Tranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 14;18(9):e0291075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291075. eCollection 2023.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, two ICU triage guidelines were developed in the Netherlands-the Pandemic Guideline and the Guideline Code Black-ostensibly to tackle the threat of absolute care scarcity. Healthcare guidelines are generally based on evidence and prescribe what healthcare professionals should do in certain situations. We used the institutional work perspective, focusing on the human agency to create, maintain, and/or disrupt institutional structures, to study the development of these guidelines and observed that they did a lot more than just offering guidance to healthcare professionals. By including the Actor Network Theory (ANT) perspective on materiality's agency in our theoretical lens, we show how guidelines, as a materiality-a non-human artefact-interact with human actors and as such shape and are shaped by the social context.
17 online documents were analyzed. This analysis resulted in a timeline of events, which was used to identify key actors in the guideline development process. We included 12 purposely sampled respondents for semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were thematically coded.
During their development, the guidelines played a role in diverse forms of institutional work performed by a variety of stakeholders to: 1) strengthen the medical profession of intensivists; 2) control the medical profession; 3) gain support for the actions needed; and 4) protect the medical profession. In turn, institutional work performed by these stakeholders also shaped the guidelines, indicating the two-sidedness of the interaction between human actors and materiality in the healthcare context.
This case study shows how guidelines as a materiality and human actors interact and influence each other in multiple ways, resulting in institutional work and thus shaping two institutions: the guidelines and healthcare professions. We found that a materiality does not stand on its own but influences and shapes institutional work in relation to human actors. By studying the development, implementation, and use of the guidelines, we gained more empirical insights into the impact materiality can have on the social context of healthcare and how this can influence existing institutional environments.
在整个 COVID-19 大流行期间,荷兰制定了两项 ICU 分诊指南——大流行指南和黑色代码指南——表面上是为了应对绝对护理短缺的威胁。医疗保健指南通常基于证据,并规定了医疗保健专业人员在某些情况下应该做什么。我们使用制度工作视角,重点关注创造、维护和/或破坏制度结构的人的能动性,研究这些指南的制定,并观察到它们的作用远不止为医疗保健专业人员提供指导。通过在我们的理论视角中纳入 Actor Network Theory(ANT)关于物质能动性的观点,我们展示了指南作为一种非人类的人工制品如何与人类行为者相互作用,从而塑造和被社会背景塑造。
分析了 17 份在线文件。该分析产生了一个事件时间表,用于确定指南制定过程中的关键行为者。我们包括了 12 名有目的抽样的受访者进行半结构化访谈。访谈记录进行了主题编码。
在制定过程中,这些指南在各种利益相关者进行的不同形式的制度工作中发挥了作用,以:1)加强重症监护医生的医疗职业;2)控制医疗职业;3)为所需的行动获得支持;4)保护医疗职业。反过来,这些利益相关者进行的制度工作也塑造了指南,表明了在医疗保健背景下人类行为者和物质性之间相互作用的两面性。
本案例研究表明,指南作为一种物质性和人类行为者如何以多种方式相互作用和影响,从而导致制度工作,从而塑造了两个机构:指南和医疗保健专业。我们发现,物质性不是孤立存在的,而是与人类行为者相关联并影响制度工作。通过研究指南的制定、实施和使用,我们获得了更多关于物质性对医疗保健社会背景的影响以及这如何影响现有制度环境的经验见解。