Suppr超能文献

培训识别创伤急救中的红色信号:哪些患者尽管预后相对较好,但仍有早期死亡风险?来自创伤登记处 DGU®的分析。

Training to identify red flags in the acute care of trauma: who are the patients at risk for early death despite a relatively good prognosis? An analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Center for Public Health and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug 3;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00325-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the acute care of trauma, some patients with a low estimated risk of death die suddenly and unexpectedly. In this study, we aim to identify predictors for early death within 24 h following hospital admission in low-risk patients.

METHODS

The TraumaRegister DGU® was used to collect records of patients who were primarily treated in a participating hospital between 2004 and 2013 with a RISC II score below 10%.

RESULTS

During the study period, 64,379 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean RISC II score was 2.0%, and the mean ISS was 16 ± 9. The overall hospital mortality rate was 2.1%, and 0.5% of patients (n = 301) died within the first 24 h. A SPB of ≤ 90 mmHg was associated with an increased risk of death (p < 0.001). An AIS abdomen score of ≥ 3 was associated with increased risk of death within the first 24 h (p < 0.001). A high risk of early death was also seen in patients with an AIS score (thorax) ≥ 3; 51% of those who died died within the first 24 h (p < 0.005). Death in patients over 60 years was more common after 24 h (p < 0.001). Patients with an ASA score of ≥ 3 were more likely to die after the first 24 h (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Indicators predicting a high risk of early death in patients with a low RISC II score include a SPB ≤ 90 mmHg and severe chest and abdominal trauma. Emergency teams involved in the acute care of trauma patients should be aware of these "red flags" and treat their patients accordingly.

摘要

背景

在创伤的急症护理中,一些预计死亡风险低的患者会突然且意外地死亡。本研究旨在确定低风险患者入院后 24 小时内早期死亡的预测因素。

方法

使用创伤登记处 DGU® 收集 2004 年至 2013 年期间在参与医院主要接受治疗且 RISC II 评分低于 10%的患者记录。

结果

在研究期间,有 64379 名患者符合纳入标准。平均 RISC II 评分为 2.0%,ISS 平均为 16 ± 9。总的住院死亡率为 2.1%,0.5%的患者(n=301)在入院后 24 小时内死亡。收缩压(SPB)≤90mmHg 与死亡风险增加相关(p<0.001)。腹部损伤严重度评分(AIS)≥3 与入院后 24 小时内死亡风险增加相关(p<0.001)。AIS 评分(胸部)≥3 的患者也有较高的早期死亡风险;51%的死亡患者在入院后 24 小时内死亡(p<0.005)。60 岁以上患者死亡更常见于入院后 24 小时后(p<0.001)。ASA 评分≥3 的患者在入院后 24 小时内更有可能死亡(p<0.001)。

结论

预测低 RISC II 评分患者早期死亡风险高的指标包括 SPB≤90mmHg 和严重的胸部和腹部创伤。参与创伤急症患者护理的急救团队应注意这些“警示信号”并相应地治疗患者。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
The contemporary timing of trauma deaths.创伤死亡的当代时间模式。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jun;84(6):893-899. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001882.
7
Is there a 'weekend effect' in major trauma?重大创伤中存在“周末效应”吗?
Emerg Med J. 2016 Dec;33(12):836-842. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206049. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
Epidemiology of in-hospital trauma deaths.院内创伤死亡的流行病学
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Feb;38(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-011-0168-4. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验