重新加权橙子为苹果:转运 RE-LY 试验与非实验性心房颤动抗凝效果估计。
Reweighting Oranges to Apples: Transported RE-LY Trial Versus Nonexperimental Effect Estimates of Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.
机构信息
From the Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
出版信息
Epidemiology. 2020 Sep;31(5):605-613. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001230.
BACKGROUND
Results from trials and nonexperimental studies are often directly compared, with little attention paid to differences between study populations. When target and trial population data are available, accounting for these differences through transporting trial results to target populations of interest provides useful perspective. We aimed to compare two-year risk differences (RDs) for ischemic stroke, mortality, and gastrointestinal bleeding in older adults with atrial fibrillation initiating dabigatran and warfarin when using trial transport methods versus nonexperimental methods.
METHODS
We identified Medicare beneficiaries who initiated warfarin or dabigatran from a 20% nationwide sample. To transport treatment effects observed in the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation trial, we applied inverse odds weights to standardize estimates to two Medicare target populations of interest, initiators of: (1) dabigatran and (2) warfarin. Separately, we conducted a nonexperimental study in the Medicare populations using standardized morbidity ratio weighting to control measured confounding.
RESULTS
Comparing dabigatran to warfarin, estimated two-year RDs for ischemic stroke were similar with trial transport and nonexperimental methods. However, two-year mortality RDs were closer to the null when using trial transport versus nonexperimental methods for the dabigatran target population (transported RD: -0.57%; nonexperimental RD: -1.9%). Estimated gastrointestinal bleeding RDs from trial transport (dabigatran initiator RD: 1.8%; warfarin initiator RD: 1.9%) appeared more harmful than nonexperimental results (dabigatran initiator RD: 0.14%; warfarin initiator RD: 0.57%).
CONCLUSIONS
Differences in study populations can and should be considered quantitatively to ensure results are relevant to populations of interest, particularly when comparing trial with nonexperimental findings. See video abstract: http://links.lww.com/EDE/B703.
背景
试验和非试验研究的结果经常直接进行比较,很少关注研究人群之间的差异。当目标人群和试验人群的数据可用时,通过将试验结果转移到感兴趣的目标人群中,可以对这些差异进行核算,从而提供有用的视角。我们旨在比较使用试验转移方法和非试验方法时,在接受达比加群和华法林治疗的老年房颤患者中,缺血性卒中、死亡率和胃肠道出血的两年风险差异(RD)。
方法
我们从全国 20%的抽样中确定了开始服用华法林或达比加群的 Medicare 受益人群。为了将长期抗凝试验的随机评估中观察到的治疗效果转移到两个 Medicare 目标人群中,我们应用了逆概率比权重来将估计值标准化到两个目标人群:(1)开始服用达比加群的人群;(2)开始服用华法林的人群。另外,我们在 Medicare 人群中进行了一项非试验研究,使用标准化发病率比权重来控制已测量的混杂因素。
结果
与非试验方法相比,使用试验转移方法,达比加群与华法林相比,缺血性卒中的两年估计 RD 相似。然而,当将达比加群目标人群的试验转移与非试验方法相比时,两年死亡率 RD 更接近零(转移 RD:-0.57%;非试验 RD:-1.9%)。来自试验转移的估计胃肠道出血 RD(达比加群起始者 RD:1.8%;华法林起始者 RD:1.9%)似乎比非试验结果更有害(达比加群起始者 RD:0.14%;华法林起始者 RD:0.57%)。
结论
研究人群的差异可以并且应该被定量考虑,以确保结果与目标人群相关,特别是当比较试验与非试验结果时。