• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英语口语中韵律构词复杂度的标度定律。

Scaling Laws for Phonotactic Complexity in Spoken English Language Data.

机构信息

Department of English and American Studies, University of Vienna, Austria.

Department of Contemporary English Language, Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

Lang Speech. 2021 Sep;64(3):693-704. doi: 10.1177/0023830920944445. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1177/0023830920944445
PMID:32744167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8406375/
Abstract

Two prominent statistical laws in language and other complex systems are Zipf's law and Heaps' law. We investigate the extent to which these two laws apply to the linguistic domain of phonotactics-that is, to sequences of sounds. We analyze phonotactic sequences with different lengths within words and across word boundaries taken from a corpus of spoken English (Buckeye). We demonstrate that the expected relationship between the two scaling laws can only be attested when boundary spanning phonotactic sequences are also taken into account. Furthermore, it is shown that Zipf's law exhibits both high goodness-of-fit and a high scaling coefficient if sequences of more than two sounds are considered. Our results support the notion that phonotactic cognition employs information about boundary spanning phonotactic sequences.

摘要

语言和其他复杂系统中的两个突出的统计规律是齐夫定律和海普斯定律。我们研究了这两个定律在音韵学的语言领域,即声音序列中的应用程度。我们分析了取自英语口语语料库(Buckeye)的单词内和词间不同长度的音韵序列。我们证明,只有考虑跨越边界的音韵序列时,才能证明这两个标度定律之间的预期关系。此外,如果考虑超过两个音的序列,齐夫定律则表现出很好的拟合优度和较高的标度系数。我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即音韵认知利用了跨越边界的音韵序列的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1153/8406375/9fcd6603e30d/10.1177_0023830920944445-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1153/8406375/2e30a391fae3/10.1177_0023830920944445-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1153/8406375/9fcd6603e30d/10.1177_0023830920944445-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1153/8406375/2e30a391fae3/10.1177_0023830920944445-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1153/8406375/9fcd6603e30d/10.1177_0023830920944445-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Scaling Laws for Phonotactic Complexity in Spoken English Language Data.英语口语中韵律构词复杂度的标度定律。
Lang Speech. 2021 Sep;64(3):693-704. doi: 10.1177/0023830920944445. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
Zipf's law leads to Heaps' law: analyzing their relation in finite-size systems.齐夫定律导致海普斯定律:分析有限系统中的它们之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 2;5(12):e14139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014139.
3
Zipf's law revisited: Spoken dialog, linguistic units, parameters, and the principle of least effort.再探齐夫定律:口语对话、语言单位、参数和省力原则。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):77-101. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02142-9. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
4
Scaling laws in natural conversations among elderly people.老年人自然会话中的标度律。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0246884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246884. eCollection 2021.
5
Deviation of Zipf's and Heaps' Laws in human languages with limited dictionary sizes.有限词汇量下人类语言中齐夫定律和赫普定律的偏离。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1082. doi: 10.1038/srep01082. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
6
Range-limited Heaps' law for functional DNA words in the human genome.人类基因组中功能性DNA单词的范围受限的齐普夫定律
J Theor Biol. 2024 Sep 7;592:111878. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111878. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
7
Zipf's, Heaps' and Taylor's Laws are Determined by the Expansion into the Adjacent Possible.齐普夫定律、希普斯定律和泰勒定律由向邻接可能态的扩展所决定。
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Sep 30;20(10):752. doi: 10.3390/e20100752.
8
Evolution of scaling emergence in large-scale spatial epidemic spreading.大规模空间流行病传播中尺度涌现的进化。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021197. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
9
Large-Scale Analysis of Zipf's Law in English Texts.英文文本中齐普夫定律的大规模分析。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 22;11(1):e0147073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147073. eCollection 2016.
10
Scaling in words on Twitter.推特上文字的缩放。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Oct 2;6(10):190027. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190027. eCollection 2019 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Zipf's law revisited: Spoken dialog, linguistic units, parameters, and the principle of least effort.再探齐夫定律:口语对话、语言单位、参数和省力原则。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):77-101. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02142-9. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Word Forms Are Structured for Efficient Use.词形结构旨在实现高效使用。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):3116-3134. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12689. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
2
Unzipping Zipf's law.解开齐普夫定律
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0181987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181987. eCollection 2017.
3
Emergence of linguistic laws in human voice.人类语音中的语言规律的出现。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 8;7:43862. doi: 10.1038/srep43862.
4
Discrimination in lexical decision.词汇判断中的辨别
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0171935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171935. eCollection 2017.
5
Zipf's Law Arises Naturally When There Are Underlying, Unobserved Variables.当存在潜在的、未被观察到的变量时,齐普夫定律自然产生。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Dec 20;12(12):e1005110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005110. eCollection 2016 Dec.
6
What's in and what's out in branding? A novel articulation effect for brand names.品牌塑造中的“入”与“出”:品牌名称的一种新颖表达效果
Front Psychol. 2015 May 13;6:585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00585. eCollection 2015.
7
Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus.非人类动物的声学序列:教程综述与展望
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 Feb;91(1):13-52. doi: 10.1111/brv.12160. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
8
Zipf's word frequency law in natural language: a critical review and future directions.自然语言中的齐普夫词频定律:批判性综述与未来方向
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1112-30. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6.
9
Phonotactic diversity predicts the time depth of the world's language families.音位形态多样性预测了世界语言家族的时间深度。
PLoS One. 2013 May 17;8(5):e63238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063238. Print 2013.
10
Social scale and structural complexity in human languages.人类语言的社会规模和结构复杂性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 5;367(1597):1829-36. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0216.