• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在唤醒状态下,易分心的脆弱性存在年龄差异。

Age differences in vulnerability to distraction under arousal.

机构信息

Leonard Davis School of Gerontology.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2020 Aug;35(5):780-791. doi: 10.1037/pag0000426.

DOI:10.1037/pag0000426
PMID:32744858
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7402243/
Abstract

Aging affects brain circuitry involved in both inhibition and arousal. In this study, we tested whether older adults are more or less prone to distraction from emotionally arousing events than young adults. To do so, we examined how arousing taboo distractor words affected concurrent 1-back task performance and subsequent memory for distractors. Our second goal was to examine how the arousal level of 1 item can modulate processing of preceding neutral distractors (taboo-minus-1 distractors). During the task, participants first made 1-back judgments about target pictures that were superimposed with to-be-ignored neutral or taboo distractors. Relative to young adults, older adults were more distracted by taboo than neutral words on the 1-back task and remembered more of the taboo distractors on a later incidental recognition task. Furthermore, young adults showed better suppression of taboo-minus-1 distractors than neutral distractors, whereas in older adults, arousal did not facilitate suppression of taboo-minus-1 distractors. This effect appeared to require attentional control as adding an unrelated attentional load during the 1-back task eliminated the beneficial effect of arousal for young adults' suppression of taboo-minus-1 distractors. Finally, when top-down attentional guidance was provided by increasing the goal relevance of target pictures, both groups showed enhanced suppression of taboo-minus-1 distractors versus other neutral distractors. Together, these findings imply that the effect of arousal on distractibility in aging may arise from an interaction between top-down and bottom-up processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

