Suppr超能文献

背景与设计:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心研究,旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术在需要主动脉瓣干预的严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄女性患者中的安全性和疗效(随机研究在所有适合接受主动脉瓣狭窄介入治疗的女性患者中[RHEIA 试验])。

Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter heart valve replacement in female patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve intervention (Randomized researcH in womEn all comers wIth Aortic stenosis [RHEIA] trial).

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Rouen University Hospital, FHU REMOD-VHF, Rouen, France.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2020 Oct;228:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data suggest that transcatheter (TAVR) as compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) may be more effective in female than male patients. To date, most evidence is derived from subgroup analyses of large trials, and a dedicated randomized trial evaluating whether there is a difference in outcomes between these interventions in women is warranted. The RHEIA trial will compare the safety and efficacy of TAVR with SAVR in women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve intervention, irrespective of surgical risk.

METHODS/DESIGN: The RHEIA trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled study that will enroll up to 440 patients across 35 sites in Europe. Women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, with any but prohibitive surgical risk status, will be randomized 1:1 to undergo aortic valve intervention with either transfemoral TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 or SAPIEN 3 Ultra device or SAVR and followed up for 1 year. The objective is to determine whether TAVR is non-inferior to SAVR in this patient population and, if this is fulfilled whether TAVR is actually superior to SAVR. The primary safety/efficacy endpoint is a composite of all-cause mortality, all stroke, and re-hospitalization (for valve or procedure-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure) at 1 year post-procedure. Other outcomes (assessed at 30 days and/or 1 year) include all-cause mortality; bleeding, vascular, cardiac, cerebrovascular and renal complications; aortic valve prosthesis and left ventricular function; cognitive function, health status, and quality of life.

DISCUSSION

The RHEIA study has been designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAVR compared with SAVR specifically in women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, irrespective of the level of surgical risk. The results will be the first to provide specific randomized evidence to guide treatment selection in female patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04160130.

摘要

背景

有限的数据表明,与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)相比,经导管(TAVR)治疗可能在女性患者中更有效。迄今为止,大多数证据都来自大型试验的亚组分析,并且需要一项专门的随机试验来评估这两种干预措施在女性中的结果是否存在差异。RHEIA 试验将比较经股 TAVR 与 SAVR 在需要主动脉瓣介入治疗的严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的女性中的安全性和疗效,无论手术风险如何。

方法/设计:RHEIA 试验是一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究,将在欧洲的 35 个地点招募多达 440 名患者。患有严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄、具有任何但不具有手术禁忌风险状态的女性将被随机分为 1:1 组,分别接受经股 TAVR 治疗,使用 SAPIEN 3 或 SAPIEN 3 Ultra 装置或 SAVR,并随访 1 年。目的是确定 TAVR 在该患者人群中是否不劣于 SAVR,如果满足这一要求,TAVR 是否实际上优于 SAVR。主要安全性/疗效终点是术后 1 年时全因死亡率、所有中风和再住院(因瓣膜或手术相关症状或充血性心力衰竭恶化)的复合终点。其他结果(在 30 天和/或 1 年评估)包括全因死亡率;出血、血管、心脏、脑血管和肾脏并发症;主动脉瓣假体和左心室功能;认知功能、健康状况和生活质量。

讨论

RHEIA 研究旨在专门评估 TAVR 与 SAVR 在严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄女性中的安全性和疗效,无论手术风险水平如何。结果将首次提供特定的随机证据,以指导女性严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗选择。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov:NCT04160130。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验