• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科肿瘤随访中的性功能障碍评估:宫颈癌或子宫内膜癌(SWELL-CE)患者报告结局测量后的性健康发展。

Sexual Morbidity Assessment in Gyne-Oncology Follow-Up: Development of the Sexual Well-Being After Cervical or Endometrial Cancer (SWELL-CE) Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.

机构信息

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Adult Psychological Support Service & Applied Health Research Group, London, UK.

Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2020 Oct;17(10):2005-2015. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.019
PMID:32741745
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical assessment and management of sexual difficulties after gynecological cancer remain a neglected aspect of women's rehabilitation.

AIM

To develop and validate a patient-reported outcome measure of sexual well-being for women experiencing sexual consequences of cervical and endometrial cancer treatment for use in routine follow-up.

METHODS

This is a sequential mixed method study comprising (i) in-depth qualitative interviews (n=21 of 118) to generate items regarding sexual consequences of cervical or endometrial cancer and treatment; (ii) questionnaire construction with 51 core items (all respondents) and 4 subsections (18-58 items), depending on the relationship status and whether or not participants were sexually active (SA/NSA); (iii) item refinement following cognitive debriefing (n=13 of 21); (iv) validation of resultant items via postal survey (n=788 women) and Rasch analysis; and (v) creation of brief (14-item) clinical screener. Women attending routine follow-up (3 months to 5 years) at 6 English cancer centers and members of 3 UK cancer patient websites, who met the study inclusion criteria, were invited to participate.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome of this study was the construction and initial psychometric testing of SWELL-CE short and long form versions.

RESULTS

21 women participated in interviews and 250 of 788 (32%) returned the postal survey (T1). 110 draft items were evaluated using cognitive testing (n=13) to refine instrument design and test face validity, comprehension, and acceptability. Exploratory factor analysis of survey data (n=250) produced an initial 6 domain structure as a guidance for the Rasch analysis. Subsequent Rasch analysis yielded a 3 domain structure: physical sexual function, sexual and relationship concerns, and sexual desire and sexual self-esteem, each satisfying Rasch model requirements within their respective SA (item pool =59) and NSA (item pool =53) categories, including the absence of local response dependency and all showing strict unidimensionality. The 3 subscales demonstrated good psychometric properties, external validity, and test-retest reliability. A valid Rasch short form of 14 items was created from the larger item pool.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This PROM may assist clinicians to improve identification, discussion, and management of women who could benefit from sexual rehabilitation.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Initial evaluation supports psychometric validity and reliability in the assessment of physical sexual function, sexual interest and sexual self-esteem, and sexual and relationship concerns in this study sample. However, given this study's modest response rate (32%, n=250), findings should be interpreted with caution. This PROM identifies sexual concerns in women who are sexually active or sexually non-active due to illness or treatment-associated sexual difficulties.

CONCLUSION

Sexual Well-being after Cervical or Endometrial Cancer is a novel and psychometrically valid sexual well-being measure for clinical assessment of female sexual difficulties after cervical or endometrial cancer treatment. White ID, Tennant A, Taylor C, Sexual Morbidity Assessment in Gyne-Oncology Follow-Up: Development of the Sexual Well-Being After Cervical or Endometrial Cancer (SWELL-CE) Patient-Reported Outcome Measure. J Sex Med 2020;17:2005-2015.

摘要

背景

妇科癌症患者的临床评估和性困难管理仍然是女性康复中被忽视的一个方面。

目的

为了开发和验证一种针对经历宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌治疗后性后果的患者报告的性健康测量工具,用于常规随访。

方法

这是一项序贯混合方法研究,包括(i)深入的定性访谈(n=118 名中的 21 名),以生成关于宫颈癌或子宫内膜癌及其治疗后性后果的项目;(ii)使用 51 个核心项目(所有受访者)和 4 个小节(18-58 个项目)构建问卷,具体取决于关系状况和参与者是否有性行为(有/无);(iii)认知审核后进行项目细化(n=21 名中的 13 名);(iv)通过邮寄调查(n=788 名女性)和 Rasch 分析对所得项目进行验证;(v)创建简短(14 项)临床筛查器。邀请在 6 个英国癌症中心进行常规随访(3 个月至 5 年)并符合研究纳入标准的女性,以及来自 3 个英国癌症患者网站的成员,参加研究。

