Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Susan Leslie Clinic for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075, Bayview avenue, T2-102, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
World J Surg. 2021 Jan;45(1):197-202. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05710-z. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
The management of nodal disease remains controversial for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NETs). Debates remain regarding the therapeutic role and extent of routine lymph node dissection (LND) for localized SB-NETs, as well as the need for aggressive resection of advanced loco-regional SB-NETs with mesenteric nodal masses. This review will address these questions regarding lymph node dissection for well-differentiated WHO grade 1 and 2 SB-NETs. In general, the aggressiveness and radicality of resection should be balanced against the length of bowel resected and post-operative functional outcomes. In localized SB-NETs with clinically negative lymph nodes, a nodal harvest of ≥ 8 lymph nodes provides accurate staging, but has not been shown to confer survival benefit. For loco-regional SB-NETs with clinically positive lymph nodes identified on imaging, 4 stages of nodal extent have been described: stage 1 nodes are located near to the intestinal border, stage 2 on arterial branches close to the origin of the SMA, stage 3 along the SMA itself, and stage 4 extend in the retroperitoneum under the pancreatic neck. In SB-NETs, every attempt should be made at resection of the primary tumor and the nodal mesenteric mass for curative-intent management and to prevent debilitating complications from mesenteric fibrosis. A mesenteric-sparing approach is favored to allow for resection for complex proximal nodal masses while preserving intestinal length and function. All patients with SB-NETs with nodal mesenteric mass should be assessed by a surgeon for resection; if deemed unresectable, consideration should be given to assessment in high-volume NETs centres to confirm proximal mesenteric-sparing resection is not feasible.
对于小肠神经内分泌肿瘤(SB-NETs),淋巴结疾病的管理仍然存在争议。关于局部 SB-NETs 的常规淋巴结清扫术(LND)的治疗作用和范围,以及是否需要积极切除伴有肠系膜淋巴结转移的晚期局部区域 SB-NETs,仍存在争议。这篇综述将讨论针对分化良好的 WHO 分级 1 和 2 SB-NETs 的淋巴结清扫术的相关问题。一般来说,切除的侵袭性和彻底性应与切除的肠段长度和术后功能结果相平衡。对于临床淋巴结阴性的局部 SB-NETs,采集≥8 个淋巴结可提供准确的分期,但尚未显示可带来生存获益。对于临床影像学检查显示有阳性淋巴结的局部区域 SB-NETs,已描述了 4 个淋巴结受累程度分期:1 期淋巴结位于肠缘附近,2 期位于靠近 SMA 起始处的动脉分支,3 期位于 SMA 本身,4 期位于胰颈下的腹膜后。在 SB-NETs 中,应尽一切努力切除原发肿瘤和肠系膜淋巴结肿块,以进行治愈性治疗,并防止肠系膜纤维化导致的致残性并发症。肠系膜保留方法有利于切除复杂的近端淋巴结肿块,同时保留肠段长度和功能。所有伴有肠系膜淋巴结肿块的 SB-NETs 患者都应由外科医生评估是否可切除;如果认为不可切除,则应考虑在 NETs 中心评估是否可行近端肠系膜保留切除。