Field Robert D, Luo Ming, Fromm Mike, Voulgarakis Apostolos, Mangeon Stéphane, Worden John
NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA.
Dept. of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
J Geophys Res Atmos. 2016 Apr 27;121(8):4296-4316. doi: 10.1002/2015jd024343. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
We simulated the high-altitude smoke plume from the early February 2009 Black Saturday bushfires in southeastern Australia using the NASA GISS ModelE2. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first single-plume analysis of biomass burning emissions injected directly into the upper-troposphere/lower stratosphere (UTLS) using a full-complexity composition-climate model. We compared simulated carbon monoxide (CO) to a new Aura TES/MLS joint CO retrieval, focusing on the plume's initial transport eastward, anticyclonic circulation to the north of New Zealand, westward transport in the lower stratospheric easterlies, and arrival over Africa at the end of February. Our goal was to determine the sensitivity of the simulated plume to prescribed injection height, emissions amount and emissions timing from different sources for a full complexity model when compared to Aura. The most realistic plumes were obtained using injection heights in the UTLS, including one drawn from ground-based radar data. A six-hour emissions pulse or emissions tied to independent estimates of hourly fire behavior produced a more realistic plume in the lower stratosphere compared to the same emissions amount being released evenly over 12 or 24-hours. Simulated CO in the plume was highly sensitive to the differences between emissions amounts estimated from the Global Fire Emissions Database and from detailed, ground-based estimates of fire growth. The emissions amount determined not only the CO concentration of the plume, but the proportion of the plume that entered the stratosphere. We speculate that this is due to either or both non-linear CO loss with a weakened OH sink, or plume self-lofting driven by shortwave absorption of the co-emitted aerosols.
我们使用美国国家航空航天局戈达德空间研究所的ModelE2模型,模拟了2009年2月初澳大利亚东南部“黑色星期六”丛林大火产生的高空烟羽。据我们所知,这是首次使用全复杂度成分气候模型对直接注入对流层上部/平流层下部(UTLS)的生物质燃烧排放进行单烟羽分析。我们将模拟的一氧化碳(CO)与新的奥拉卫星(Aura)对流层排放光谱仪(TES)/微波临边探测仪(MLS)联合反演的一氧化碳数据进行了比较,重点关注烟羽最初向东的传输、新西兰北部的反气旋环流、平流层低层东风带中的向西传输以及2月底到达非洲的情况。我们的目标是确定与奥拉卫星数据相比,对于全复杂度模型,模拟烟羽对规定的注入高度、排放总量和不同源的排放时间的敏感性。使用UTLS中的注入高度可得到最逼真的烟羽,其中一个高度是根据地基雷达数据得出的。与在12或24小时内均匀释放相同排放量相比,6小时的排放脉冲或与每小时火灾行为独立估计值相关的排放,在平流层下部产生了更逼真的烟羽。烟羽中模拟的一氧化碳对全球火灾排放数据库估计的排放量与详细的地面火灾增长估计值之间的差异高度敏感。排放总量不仅决定了烟羽中的一氧化碳浓度,还决定了进入平流层的烟羽比例。我们推测,这是由于OH汇减弱导致一氧化碳非线性损失,或者是共排放气溶胶的短波吸收驱动烟羽自我抬升,或两者兼而有之。