Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1, Hunter Region Mail Centre, Newcastle, NSW, 2310, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug 3;15(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00319-y.
Recent trauma guidelines recommend non-operative management for grade III splenic injury without contrast extravasation on computed tomography. Nevertheless, such recommendations rely on low-quality evidence, and practice variation characterizes clinical management for this type of injury. We aimed to identify the role of eleven selected clinical factors influencing the management of grade III splenic injury without contrast extravasation by expert consensus and a modified Delphi approach.
A questionnaire was developed with the endorsement of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). This was delivered and answered live by acute care surgeons attending the 6 WSES congress in Nijmegen in 2019. A dedicated mobile phone application was utilized to collect the answers. All answers were evaluated for areas of discrepancy with an 80% threshold for consensus between respondents.
Three factors generated discrepancy in opinion for managing this pattern of injury: the patients' injury severity, the presence of a bleeding diathesis, and an associated intra-abdominal injury. Agreement was obtained for the other eight factors.
Researchers should focus their efforts on the identified area of discrepancy. Clinicians should use additional care in the presence of the three factors for which discordant opinions were found.
最近的创伤指南建议在 CT 上无对比外渗的情况下对 III 级脾损伤进行非手术治疗。然而,这些建议依赖于低质量的证据,并且这种类型损伤的临床管理存在实践差异。我们旨在通过专家共识和改良 Delphi 方法确定十一个选定的临床因素在无对比外渗的 III 级脾损伤管理中的作用。
该问卷由世界急诊外科学会(WSES)认可制定。2019 年在奈梅亨举行的第 6 届 WSES 大会上,由急性护理外科医生现场提交和回答。专门的移动电话应用程序用于收集答案。对于意见不一致的所有答案,均进行评估,以确定在 80%的应答者之间存在一致性的区域。
有三个因素导致对这种损伤模式的管理意见不一致:患者的损伤严重程度、存在出血倾向和伴随的腹腔内损伤。对于其他八个因素达成了一致意见。
研究人员应将精力集中在确定的差异区域。对于发现意见不一致的三个因素,临床医生应更加谨慎。