• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年重性抑郁患者文拉法辛与 SSRI 治疗的耐受性和疗效。VESPA 研究方案:一项实用、多中心、开放标签、平行分组、优效性、随机试验。

Tolerability and efficacy of vortioxetine versus SSRIs in elderly with major depression. Study protocol of the VESPA study: a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority, randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Aug 3;21(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04460-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04460-6
PMID:32746941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7397635/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Depression is a highly prevalent condition in the elderly, with a vast impact on quality of life, life expectancy, and medical outcomes. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most commonly prescribed agents in this condition and, although generally safe, tolerability issues cannot be overlooked. Vortioxetine is an antidepressant with a novel mechanism of action. Based on studies to date, it may have a promising tolerability profile in the elderly, as it does not adversely affect psychomotor or cognitive performance and does not alter cardiovascular and endocrine parameters. The present study aims to assess the tolerability profile of vortioxetine in comparison with the SSRIs considered as a single group in elderly participants with depression. The rate of participants withdrawing from treatment due to adverse events after 6 months of follow up will be the primary outcome.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority, randomized trial funded by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA - Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco). Thirteen Italian Community Psychiatric Services will consecutively enrol elderly participants suffering from an episode of major depression over a period of 12 months. Participants will be assessed at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months of follow up. At each time point, the following validated rating scales will be administered: Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Antidepressant Side-Effect Checklist (ASEC), EuroQual 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Short Blessed Test (SBT), and Charlson Age-Comorbidity Index (CACI). Outcome assessors and the statistician will be masked to treatment allocation. A total of 358 participants (179 in each group) will be enrolled.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will fully adhere to the ICH E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Participants' data will be managed and safeguarded according to the European Data Protection Regulation 2016/679. An external Ethical Advisory Board will help guarantee high ethical standards.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03779789 , Registered on 19 December 2018. Submitted on 19 December. EudraCT number: 2018-001444-66.

TRIAL STATUS

Protocol version 1.5; 09/06/2018. Recruitment started In February 2019 and it is ongoing. It is expected to end approximately on 30 September 2021.

摘要

简介

抑郁症在老年人中是一种高发疾病,严重影响生活质量、预期寿命和医疗结果。选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)是治疗这种疾病最常用的药物,虽然通常安全,但也不能忽视其耐受性问题。文拉法辛是一种具有新型作用机制的抗抑郁药。根据目前的研究,它在老年人中可能具有有前景的耐受性特征,因为它不会对精神运动或认知表现产生不利影响,也不会改变心血管和内分泌参数。本研究旨在评估文拉法辛与 SSRIs 相比在老年抑郁症患者中的耐受性特征,SSRIs 作为一个单一的治疗组。6 个月随访后因不良反应退出治疗的参与者比例将是主要结局。

方法和分析

这是一项由意大利药品管理局(AIFA - Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco)资助的实用、多中心、开放标签、平行组、优效性、随机试验。13 家意大利社区精神病服务机构将在 12 个月内连续招募患有重度抑郁症发作的老年参与者。参与者将在基线和随访 1、3 和 6 个月时进行评估。在每个时间点,将使用以下经过验证的评分量表进行评估:蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)、抗抑郁药副作用检查表(ASEC)、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)、简短Blessed 测试(SBT)和 Charlson 年龄合并症指数(CACI)。结局评估者和统计人员将对治疗分配进行盲法评估。共纳入 358 名参与者(每组 179 名)。

伦理和传播

本研究将完全遵守 ICH E6 指导原则下的良好临床实践。参与者的数据将根据欧洲数据保护条例 2016/679 进行管理和保护。外部伦理咨询委员会将有助于保证高标准的伦理原则。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03779789,注册于 2018 年 12 月 19 日。提交于 2018 年 12 月 19 日。EudraCT 编号:2018-001444-66。

