Suppr超能文献

制度工作以维护、修复和改进监管机制:行为者如何应对荷兰正在进行的临床试验公共监督中的外部挑战。

Institutional work to maintain, repair, and improve the regulatory regime: How actors respond to external challenges in the public supervision of ongoing clinical trials in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 31;15(7):e0236545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236545. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

National regulatory regimes for supervising ongoing clinical trials are affected by external challenges, both international, such as harmonization of EU legislation, and national, such as critical reviews of incidents. This study examines how supervisory bodies dealing with ongoing trials respond to external challenges of the past two decades and engage in institutional work to maintain, repair, or improve the Dutch regulatory regime.

METHODS

International and national regulatory documents were analyzed and interviews (n = 27) were conducted with various actors, including public supervisory bodies, hospital staff, and boards of directors.

FINDINGS

In the Netherlands, EU harmonization directed at centralizing and coordinating the regulatory regime for good clinical trial practice in Member States has paradoxically led to further fragmentation. The resulting ambiguity and inefficiency remained largely unresolved until a serious incident in a university hospital became a catalyst to clarify both the interconnected responsibilities and working relationships of various supervisory bodies. New legislation and regulatory methods were implemented, and actors outside the legislative framework became active in the field in order to strengthen supervision of ongoing trials, further multiplying yet also aligning with existing regulatory regimes.

CONCLUSIONS

Public supervision of ongoing trials is fragmented in the Netherlands because the responsibilities and resources are unevenly distributed. In countries like the Netherlands, public supervisory bodies must do a great deal of institutional work to align with new EU regulations and still safeguard their traditional regulatory mechanisms that protect human safety. However, national regulatory traditions also offer new opportunities to strengthen the quality assurance of clinical trials.

摘要

背景

监督正在进行的临床试验的国家监管制度受到外部挑战的影响,包括国际上的挑战,如欧盟立法的协调,以及国家上的挑战,如对事件的批判性审查。本研究考察了处理正在进行的试验的监管机构如何应对过去二十年的外部挑战,并进行制度工作,以维护、修复或改进荷兰监管制度。

方法

分析了国际和国家监管文件,并对各种参与者(包括公共监管机构、医院工作人员和董事会)进行了访谈(n=27)。

结果

在荷兰,欧盟的协调化旨在集中和协调成员国良好临床试验实践的监管制度,但却导致了进一步的碎片化。由此产生的模糊性和效率低下问题在很大程度上仍未得到解决,直到一家大学医院的严重事件成为了明确各种监管机构相互关联的责任和工作关系的催化剂。新的立法和监管方法得到了实施,立法框架之外的行为者也在该领域积极参与,以加强对正在进行的试验的监督,这进一步增加了监管的多样性,但也与现有的监管制度保持一致。

结论

荷兰对正在进行的试验的公共监督是碎片化的,因为责任和资源分配不均。在像荷兰这样的国家,公共监管机构必须进行大量的制度工作,以符合新的欧盟法规,并仍然保护保护人类安全的传统监管机制。然而,国家监管传统也为加强临床试验的质量保证提供了新的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f6/7394415/1179df829179/pone.0236545.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验