Department of Psychology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada.
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Dec;40(4):1805-1821. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10350-2. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
This research explores the engagement of player-facing casino employees with GameSense, a responsible gambling (RG) program, and referral of players to GameSense. We surveyed 280 employees across three casinos in Massachusetts that use this RG program as part of their RG strategy. We found that although most player-facing casino employees were aware of GameSense, slightly over half visited a GameSense Information Center, and about two-thirds interacted with a GameSense Advisor. In terms of the reason for visiting, Latent Class Analysis (LCA) revealed three distinct classes: Comprehensive Interests, RG Interests, and Focused Interests. As for those who have yet to visit, LCA two classes emerged: RG Proficiency Beliefs and Tempered RG Proficiency Beliefs. Engaged employees were more likely to refer players to GameSense, highlighting the need for targeted approaches addressing the diverse interests of player-facing employees for engaging or not engaging with GameSense. These findings underscore the importance of have player-facing casino employees engage with RG programming, and targeted approached for engagement, to enhance the efficacy of RG initiatives, and contribute to a more robust RG framework within the gambling industry.
本研究探讨了面向玩家的赌场员工对 GameSense 的参与情况,以及将玩家转介给 GameSense 的情况。我们调查了马萨诸塞州三家使用该 RG 计划作为其 RG 策略一部分的赌场的 280 名员工。我们发现,尽管大多数面向玩家的赌场员工都知道 GameSense,但略多于一半的人访问了 GameSense 信息中心,约三分之二的人与 GameSense 顾问进行了互动。就访问原因而言,潜在类别分析 (LCA) 揭示了三个不同的类别:全面兴趣、RG 兴趣和专注兴趣。对于那些尚未访问过的人,LCA 出现了两类:RG 熟练程度信念和温和 RG 熟练程度信念。参与的员工更有可能将玩家转介给 GameSense,这突出表明需要针对面向玩家的员工的不同兴趣采取有针对性的方法来参与或不参与 GameSense。这些发现强调了让面向玩家的赌场员工参与 RG 计划的重要性,以及有针对性的参与方法,以提高 RG 计划的效果,并为赌博行业内更强大的 RG 框架做出贡献。