• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of the 2017 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology hypertension guideline in aged individuals.2017年美国心脏协会和美国心脏病学会高血压指南对老年人的影响。
J Hypertens. 2020 Dec;38(12):2527-2536. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002582.
2
The Association of Blood Pressure Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Guidelines and Cardiovascular Disease Risk for Middle-Aged and Elderly People in China: A Cohort Study.2017 年 ACC/AHA 指南定义的血压与中国中老年人心血管疾病风险的关联:一项队列研究。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Jul;121(7):e20230785. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230785.
3
Potential Cardiovascular Disease Events Prevented with Adoption of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline.采用 2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会血压指南可预防潜在的心血管疾病事件。
Circulation. 2019 Jan 2;139(1):24-36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035640.
4
Impact of the European and American guidelines on hypertension prevalence, treatment, and cardiometabolic goals.欧美指南对高血压患病率、治疗和心血管代谢目标的影响。
J Hypertens. 2019 Jul;37(7):1393-1400. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002065.
5
2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Treatment Guideline Recommendations and Cardiovascular Risk.2017ACC/AHA 血压治疗指南推荐及心血管风险
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 11;72(11):1187-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.074.
6
Prevalence of Hypertension, Treatment, and Blood Pressure Targets in Canada Associated With the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines.加拿大高血压的患病率、治疗方法以及与 2017 年美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会血压指南相关的血压目标。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190406. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0406.
7
Estimating the Association of the 2017 and 2014 Hypertension Guidelines With Cardiovascular Events and Deaths in US Adults: An Analysis of National Data.评估 2017 年和 2014 年高血压指南与美国成年人心血管事件和死亡的关联:基于全国数据的分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):572-581. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1240.
8
Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality in Adults Aged ≥60 Years According to Recommendations by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and American College of Physicians/American Academy of Family Physicians.根据美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会和美国医师学院/美国家庭医师学会的建议,≥60 岁成年人的心血管疾病和死亡率。
Hypertension. 2019 Feb;73(2):327-334. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12291.
9
The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guideline and Blood Pressure in Older Adults.2017 美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会高血压指南与老年人血压
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Oct;65(4):640-648. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.04.011. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
10
Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Real-world Implications of the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline.血压控制与心血管结局:2017 年 ACC/AHA 高血压指南的实际影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 3;8(1):13155. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31549-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Influencing factors of wide pulse pressure in an elderly Chinese population: A cross-sectional study.中国老年人群宽脉压的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Nov;24(11):1482-1490. doi: 10.1111/jch.14582. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
2
Body Mass Index, White Matter Hyperintensities, and Cognitive Performance in American Indians: Data from the Strong Heart Study.体质指数、脑白质高信号与美国印第安人群认知功能的关系:来自“强壮心灵研究”的数据
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Oct;10(5):2423-2433. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01421-4. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Stage 1 hypertension by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guidelines and risk of cardiovascular disease events: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population etiologic fraction of prospective cohort studies.2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会高血压指南定义的 1 期高血压与心血管疾病事件风险:系统评价、荟萃分析及前瞻性队列研究的人群病因分数估计。
J Hypertens. 2020 Apr;38(4):573-578. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002321.
2
Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Probable Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对可能发生的痴呆的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):553-561. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21442.
3
Benefits and Harms of Antihypertensive Treatment in Low-Risk Patients With Mild Hypertension.轻度高血压低危患者降压治疗的获益与危害。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1626-1634. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4684.
4
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会动脉高血压管理特别工作组和欧洲高血压学会:欧洲心脏病学会动脉高血压管理特别工作组和欧洲高血压学会。
J Hypertens. 2018 Oct;36(10):1953-2041. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001940.
5
Effect of Aspirin on Cardiovascular Events and Bleeding in the Healthy Elderly.阿司匹林对健康老年人心血管事件和出血的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 18;379(16):1509-1518. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805819. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
6
Effect of Aspirin on Disability-free Survival in the Healthy Elderly.阿司匹林对健康老年人无残疾生存的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 18;379(16):1499-1508. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800722. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
7
Potential implications of the new American hypertension guidelines in Australia.美国新高血压指南对澳大利亚的潜在影响。
Med J Aust. 2018 Aug 6;209(3):108-109. doi: 10.5694/mja18.00104.
8
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药学协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Potential US Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.2017ACC/AHA 高血压指南对美国人口的潜在影响。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):109-118. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032582. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
Association of Blood Pressure Lowering With Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Across Blood Pressure Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.降压治疗与血压水平相关的死亡率和心血管疾病的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):28-36. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6015.