试验状态

方案版本 1.5;2018 年 6 月 9 日。招募于 2019 年 2 月开始,正在进行中。预计于 2021 年 9 月 30 日结束。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2d4/7397635/d5f498aadbbe/13063_2020_4460_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2d4/7397635/72cfb1b22d88/13063_2020_4460_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2d4/7397635/d69d5d5b27fe/13063_2020_4460_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2d4/7397635/d5f498aadbbe/13063_2020_4460_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2d4/7397635/72cfb1b22d88/13063_2020_4460_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2d4/7397635/d69d5d5b27fe/13063_2020_4460_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2d4/7397635/d5f498aadbbe/13063_2020_4460_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Tolerability and efficacy of vortioxetine versus SSRIs in elderly with major depression. Study protocol of the VESPA study: a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority, randomized trial.老年重性抑郁患者文拉法辛与 SSRI 治疗的耐受性和疗效。VESPA 研究方案:一项实用、多中心、开放标签、平行分组、优效性、随机试验。
Trials. 2020 Aug 3;21(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04460-6.
2
Tolerability of vortioxetine compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in older adults with major depressive disorder (VESPA): a randomised, assessor-blinded and statistician-blinded, multicentre, superiority trial.伏硫西汀与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗老年重度抑郁症的耐受性比较(VESPA):一项随机、评估者设盲和统计学家设盲的多中心优效性试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 15;69:102491. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102491. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Anti-inflammatory treatment of depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of vortioxetine augmented with celecoxib or placebo.抑郁症的抗炎治疗:伏硫西汀联合塞来昔布或安慰剂的随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2018 Aug 20;19(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2829-7.
4
Effect of Vortioxetine vs. Escitalopram on Sexual Functioning in Adults with Well-Treated Major Depressive Disorder Experiencing SSRI-Induced Sexual Dysfunction.伏硫西汀与艾司西酞普兰对已接受充分治疗但出现SSRI诱导性功能障碍的成人重度抑郁症患者性功能的影响。
J Sex Med. 2015 Oct;12(10):2036-48. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12980. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
5
Head-To-Head Comparison of Vortioxetine Versus Desvenlafaxine in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder With Partial Response to SSRI Therapy: Results of the VIVRE Study.SSRI 治疗部分反应的重性抑郁障碍患者文拉法辛与沃替西汀头对头比较:VIVRE 研究结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2023 May 22;84(4):23m14780. doi: 10.4088/JCP.23m14780.
6
A randomised, double-blind study in adults with major depressive disorder with an inadequate response to a single course of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor treatment switched to vortioxetine or agomelatine.一项针对重度抑郁症成人患者的随机双盲研究,这些患者对单一疗程的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂或5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂治疗反应不足,随后转而使用伏硫西汀或阿戈美拉汀。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2014 Sep;29(5):470-82. doi: 10.1002/hup.2424.
7
Randomized, 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vortioxetine in Japanese adults with major depressive disorder, followed by a 52-week open-label extension trial.一项为期 8 周的、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的研究,评估伏硫西汀在日本成年重度抑郁症患者中的疗效,随后进行了一项为期 52 周的开放标签扩展试验。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Feb;72(2):103-115. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12623. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
8
Comparison of vortioxetine versus venlafaxine XR in adults in Asia with major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind study.亚洲成年重度抑郁症患者中伏硫西汀与文拉法辛缓释剂的比较:一项随机双盲研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Apr;31(4):785-94. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1014028. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
9
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of vortioxetine 10 mg and 20 mg in adults with major depressive disorder.一项关于伏硫西汀 10mg 和 20mg 治疗成人重性抑郁障碍的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 May;76(5):575-82. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09335.
10
Relative efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine versus selected antidepressants by indirect comparisons of similar clinical studies.通过相似临床研究的间接比较,伏硫西汀与选定抗抑郁药的相对疗效和耐受性
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Dec;30(12):2589-606. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.969566. Epub 2014 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Tolerability of Vortioxetine Versus Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Late-Life Depression: A Post-hoc Analysis of the VESPA Study.伏硫西汀与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗老年期抑郁症的疗效及耐受性:VESPA研究的事后分析
Drugs Aging. 2025 Aug;42(8):771-780. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01231-3. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