衰老会影响大脑中涉及抑制和唤醒的神经回路。在这项研究中,我们测试了老年人是否比年轻人更容易受到情绪唤醒事件的干扰。为此,我们研究了令人兴奋的禁忌分心词如何影响同时进行的 1 -back 任务表现和随后对分心词的记忆。我们的第二个目标是检验 1 项物品的兴奋程度如何调节对先前中性分心词(禁忌-1 分心词)的加工。在任务中,参与者首先对目标图片进行 1-back 判断,这些图片叠加了要忽略的中性或禁忌分心词。与年轻人相比,老年人在 1-back 任务中对禁忌词的分心程度更高,在随后的偶然识别任务中对禁忌分心词的记忆也更多。此外,年轻人对禁忌-1 分心词的抑制作用优于中性分心词,而在老年人中,兴奋并没有促进对禁忌-1 分心词的抑制。这种效应似乎需要注意力控制,因为在 1-back 任务中增加不相关的注意力负荷会消除兴奋对年轻人抑制禁忌-1 分心词的有益影响。最后,当通过增加目标图片的目标相关性来提供自上而下的注意力引导时,两组都表现出对禁忌-1 分心词的抑制作用增强,而不是对其他中性分心词的抑制作用增强。总之,这些发现意味着,兴奋对衰老中分心的影响可能是自上而下和自下而上的过程相互作用的结果。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/c404620bae75/nihms-1065926-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/944fba31f357/nihms-1065926-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/db23cfe1ce89/nihms-1065926-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/e4f01b684765/nihms-1065926-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/27043d9badc6/nihms-1065926-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/c404620bae75/nihms-1065926-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/944fba31f357/nihms-1065926-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/db23cfe1ce89/nihms-1065926-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/e4f01b684765/nihms-1065926-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/27043d9badc6/nihms-1065926-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf99/7402243/c404620bae75/nihms-1065926-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Age differences in vulnerability to distraction under arousal.在唤醒状态下,易分心的脆弱性存在年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Aug;35(5):780-791. doi: 10.1037/pag0000426.
2
The effects of taboo-related distraction on driving performance.与禁忌相关的干扰对驾驶表现的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Jul;168:20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
3
Age-related differences in the evaluation of highly arousing language.年龄相关的高度唤起性语言评估差异。
Psychol Aging. 2024 May;39(3):288-298. doi: 10.1037/pag0000809.
4
Attentional capture by taboo words: A functional view of auditory distraction.禁忌词引发的注意捕获:听觉分心的功能视角
Emotion. 2017 Jun;17(4):740-750. doi: 10.1037/emo0000274. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
5
The influence of autonomic arousal and semantic relatedness on memory for emotional words.自主唤醒和语义关联性对情绪性词汇记忆的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Jul;61(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.022. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
6
Capturing and holding attention: the impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation.吸引并保持注意力:快速序列视觉呈现中情感词汇的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jan;36(1):182-200. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.1.182.
7
Emotional distractors can enhance attention.情绪干扰因素可以增强注意力。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2322-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797613492774. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
8
Distraction by emotional sounds: Disentangling arousal benefits and orienting costs.情绪性声音的干扰:区分唤醒益处与定向成本。
Emotion. 2015 Aug;15(4):428-37. doi: 10.1037/a0039041. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
9
Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?工作记忆中的老化和分心抵抗:情绪效价重要吗?
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 4;10(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00953-y.
10
Perceptual salience does not influence emotional arousal's impairing effects on top-down attention.知觉显著性不会影响情绪唤醒对自上而下注意的损害作用。
Emotion. 2017 Jun;17(4):700-706. doi: 10.1037/emo0000245. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Affective distraction by emotional arousal during visual attention: a comparative study with young and older adults.视觉注意过程中情绪唤醒引起的情感分心:一项针对年轻人和老年人的比较研究。
Cogn Process. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01294-5.
2
Eye movement evidence for locus coeruleus-noradrenaline system contributions to age differences in attention.蓝斑-去甲肾上腺素系统对注意力年龄差异影响的眼动证据
Psychol Aging. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1037/pag0000930.
3
Memory selectivity in older age.老年人的记忆选择性。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Feb;55:101744. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101744. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
4
Age-related reductions in arousal-enhanced memory are moderated by trait emotion regulation.年龄相关的唤醒增强记忆的减少受特质情绪调节的调节。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 19;13(1):15469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41741-x.
5
The association between head motion during functional magnetic resonance imaging and executive functioning in older adults.老年人功能磁共振成像期间头部运动与执行功能之间的关联。
Neuroimage Rep. 2022 Jun;2(2). doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100085. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
6
Behavioral and fMRI evidence that arousal enhances bottom-up selectivity in young but not older adults.行为和 fMRI 证据表明,唤醒增强了年轻成年人而非老年成年人的下传选择性。
Neurobiol Aging. 2022 Dec;120:149-166. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
7
Influence of Reward Motivation on Directed Forgetting in Younger and Older Adults.奖励动机对年轻人和老年人定向遗忘的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 31;11:1764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01764. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Arousal increases neural gain via the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in younger adults but not in older adults.在年轻人中,觉醒通过蓝斑 - 去甲肾上腺素系统增加神经增益,但在老年人中则不然。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2:356-366. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0344-1. Epub 2018 May 7.
2
Arousal (but not valence) amplifies the impact of salience.觉醒(而非效价)会增强显著性的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2018 May;32(3):616-622. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1330189. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
3
Resting-state networks associated with cognitive processing show more age-related decline than those associated with emotional processing.与认知加工相关的静息态网络比与情绪加工相关的静息态网络表现出更多与年龄相关的衰退。
Neurobiol Aging. 2017 Jun;54:152-162. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
4
Modulation of locus coeruleus activity by novel oddball stimuli.新型异常刺激对蓝斑核活动的调制。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 Apr;12(2):577-584. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9700-4.
5
Perceptual salience does not influence emotional arousal's impairing effects on top-down attention.知觉显著性不会影响情绪唤醒对自上而下注意的损害作用。
Emotion. 2017 Jun;17(4):700-706. doi: 10.1037/emo0000245. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
6
Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.注意分散会降低编码时对分心的抵抗,但不会降低检索时的抵抗。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1268-1273. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1210-7.
7
Cognitive Control As a Double-Edged Sword.认知控制:双刃剑。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Dec;20(12):905-915. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.002.
8
TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences.TurkPrime.com:一个适用于行为科学的多功能众包数据采集平台。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):433-442. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z.
9
Norepinephrine ignites local hotspots of neuronal excitation: How arousal amplifies selectivity in perception and memory.去甲肾上腺素点燃神经元兴奋的局部热点:唤醒如何增强感知和记忆的选择性。
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e200. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000667. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
10
Conceptual processing of distractors by older but not younger adults.老年人而非年轻人对干扰项的概念处理。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2252-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797614555725. Epub 2014 Nov 6.