结果

本研究的主要结果是构建和初步心理测量测试 SWELL-CE 短和长版本。

21 名女性参加了访谈,788 名中的 250 名(32%)返回了邮寄调查(T1)。使用认知测试(n=13)评估了 110 个草案项目,以改进仪器设计和测试表面有效性、理解性和可接受性。调查数据的探索性因素分析(n=250)产生了一个初始的 6 个领域结构,作为 Rasch 分析的指导。随后的 Rasch 分析产生了 3 个领域结构:身体性功能、性和关系问题、性欲望和性自尊,每个结构都在其各自的 SA(项目池=59)和 NSA(项目池=53)类别中满足 Rasch 模型要求,包括不存在局部反应依赖性,并且都显示严格的单维性。这 3 个分量表具有良好的心理测量特性、外部有效性和测试-重测信度。从更大的项目池中创建了一个有效的 Rasch 简短形式,其中包含 14 个项目。

临床意义

该 PROM 可能有助于临床医生改善识别、讨论和管理可能受益于性康复的女性。

优势与局限性

初步评估支持在评估研究样本中的身体性功能、性兴趣和性自尊以及性和关系问题方面的心理测量有效性和可靠性。然而,鉴于该研究的适度反应率(32%,n=250),应谨慎解释研究结果。该 PROM 可识别因疾病或与治疗相关的性困难而有性行为或无性行为的女性的性问题。

结论

宫颈癌或子宫内膜癌后的性健康是一种新的和具有心理测量有效性的性健康衡量标准,用于评估宫颈癌或子宫内膜癌治疗后女性的性困难。White ID、Tennant A、Taylor C、妇科肿瘤随访中的性发病率评估:宫颈癌或子宫内膜癌后性健康(SWELL-CE)患者报告结局测量的开发。J 性医学 2020;17:2005-2015。

相似文献

1
Sexual Morbidity Assessment in Gyne-Oncology Follow-Up: Development of the Sexual Well-Being After Cervical or Endometrial Cancer (SWELL-CE) Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.妇科肿瘤随访中的性功能障碍评估:宫颈癌或子宫内膜癌(SWELL-CE)患者报告结局测量后的性健康发展。
J Sex Med. 2020 Oct;17(10):2005-2015. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
2
Measuring the Sexual Acceptability of Contraception: Psychometric Examination and Development of a Valid and Reliable Prospective Instrument.测量避孕的性可接受性:心理计量学检验和有效可靠前瞻性工具的开发。
J Sex Med. 2022 Mar;19(3):507-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.12.007. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
3
Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.社会参与限制问卷的细化和验证:Rasch 分析和传统心理测量分析技术的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):328-339. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000618.
4
The Development and Validation of the Sexual and Relationship Distress Scale.性与关系困扰量表的编制与验证。
J Sex Med. 2018 Aug;15(8):1167-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
Assessment of sexual difficulties associated with multi-modal treatment for cervical or endometrial cancer: A systematic review of measurement instruments.评估宫颈癌或子宫内膜癌多模式治疗相关的性功能障碍:测量工具的系统评价
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Dec;143(3):664-673. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.332. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
6
Refinement and Validation of the Empowerment Audiology Questionnaire: Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Evaluation.赋权听力学问卷的修订与验证:Rasch 分析与传统心理计量学评估。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(3):583-599. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001449. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
7
The Sexual Event Diary (SED): Development and Validation of a Standardized Questionnaire for Assessing Female Sexual Functioning During Discrete Sexual Events.性事件日记(SED):用于评估离散性事件中女性性功能的标准化问卷的开发和验证。
J Sex Med. 2017 Nov;14(11):1438-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
8
Urinary Stones and Intervention Quality of Life (USIQoL): Development and Validation of a New Core Universal Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Urinary Calculi.尿路结石与干预生活质量(USIQoL):一种用于尿路结石的新型核心通用患者报告结局指标的开发与验证
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jan;8(1):283-290. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
9
Female sexual well-being scale (FSWB scale): development and psychometric validation in sexually functional women.女性性健康量表(FSWB量表):性功能正常女性群体中的开发与心理测量学验证
J Sex Med. 2009 May;6(5):1297-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01240.x.
10
Rasch Analysis of the Listening Effort Questionnaire-Cochlear Implant.人工耳蜗听力努力问卷的拉施分析
Ear Hear. 2021;42(6):1699-1711. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001059.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being.一项关于幸福感衡量标准的范围综述:全面幸福感的概念化和量表。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 23;12(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02074-0.
2
Development and psychometric validation of the Colorectal Cancer Literacy Scale-Uruguay Version.结直肠癌知识量表乌拉圭版的编制及心理测量学验证。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 8;11:1179792. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1179792. eCollection 2023.
3
Couples' sexual health after gynaecological cancer diagnosis - an unexplored area for further research.
妇科癌症诊断后的夫妻性健康——一个有待进一步研究的未探索领域。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2023;27(1):47-56. doi: 10.5114/wo.2023.127308. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
4
Evaluation of Patient-Reported Symptoms and Functioning after Treatment for Endometrial Cancer.子宫内膜癌治疗后患者报告症状和功能的评估。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jul 22;29(8):5213-5222. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080414.