Suppr超能文献

p16(INK4a)细胞学检查在宫颈癌早期诊断中的价值

[The value of p16(INK4a) cytology for early diagnosis of cervical cancer].

作者信息

Duan L F, Du H, Xiao A M, Wang C, Yan P S, Huang X, Wu R F

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Key Laboratory on Technology for Early Diagnosis of Major Gynecological Diseases, Shenzhen 518036, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 8;49(8):812-815. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20191203-00779.

Abstract

To investigate the use of p16(INK4a) immuno-stained cytology as the primary screening for cervical cancer prevention. From March to August 2018, 902 women from Shenzhen and surrounding area were recruited for cervical cancer screening with ThinPrep Cytologic Test (TCT), cobas4800 HPV test, and p16(INK4a) co-test. Colpo/biopsies were performed using the point of interest biopsy protocol of directed and random cervical biopsies plus endocervical curettage for all women, any of whose tests was positive. Two senior cytopathologists interpreted TCT and p16(INK4a) test. The performance of p16(INK4a) for early detection of CIN2+ and inter-observer reproducibility of the interpretation of p16(INK4a) were evaluated. The positive rates of HPV test, p16(INK4a) co-test and TCT diagnosed as LSIL/AGC or higher grade were 8.1% (73/902), 6.8% (61/902) and 4.7% (42/902), respectively. Colposcopy referring rate was 79.6% (109/137), among which 10 cases were diagnosed as CIN2+ (5 cases of CIN2 and 5 cases of CIN3). The sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ of p16(INK4a) test, TCT (LSIL/AGC or higher grade) and HPV test were 90.0%, 80.0%, 100.0% and 90.9%, 91.9%, 82.5%, respectively. Compared to TCT and HPV test, there was no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between p16(INK4a) and TCT/HPV test (0.05). The Kappa value of the 2 cytopathologists in interpreting p16(INK4a) and TCT was 0.944 and 0.425, respectively (0.05). p16(INK4a) for cervical cancer screening is equally sensitive to HPV test and specific to TCT while subjective difference of cytopathologists' interpretation of p16(INK4a) is small. Therefore, p16(INK4a) can be used as a new cervical cancer screen method for its better diagnostic performance.

摘要

探讨采用p16(INK4a)免疫染色细胞学作为宫颈癌预防的初筛方法。2018年3月至8月,招募了902名来自深圳及周边地区的女性进行宫颈癌筛查,采用薄层液基细胞学检测(TCT)、cobas4800 HPV检测和p16(INK4a)联合检测。对所有检测结果为阳性的女性,采用定向和随机宫颈活检加宫颈管刮术的感兴趣点活检方案进行阴道镜检查/活检。两名资深细胞病理学家解读TCT和p16(INK4a)检测结果。评估p16(INK4a)在早期检测CIN2+中的性能以及p16(INK4a)解读的观察者间重复性。HPV检测、p16(INK4a)联合检测和TCT诊断为低度鳞状上皮内病变/非典型腺细胞或更高等级的阳性率分别为8.1%(73/902)、6.8%(61/902)和4.7%(42/902)。阴道镜转诊率为79.6%(109/137),其中10例被诊断为CIN2+(5例CIN2和5例CIN3)。p16(INK4a)检测、TCT(低度鳞状上皮内病变/非典型腺细胞或更高等级)和HPV检测对CIN2+的敏感性和特异性分别为90.0%、80.0%、100.0%和90.9%、91.9%、82.5%。与TCT和HPV检测相比,p16(INK4a)与TCT/HPV检测在敏感性和特异性方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。两名细胞病理学家解读p16(INK4a)和TCT的Kappa值分别为0.944和0.425(P>0.05)。p16(INK4a)用于宫颈癌筛查对HPV检测同样敏感,对TCT同样特异,且细胞病理学家对p16(INK4a)解读的主观差异较小。因此,p16(INK4a)因其更好的诊断性能可作为一种新的宫颈癌筛查方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验