Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Municipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;41(10):1169-1177. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.319. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
To assess the effect of a multimodal intervention on hand hygiene compliance (HHC) in nursing homes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: HHC was evaluated using direct, unobtrusive observation in a cluster randomized controlled trial at publicly funded nursing homes in the Netherlands. In total, 103 nursing home organizations were invited to participate; 18 organizations comprising 33 nursing homes (n = 66 nursing home units) participated in the study. Nursing homes were randomized into a control group (no intervention, n = 30) or an intervention group (multimodal intervention, n = 36). The primary outcome measure was HHC of nurses. HHC was appraised at baseline and at 4, 7, and 12 months after baseline. Observers and nurses were blinded.
Audits regarding hand hygiene (HH) materials and personal hygiene rules, 3 live lessons, an e-learning program, posters, and a photo contest. We used a new method to teach the nurses the WHO-defined 5 moments of HH: Room In, Room Out, Before Clean, and After Dirty.
HHC increased in both arms. The increase after 12 months was larger for units in the intervention arm (from 12% to 36%) than for control units (from 13% to 21%) (odds ratio [OR], 2.10; confidence interval [CI], 1.35-3.28). The intervention arm exhibited a statistically significant increase in HHC at 4 of the 5 WHO-defined HH moments. At follow-up, HHC in the intervention arm remained statistically significantly higher (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.59-2.34) for indications after an activity (from 37% to 39%) than for indications before an activity (from 14% to 27%).
The HANDSOME intervention is successful in improving HHC in nursing homes.
评估多模式干预对养老院手卫生依从性(HHC)的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:在荷兰,通过对公共资助的养老院进行集群随机对照试验,使用直接、非干扰性观察来评估 HHC。共有 103 家养老院机构受邀参加;18 家机构(共 33 家养老院)参与了研究。养老院被随机分为对照组(无干预,n = 30)或干预组(多模式干预,n = 36)。主要结局指标为护士的 HHC。在基线和基线后 4、7 和 12 个月评估 HHC。观察者和护士均不知情。
对 HH 材料和个人卫生规则进行审核,3 次现场授课,电子学习计划,海报和照片竞赛。我们使用一种新方法教授护士世卫组织定义的 5 个 HH 时刻:进入房间、离开房间、清洁前、清洁后和脏污后。
两个组的 HHC 均有所增加。干预组的增加幅度更大(从 12%增加到 36%),而对照组则从 13%增加到 21%(比值比[OR],2.10;置信区间[CI],1.35-3.28)。干预组在 5 个世卫组织定义的 HH 时刻中的 4 个时刻显示出 HHC 的统计学显著增加。在随访时,干预组的 HHC 仍然在活动后(从 37%增加到 39%)的指征中保持统计学显著更高(OR,1.93;95%CI,1.59-2.34),而在活动前(从 14%增加到 27%)的指征中则较低。
HANDSOME 干预成功地提高了养老院的 HHC。