• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赌博业员工对现场负责任赌博计划的体验。

Gambling Industry Employees' Experiences with an Onsite Responsible Gambling Program.

机构信息

Division on Addiction, Cambridge Health Alliance, Malden, MA, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2021 Jun;37(2):369-386. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09969-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-020-09969-8
PMID:32743754
Abstract

We examined gambling venue employees' experiences with GameSense, an onsite responsible gambling information center designed to be a resource for casino employees as well as patrons. Participants included 492 employees who reported on their engagement with, and opinions and knowledge of, the GameSense information center and its staff (i.e., GameSense Advisors), as well as their own employment department and gambling involvement. A minority of participants (33.5%) reported having spoken with a GameSense Advisor about responsible gambling or problem gambling; the remaining 66.5% either did not ever speak to a GameSense Advisor or only had a casual conversation with one. Most participants (88.9%) indicated that casino patrons could use the GameSense program, but less than half (37.9%) believed that casino staff/employees could do the same. Participants generally had positive opinions about the program, endorsing positive potential impacts (e.g., "It helps people avoid gambling beyond their limits") more often than negative potential impacts (e.g., "It encourages people to gamble beyond their limits"). However, gambling venue employees with more extensive gambling histories were less likely to endorse positive potential impacts. Participants' department also was associated with GameSense experiences: those in security/surveillance were the most likely to report having interacted with GameSense Advisors (83.3%) and those in food/beverage/retail were least likely to have done so (28.6%). Some of these findings have implications for improving casino employees' experiences with the GameSense program.

摘要

我们考察了博彩场所员工对 GameSense 的体验,这是一个现场负责任博彩信息中心,旨在成为赌场员工和顾客的资源。参与者包括 492 名员工,他们报告了自己与 GameSense 信息中心及其工作人员(即 GameSense 顾问)的互动情况、对该信息中心及其工作人员的看法和了解,以及自己所在的部门和赌博参与情况。少数参与者(33.5%)报告曾与 GameSense 顾问就负责任赌博或问题赌博进行过交谈;其余 66.5%的人要么从未与 GameSense 顾问交谈过,要么只是与他们进行过一次随意的交谈。大多数参与者(88.9%)表示赌场顾客可以使用 GameSense 计划,但不到一半(37.9%)的人认为赌场员工/员工也可以这样做。参与者普遍对该计划持积极看法,赞成其积极的潜在影响(例如,“它帮助人们避免赌博超出自己的承受能力”)多于消极的潜在影响(例如,“它鼓励人们超出自己的承受能力去赌博”)。然而,赌博历史较长的博彩场所员工不太可能赞成积极的潜在影响。参与者所在部门也与 GameSense 的体验相关:安全/监控部门的员工最有可能报告与 GameSense 顾问进行过互动(83.3%),而食品/饮料/零售部门的员工则最不可能这样做(28.6%)。这些发现中的一些对改善赌场员工对 GameSense 计划的体验有一定的启示。