2
Common Needs of Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease: Qualitative Analysis Based on Disease-Specific Social Media Platforms.糖尿病肾病患者的共同需求:基于特定疾病社交媒体平台的定性分析
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 5;18:1435-1441. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S459550. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of older adults with depression: questionable benefit and considerations for frailty.第二代抗抑郁药治疗老年抑郁症的系统评价和荟萃分析:疗效存疑且需考虑衰弱问题。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1327-4.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in older patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analysis.药物和非药物干预对老年重性抑郁障碍患者的疗效和耐受性:系统评价、两两比较和网络荟萃分析。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Sep;29(9):1003-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.07.130. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
Tolerability of vortioxetine compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in older adults with major depressive disorder (VESPA): a randomised, assessor-blinded and statistician-blinded, multicentre, superiority trial.
伏硫西汀与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗老年重度抑郁症的耐受性比较(VESPA):一项随机、评估者设盲和统计学家设盲的多中心优效性试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 15;69:102491. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102491. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Clinical trajectories of individuals with severe mental illness continuing and discontinuing long-acting antipsychotics: a one-year mirror-image analysis from the STAR Network Depot study.继续和停用长效抗精神病药物的严重精神疾病患者的临床轨迹:来自STAR网络长效注射剂研究的一年镜像分析
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 Apr 17;9(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00342-3.
5
Magnesium Potentiates the Vortioxetine's Effects on Physical Performances and Biological Changes in Exercise-Induced Stress in Rats.镁增强了沃替西汀对大鼠运动性应激相关生理变化和体能的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 28;58(10):1363. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101363.
6
Inhibitory Effectiveness in Delayed-Rectifier Potassium Current Caused by Vortioxetine, Known to Be a Novel Antidepressant.已知新型抗抑郁药伏硫西汀对延迟整流钾电流的抑制作用
Biomedicines. 2022 Jun 3;10(6):1318. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10061318.
7
Vortioxetine vs. Other Antidepressants in Patients with Major Depressive Episode With or Without Substance Use Disorder.文拉法辛与其他抗抑郁药治疗伴有或不伴有物质使用障碍的重性抑郁发作患者的比较
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2021;19(12):2296-2307. doi: 10.2174/1570159X19666210113150123.
Effect of clinically relevant doses of vortioxetine and citalopram on serotonergic PET markers in the nonhuman primate brain.
文拉法辛和西酞普兰的临床相关剂量对非人类灵长类动物大脑中 5-羟色胺能 PET 标志物的影响。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Sep;44(10):1706-1713. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0442-4. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
4
Vortioxetine: a novel antidepressant for the treatment of major depressive disorder.文拉法辛:一种新型抗抑郁药,用于治疗重度抑郁症。
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2019 Jan;14(1):81-89. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2019.1546691. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
5
The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive dysfunction in patients with inadequate response to current antidepressants in major depressive disorder: A short-term, randomized, double-blind, exploratory study versus escitalopram.文拉法辛治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效:一项短期、随机、双盲、探索性研究 在重度抑郁症患者中,文拉法辛对当前抗抑郁药反应不足的认知功能障碍的影响:与艾司西酞普兰的短期、随机、双盲、探索性研究。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:803-809. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.053. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
6
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?真实世界证据:被标记为实用的随机对照试验有多么实用?
BMC Med. 2018 Apr 3;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1038-2.
7
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Depression in Elderly.老年抑郁症管理临床实践指南
Indian J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;60(Suppl 3):S341-S362. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.224474.
8
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 种抗抑郁药治疗成人重度抑郁症的急性治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive performance in working patients with major depressive disorder: A short-term, randomized, double-blind, exploratory study.文拉法辛对伴发抑郁障碍的工作患者认知表现的影响:一项短期、随机、双盲、探索性研究。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:421-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.056. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
10
A systematic review of interventions to prevent suicidal behaviors and reduce suicidal ideation in older people.老年人自杀行为预防和自杀意念干预措施的系统评价
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Nov;29(11):1801-1824. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217001430. Epub 2017 Aug 2.