Suppr超能文献

简短结构化干预措施用于停用长期苯二氮䓬类药物使用的成本效益:一项与随机对照试验同步进行的经济分析。

Cost-effectiveness of brief structured interventions to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use: an economic analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Trépel Dominic, Ali Shehzad, Gilbody Simon, Leiva Alfonso, Mcmillan Dean, Bejarano Ferran, Sempere Ermengol, Vicens Caterina

机构信息

School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland.

Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2020 Jun 3;3:33. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13049.1. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

In Spain, long-term use of benzodiazepine is prevalent in 7% of the population; however, this longer-term use lacks clinical benefits, costs €90million per year and side-effects further add extra cost through adverse health outcomes. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of primary care services stepped dose reduction of long-term benzodiazepines using either Structured Interview with Follow-up (SIF) or Without Follow-up (SIW), compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU). Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside randomised control utilizing data from three arm cluster randomized trial. Primary care. 75 general practitioners were randomised to one of the three arms (TAU, SIW, SIF). Cost and Cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) Compared to usual care, providing SIW per participant costs an additional €117.94 and adding patient follow-up, €218.4. As a result of intervention, participants showed a gain of, on average, for SIW 0.0144 QALY (95% CI -0.0137 to 0.0425) and for SIF 0.0340 QALYs (0.0069 to 0.0612). The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio was €8190.28/QALY (SIW) and €6423.53/QALY (SIF). At the Spanish reimbursement threshold (€45,000 per QALY) the chance interventions are cost effective is 79.8% for SIW and 97.7% for SIF. Brief structured interventions to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use represent value for money, particularly with scheduled follow-up appointments, and would represent a cost-effective investment by the Spanish healthcare to reduce prevalence of long-term use.

摘要

在西班牙,7%的人口普遍长期使用苯二氮䓬类药物;然而,这种长期使用并无临床益处,每年花费9000万欧元,且副作用会通过不良健康后果进一步增加额外成本。本研究旨在评估与常规治疗(TAU)相比,采用有随访的结构化访谈(SIF)或无随访的结构化访谈(SIW)逐步减少长期苯二氮䓬类药物剂量的初级保健服务的成本效益。利用三臂整群随机试验的数据,在随机对照的同时进行成本效益分析。初级保健。75名全科医生被随机分配到三个组之一(TAU、SIW、SIF)。成本和每质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本 与常规护理相比,为每位参与者提供SIW额外花费117.94欧元,增加患者随访则额外花费218.4欧元。作为干预的结果,参与者平均获得的QALY增益为:SIW为0.0144(95%CI -0.0137至0.0425),SIF为0.0340(0.0069至0.0612)。增量成本效益比为8190.28欧元/QALY(SIW)和6423.53欧元/QALY(SIF)。在西班牙的报销阈值(每QALY 45000欧元)下,SIW干预具有成本效益的概率为79.8%,SIF为97.7%。简短的结构化干预措施以停止长期使用苯二氮䓬类药物物有所值,特别是安排随访预约,这将是西班牙医疗保健机构为降低长期使用患病率而进行的具有成本效益的投资。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d834/7372528/08d89094b14c/hrbopenres-3-14145-g0000.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验