higher (76.2% vs. 27.3%,  < .001) and larger (124.5 cm vs. 65.7 cm,  < .001). The rate of deep layer reconstruction was significantly higher in PE (7.5% vs. 26.1%,  = .001). In superficial reconstructions, 18 (24.3%) skin graft-only procedures were performed in UE and 15 (22.1%) in PE, all other superficial reconstructive procedures involved flap, and there was no significant difference ( = .45). Skin defects were 1.9 times larger after UE than PE. UE did not affect the superficial reconstructive procedure.

摘要

非计划性切除(UE)是指外科医生在没有适当的术前诊断手段且没有达到无肿瘤切缘的意图的情况下进行肿瘤切除术。一般来说,UE 后的重建率高于计划性切除(PE)后的重建率。本研究旨在探讨重建手术和皮肤缺损大小如何受到影响。我们回顾了 442 例软组织肉瘤切除术患者的病例。患者分为两组(UE 与 PE)。我们比较了组织学分级、皮肤缺损、重建手术、重建层深度。对于浅表重建,我们还比较了仅皮片移植或皮瓣的手术。105 例(23.8%)为 UE。PE 中的组织学分级显著更高(=.024)。UE 中的重建率和皮肤缺损大小显著更高(76.2%与 27.3%,  < .001)且更大(124.5 cm 与 65.7 cm,  < .001)。PE 中的深层重建率显著更高(7.5%与 26.1%,  = .001)。在浅表重建中,UE 中有 18 例(24.3%)行单纯皮片移植术,PE 中有 15 例(22.1%),所有其他浅表重建手术均涉及皮瓣,无显著差异( = .45)。UE 后的皮肤缺损比 PE 大 1.9 倍。UE 不影响浅表重建手术。

相似文献

1
Effect of unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcomas on skin defects and reconstructive procedures.软组织肉瘤意外切除对皮肤缺损和重建手术的影响。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020 Dec;54(6):372-376. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1799817. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
2
A comparison of clinical outcomes between additional excision after unplanned and planned excisions in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma of the limb : a propensity matching cohort study.肢体软组织肉瘤患者计划性和非计划性切除术后再次切除的临床结局比较:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Dec;103-B(12):1809-1814. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B12.BJJ-2021-0037.R1.
3
Oncological and functional outcomes of planned and unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma: A retrospective study.软组织肉瘤计划性切除与非计划性切除的肿瘤学及功能结局:一项回顾性研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2023 Jul;28(4):867-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
4
Propeller flap reconstruction of irradiated sarcoma defects: A comparison.螺旋桨皮瓣重建放射性肉瘤缺损:比较。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Feb;72(2):181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
5
The impact of unplanned excisions of truncal/extremity soft tissue sarcomas: A multi-institutional propensity score analysis from the US Sarcoma Collaborative.原发/肢体软组织肉瘤的计划性切除对肿瘤学结局的影响:美国肉瘤协作组的多机构倾向评分分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;120(3):332-339. doi: 10.1002/jso.25521. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
6
Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients After Unplanned Excision.软组织肉瘤患者计划外切除后的临床结局及预后因素
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 May 25;14:1815-1824. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S364912. eCollection 2022.
7
The incidence of unplanned excision in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: Reports from the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor registry in Japan.软组织肉瘤患者计划性切缘不足的发生率:来自日本骨与软组织肿瘤登记处的报告。
J Orthop Sci. 2022 Mar;27(2):468-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
8
Reconstructive considerations in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the cheek.颊部软组织肉瘤治疗中的重建考虑因素。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2010 Apr;30(2):103-6.
9
Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities in a Low-to-Middle-Income Country.低中等收入国家四肢软组织肉瘤的意外切除。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;30(6):3681-3689. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13188-x. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
10
Influence of unplanned excisions on the outcomes of patients with stage III extremity soft-tissue sarcoma.计划性切缘外扩对 III 期肢体软组织肉瘤患者结局的影响。
Cancer. 2018 Oct 1;124(19):3868-3875. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31648. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcomas Associated with Worse Oncological Outcomes?-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.软组织肉瘤的意外切除是否与更差的肿瘤学结果相关?——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 19;16(2):443. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020443.
2
Outcome of Surgical Management of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberance: A Single-Institution Multidisciplinary Approach.隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤的手术治疗结果:单机构多学科方法
Orthop Res Rev. 2023 Nov 20;15:237-243. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S437175. eCollection 2023.
3
Clinical Effectiveness of Free Upper Arm Medial Flap in Repairing Skin and Soft Tissue Defects of the Dorsum of the Hand.
游离上臂内侧皮瓣修复手背皮肤软组织缺损的临床疗效
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jun 26;2022:7144037. doi: 10.1155/2022/7144037. eCollection 2022.
4
Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients After Unplanned Excision.软组织肉瘤患者计划外切除后的临床结局及预后因素
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 May 25;14:1815-1824. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S364912. eCollection 2022.