相似文献

1
Gambling Industry Employees' Experiences with an Onsite Responsible Gambling Program.赌博业员工对现场负责任赌博计划的体验。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Jun;37(2):369-386. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09969-8.
2
Player-Facing Casino Employees: Engagement with Responsible Gambling Programming and its Association with Referring Players.面向玩家的赌场员工:参与负责任的赌博计划及其与推荐玩家的关联。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Dec;40(4):1805-1821. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10350-2. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
3
A Comparison of Two GameSense Implementation Approaches: How Program Awareness and Engagement Relate to Gambling Beliefs and Behaviors.两种游戏感知实现方法的比较:计划意识和参与度与赌博信念和行为的关系。
J Gambl Stud. 2022 Mar;38(1):153-183. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10013-6. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
4
Examining Responsible Gambling Program Awareness and Engagement Trends and Relationships with Gambling Beliefs and Behaviors: A Three-Wave Study of Customers from a Major Gambling Operator.考察负责任博彩计划意识和参与趋势,以及与博彩信念和行为的关系:来自一家主要博彩运营商的客户的三波研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Mar;39(1):401-429. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10109-7. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
A Study of Adaptive Gambling Behavior of Casino Employees in Macau.澳门赌场员工的适应性赌博行为研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Jun;37(2):351-367. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09934-5.
6
Gambling, drinking, smoking and other health risk activities among casino employees.赌场员工中的赌博、饮酒、吸烟及其他危害健康的活动。
Am J Ind Med. 1999 Sep;36(3):365-78. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199909)36:3<365::aid-ajim4>3.0.co;2-i.
7
Using Opinions and Knowledge to Identify Natural Groups of Gambling Employees.运用观点和知识来识别赌博从业人员的自然群体。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Dec;31(4):1753-66. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9490-1.
8
Gaming industry employees' responses to responsible gambling training: a public health imperative.游戏产业员工对负责任赌博培训的反应:公共卫生的当务之急。
J Gambl Stud. 2012 Jun;28(2):171-91. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9255-z.
9
Who holds a shared responsibility view of minimizing gambling harm? Results from a multiwave survey of casino gamblers.谁持有最小化赌博伤害的共同责任观?赌场赌客的多波调查结果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Jun;36(4):347-357. doi: 10.1037/adb0000767. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
10
Disordered gambling among Chinese casino employees.中国赌场员工中的赌博 disorder。(这里原文disordered gambling字面意思是“紊乱的赌博”,结合语境意译为“赌博 disorder”,但“赌博 disorder”在医学上更准确的说法可能是“赌博障碍”,不过仅按要求翻译原文如此。)
J Gambl Stud. 2008 Jun;24(2):207-17. doi: 10.1007/s10899-007-9068-2. Epub 2007 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Player-Facing Casino Employees: Engagement with Responsible Gambling Programming and its Association with Referring Players.面向玩家的赌场员工:参与负责任的赌博计划及其与推荐玩家的关联。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Dec;40(4):1805-1821. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10350-2. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
Much Ado About Nothing? The Role of Land-Based Gambling Venue Employees in Facilitating Problem Gambling Harm Reduction and Help-Seeking.《无事生非?陆基博彩场所员工在促进赌瘾问题减轻和寻求帮助方面的作用》
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Mar;40(1):387-408. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10226-x. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
3
Examining Responsible Gambling Program Awareness and Engagement Trends and Relationships with Gambling Beliefs and Behaviors: A Three-Wave Study of Customers from a Major Gambling Operator.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Responsible Drinking Is in the Service of Evidence-based Public Health: A Response to Petticrew et al. (2020).理解适度饮酒有助于循证公共卫生:对佩蒂克鲁等人(2020年)的回应
Health Commun. 2021 Feb;36(2):260-262. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1827542. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Strategies to customize responsible gambling messages: a review and focus group study.定制负责任赌博信息的策略:综述和焦点小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):1381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6281-0.
3
Pathological Gambling and Motor Impulsivity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
考察负责任博彩计划意识和参与趋势,以及与博彩信念和行为的关系:来自一家主要博彩运营商的客户的三波研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Mar;39(1):401-429. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10109-7. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
病理性赌博与运动冲动性:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Dec;33(4):1213-1239. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9683-5.
4
Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependence under managed health care: a combined stepped-care and matching model.在管理式医疗保健下整合个人和公共卫生视角以治疗烟草依赖:一种联合的逐步照护与匹配模型
Ann Behav Med. 1996 Fall;18(4):290-304. doi: 10.1007/BF02895291.
5
Does learning about the mathematics of gambling change gambling behavior?了解赌博的数学原理会改变赌博行为吗?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;20(1):62-8. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.1.62.
6
A science-based framework for responsible gambling: the Reno model.负责任赌博的科学框架:里诺模式。
J Gambl Stud. 2004 Fall;20(3):301-17. doi: 10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040281.49444.e2.