• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fidaxomicin Compared With Oral Vancomycin for the Treatment of Severe Associated Diarrhea: A Retrospective Review.非达霉素与口服万古霉素治疗重度相关性腹泻的回顾性研究
Hosp Pharm. 2020 Aug;55(4):268-272. doi: 10.1177/0018578719844165. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
2
Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin as a First-Line Treatment for Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea in Specific Patient Populations: A Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation. fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗特定患者人群中艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的一线治疗:药物经济学评价。
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Dec;37(12):1489-1497. doi: 10.1002/phar.2049. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
Comparison of outcomes with vancomycin or metronidazole for mild-to-moderate Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea among solid organ transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study.实体器官移植受者中,万古霉素与甲硝唑治疗轻至中度艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2018 Jun;20(3):e12867. doi: 10.1111/tid.12867. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
4
Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin for the Treatment of a First Episode of Clostridium Difficile Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.非达霉素与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染初发 episode:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Cureus. 2018 Jun 11;10(6):e2778. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2778.
5
Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults.成人艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD004610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004610.pub4.
6
Fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin for severe Clostridium difficile infection: a retrospective cohort study. fidaxomicin 与口服万古霉素治疗严重艰难梭菌感染:回顾性队列研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Aug;25(8):987-993. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
7
Efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin compared with oral vancomycin for the treatment of adults with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: data from the OPT-80-003 and OPT-80-004 studies.比较 fidaxomicin 与口服万古霉素治疗成人艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的疗效和安全性:来自 OPT-80-003 和 OPT-80-004 研究的数据。
Future Microbiol. 2012 Jun;7(6):677-83. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.44.
8
Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):422-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910812.
9
Resolution of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in patients with cancer treated with fidaxomicin or vancomycin.比较 fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗癌症患者艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的缓解率。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 1;31(19):2493-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.5899. Epub 2013 May 28.
10
Fidaxomicin Use and Clinical Outcomes for Associated Diarrhea.非达霉素用于治疗相关性腹泻及其临床疗效
Infect Dis Clin Pract (Baltim Md). 2015 Jan;23(1):32-35. doi: 10.1097/IPC.0000000000000181.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications and clinical factors associated with pediatric percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a Colombian cohort.哥伦比亚队列中与儿童经皮内镜下胃造口术相关的并发症及临床因素
Front Pediatr. 2025 Aug 11;13:1623355. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1623355. eCollection 2025.
2
The Clinical Effectiveness of Fidaxomicin Compared to Vancomycin in the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection, A Single-Center Real-World Experience.非达霉素与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的临床疗效比较:单中心真实世界经验
J Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 16;230(6):1501-1509. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae274.
3
Real-world comparison of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin or metronidazole in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非达霉素与万古霉素或甲硝唑治疗艰难梭菌感染的真实世界比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;78(11):1727-1737. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03376-1. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
4
Clinical and Economic Outcomes After Implementation of a Fidaxomicin Treatment Optimization and Access Pathway at a US Hospital System.美国一家医院系统实施非达霉素治疗优化与获取途径后的临床和经济结果
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Jan;12(1):95-107. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00665-1. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA) 2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.
2
Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review.成人艰难梭菌的诊断与治疗:系统评价。
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):398-408. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17103.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in Clostridium difficile infection.非达霉素与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的成本效益分析
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Nov;69(11):2901-12. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku257. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
4
Administration of proton pump inhibitors in critically ill medical patients is associated with increased risk of developing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.在重症内科患者中使用质子泵抑制剂与发生艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的风险增加有关。
J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):696.e11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
5
Resolution of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in patients with cancer treated with fidaxomicin or vancomycin.比较 fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗癌症患者艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的缓解率。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 1;31(19):2493-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.5899. Epub 2013 May 28.
6
Fidaxomicin: a novel macrocyclic antibiotic for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.非达霉素:一种新型的大环内酯类抗生素,用于治疗艰难梭菌感染。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Jun 1;69(11):933-43. doi: 10.2146/ajhp110371.
7
Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for infection with Clostridium difficile in Europe, Canada, and the USA: a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗欧洲、加拿大和美国艰难梭菌感染:一项双盲、非劣效、随机对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;12(4):281-9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70374-7. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
8
Fidaxomicin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infections. fidaxomicin 治疗艰难梭菌感染。
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Feb;46(2):219-28. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q481. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
9
Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):422-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0910812.
10
The effect of hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection on in-hospital mortality.医院获得性艰难梭菌感染对住院死亡率的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Nov 8;170(20):1804-10. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.405.