2017年美国心脏协会和美国心脏病学会高血压指南对老年人的影响。

Impact of the 2017 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology hypertension guideline in aged individuals.

作者信息

Chowdhury Enayet Karim, Ernst Michael E, Nelson Mark, Margolis Karen, Beilin Lawrie J, Johnston Collin, Woods Robyn, Murray Anne, Wolfe Rory, Storey Elsdon, Shah Raj C, Lockery Jessica, Tonkin Andrew, Newman Anne, Abhayaratna Walter, Stocks Nigel, Fitzgerald Sharyn, Orchard Suzanne, Trevaks Ruth, Donnan Geoffrey, Grimm R, McNeil John, Reid Christopher M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria.

School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2020 Dec;38(12):2527-2536. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002582.

DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000002582
PMID:32740404
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8218338/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The AHA/ACC-2017 hypertension guideline recommends an age-independent target blood pressure (BP) of less than 130/80 mmHg. In an elderly cohort without established cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline, we determined the impact of this guideline on the prevalence of hypertension and associated CVD risk.

METHODS

Nineteen thousand, one hundred and fourteen participants aged at least 65 years from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study were grouped by baseline BP: 'pre-2017 hypertensive' (BP ≥140/90 mmHg and/or on antihypertensive drugs); 'reclassified hypertensive' (normotensive by pre-2017 guidelines; hypertensive by AHA/ACC-2017 guideline), and 'normotensive' (BP <130 and <80 mmHg). For each group, we evaluated CVD risk factors, predicted 10-year CVD risk using the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk equation, and reported observed CVD event rates during a median 4.7-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, 74.4% (14 213/19 114) were 'pre-2017 hypertensive'; an additional 12.3% (2354/19 114) were 'reclassified hypertensive' by the AHA/ACC-2017 guideline. Of those 'reclassified hypertensive', the majority (94.5%) met criteria for antihypertensive treatment although 29% had no other traditional CVD risk factors other than age. Further, a relatively lower mean 10-year predicted CVD risk (18% versus 26%, P < 0.001) and lower CVD rates (8.9 versus 12.1/1000 person-years, P = 0.01) were observed in 'reclassified hypertensive' compared with 'pre-2017 hypertensive'. Compared with 'normotensive', a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for CVD events of 1.60 (1.26-2.02) for 'pre-2017 hypertensive' and 1.26 (0.93-1.71) for 'reclassified hypertensive' was observed.

CONCLUSION

Applying current CVD risk calculators in the elderly 'reclassified hypertensive', as a result of shifting the BP threshold lower, increases eligibility for antihypertensive treatment but documented CVD rates remain lower than hypertensive patients defined by pre2017 BP thresholds.

摘要

目的

美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会2017年高血压指南推荐将血压目标设定为低于130/80 mmHg,不受年龄影响。在一个基线时无已确诊心血管疾病(CVD)的老年队列中,我们确定了该指南对高血压患病率及相关CVD风险的影响。

方法

阿司匹林用于减少老年人事件(ASPREE)研究中19114名年龄至少65岁的参与者按基线血压分组:“2017年前高血压患者”(血压≥140/90 mmHg和/或正在服用降压药);“重新分类的高血压患者”(按照2017年前指南为血压正常;按照美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会2017年指南为高血压),以及“血压正常者”(血压<130和<80 mmHg)。对于每组,我们评估了CVD危险因素,使用动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险方程预测10年CVD风险,并报告了在中位4.7年随访期间观察到的CVD事件发生率。

结果

总体而言,74.4%(14213/19114)为“2017年前高血压患者”;另有12.3%(2354/19114)按照美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会2017年指南被“重新分类为高血压患者”。在那些“重新分类的高血压患者”中,大多数(94.5%)符合降压治疗标准,尽管29%除年龄外没有其他传统CVD危险因素。此外,与“2017年前高血压患者”相比,“重新分类的高血压患者”观察到相对较低的平均10年预测CVD风险(18%对26%,P<0.001)和较低的CVD发生率(8.9对12.1/1000人年,P = 0.01)。与“血压正常者”相比,“2017年前高血压患者”CVD事件的风险比(95%置信区间)为1.60(1.26 - 2.02),“重新分类的高血压患者”为1.26(0.93 - 1.71)。

结论

由于降低了血压阈值,在老年“重新分类的高血压患者”中应用当前的CVD风险计算器增加了降压治疗的适用率,但记录的CVD发生率仍低于按照2017年前血压阈值定义的高血压患者。