非达霉素与口服万古霉素治疗重度相关性腹泻的回顾性研究

Fidaxomicin Compared With Oral Vancomycin for the Treatment of Severe Associated Diarrhea: A Retrospective Review.

作者信息

Summers Bryant B, Yates Mary, Cleveland Kerry O, Gelfand Michael S, Usery Justin

机构信息

Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.

Methodist Le Bonheur Germantown Hospital, Germantown, TN, USA.

出版信息

Hosp Pharm. 2020 Aug;55(4):268-272. doi: 10.1177/0018578719844165. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1177/0018578719844165
PMID:32742016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7370342/
Abstract

The most recent published guidelines on -associated diarrhea (CDAD) developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were released in 2017 and outline its treatment based on severity of the disease and recurrence; however, a clear first-line agent has not been recommended specifically for severe CDAD. This retrospective chart review was approved by the institutional review board and consisted of three community hospitals and one academic medical center. To be included, patients need to meet criteria for severe CDAD and receive at least 72 hours of therapy. Patients received either oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin, in addition to other therapies for CDAD, and differences in outcomes such as cost obtained from a common charge center, rates of recurrence, time to recurrence as measured at time of positive to negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, and mortality were assessed. Of the 147 patients, 74 patients received fidaxomicin and 73 patients received oral vancomycin. The average hospitalization cost for patients receiving fidaxomicin was $129,338.69 and for patients receiving vancomycin was $153,563.81 ( = .26). Recurrence rates were lower with fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin (6.8% vs 17.6%; = .047), and time to recurrence was longer with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin, but not statistically significant (96.8 ± 45.9 days vs 63.2 ± 66.9 days; = .321). Mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and overall length of stay were similar between the two therapies. In the treatment of severe CDAD, recurrence rates were lower and time to recurrence was higher with fidaxomicin compared with oral vancomycin. A clear financial benefit has yet to translate from these known findings.

摘要

美国传染病学会(IDSA)制定的关于艰难梭菌相关性腹泻(CDAD)的最新发布指南于2017年发布,该指南根据疾病的严重程度和复发情况概述了其治疗方法;然而,尚未专门推荐一种明确的一线药物用于严重CDAD。这项回顾性图表审查得到了机构审查委员会的批准,包括三家社区医院和一家学术医疗中心。要纳入研究,患者需要符合严重CDAD的标准并接受至少72小时的治疗。患者除接受CDAD的其他治疗外,还接受口服万古霉素或非达霉素治疗,并评估从共同收费中心获得的费用、复发率、从聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测呈阳性到阴性时测量的复发时间以及死亡率等结果差异。在147例患者中,74例患者接受非达霉素治疗,73例患者接受口服万古霉素治疗。接受非达霉素治疗的患者平均住院费用为129,338.69美元,接受万古霉素治疗的患者平均住院费用为153,563.81美元(P = 0.26)。与万古霉素相比,非达霉素的复发率更低(6.8%对17.6%;P = 0.047),非达霉素的复发时间比万古霉素更长,但无统计学意义(96.8±45.9天对63.2±66.9天;P = 0.321)。两种治疗方法的死亡率、重症监护病房住院时间和总住院时间相似。在严重CDAD的治疗中,与口服万古霉素相比,非达霉素的复发率更低,复发时间更长。这些已知发现尚未转化为明显的经济效益。