• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于出行指数分类的公共自行车共享系统数据驱动分析。

Data-Driven Analysis of Bicycle Sharing Systems as Public Transport Systems Based on a Trip Index Classification.

机构信息

Group Biometry, Biosignals, Security, and Smart Mobility, Departamento de Matemática Aplicada a las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Complutense 30, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

Grupo de Investigación en Planificación del Transporte, Transport Research Centre (TRANSyT), Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 2;20(15):4315. doi: 10.3390/s20154315.

DOI:10.3390/s20154315
PMID:32748867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7436302/
Abstract

Bicycle Sharing Systems (BSSs) are exponentially increasing in the urban mobility sector. They are traditionally conceived as a last-mile complement to the public transport system. In this paper, we demonstrate that BSSs can be seen as a public transport system in their own right. To do so, we build a mathematical framework for the classification of BSS trips. Using trajectory information, we create the , which characterizes the intrinsic purpose of the use of BSS as or . The construction of the trip index required a specific analysis of the BSS shortest path, which cannot be directly calculated from the topology of the network given that cyclists can find shortcuts through traffic lights, pedestrian crossings, etc. to reduce the overall traveled distance. Adding a layer of complication to the problem, these shortcuts have a non-trivial existence in terms of being intermittent, or short lived. We applied the proposed methodology to empirical data from BiciMAD, the public BSS in Madrid (Spain). The obtained results show that the trip index correctly determines transport and leisure categories, which exhibit distinct statistical and operational features. Finally, we inferred the underlying BSS public transport network and show the fundamental trajectories traveled by users. Based on this analysis, we conclude that 90.60% of BiciMAD's use fall in the category of transport, which demonstrates our first statement.

摘要

自行车共享系统 (BSS) 在城市交通领域呈指数级增长。它们传统上被认为是公共交通系统的最后一英里补充。在本文中,我们证明 BSS 本身可以被视为公共交通系统。为此,我们构建了一个用于 BSS 行程分类的数学框架。使用轨迹信息,我们创建了 ,它将 BSS 使用的内在目的描述为通勤或休闲。行程指数的构建需要对 BSS 最短路径进行特定分析,由于自行车可以通过交通信号灯、行人横道等找到捷径来减少总行驶距离,因此无法直接从网络拓扑结构计算出最短路径。这些捷径的存在具有间歇性或短暂性,使问题更加复杂。我们将提出的方法应用于来自马德里公共 BSS(西班牙马德里的 BiciMAD)的实证数据。得到的结果表明,行程指数可以正确确定通勤和休闲类别,这些类别具有明显的统计和运营特征。最后,我们推断出 BSS 公共交通网络的基础,并展示了用户所行驶的基本轨迹。基于此分析,我们得出结论,90.60%的 BiciMAD 使用情况属于通勤类别,这证明了我们的第一个陈述。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/eae91fe64b39/sensors-20-04315-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/71347d65fd12/sensors-20-04315-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/a11dfe99c8f4/sensors-20-04315-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/67de4571907a/sensors-20-04315-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/69c54f037205/sensors-20-04315-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/d4a739323e27/sensors-20-04315-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/eae91fe64b39/sensors-20-04315-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/71347d65fd12/sensors-20-04315-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/a11dfe99c8f4/sensors-20-04315-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/67de4571907a/sensors-20-04315-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/69c54f037205/sensors-20-04315-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/d4a739323e27/sensors-20-04315-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8aa/7436302/eae91fe64b39/sensors-20-04315-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Data-Driven Analysis of Bicycle Sharing Systems as Public Transport Systems Based on a Trip Index Classification.基于出行指数分类的公共自行车共享系统数据驱动分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 2;20(15):4315. doi: 10.3390/s20154315.
2
Statistical patterns of human mobility in emerging Bicycle Sharing Systems.新兴共享单车系统中人类移动的统计模式。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0193795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193795. eCollection 2018.
3
Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering of Bicycle Sharing Stations Based on Ultra-Light Edge Computing.基于超轻边缘计算的自行车共享站层次聚类。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 23;20(12):3550. doi: 10.3390/s20123550.
4
The strengths and weaknesses of bike sharing as an alternative mode during disruptive public health crisis: A qualitative analysis on the users' motivations during COVID-19.共享单车作为突发公共卫生危机期间替代出行方式的优缺点:对新冠疫情期间用户动机的定性分析
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2022 Dec;129:24-37. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.026. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
5
Health impacts of bike sharing systems in Europe.欧洲共享单车系统的健康影响。
Environ Int. 2018 Jun;115:387-394. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
6
The motivations for using bike sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Lisbon.新冠疫情期间使用共享单车的动机:来自里斯本的见解。
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2021 Oct;82:378-399. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.09.016. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
7
The link between bike sharing and subway use during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case-study of New York's Citi Bike.新冠疫情期间共享单车与地铁使用之间的联系:纽约花旗单车的案例研究
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
8
Divide-and-train: A new approach to improve the predictive tasks of bike-sharing systems.分割训练:一种改进共享单车系统预测任务的新方法。
Math Biosci Eng. 2024 Jul 2;21(7):6471-6492. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024282.
9
Health impacts of bike-sharing systems in the U.S.美国共享单车系统的健康影响
Environ Res. 2021 Nov;202:111709. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111709. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
10
The effects of COVID-19 on female and male bike sharing users: Insights from Lisbon's .新冠疫情对共享单车男女用户的影响:来自里斯本的见解 。 (原文句子不完整,推测后面可能还有关于里斯本的具体内容)
Cities. 2023 Jan;132:104058. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104058. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Intelligent Transportation Related Complex Systems and Sensors.智能交通相关复杂系统与传感器。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 23;21(6):2235. doi: 10.3390/s21062235.

本文引用的文献

1
Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering of Bicycle Sharing Stations Based on Ultra-Light Edge Computing.基于超轻边缘计算的自行车共享站层次聚类。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 23;20(12):3550. doi: 10.3390/s20123550.
2
The Shared Bicycle and Its Network-Internet of Shared Bicycle (IoSB): A Review and Survey.共享单车及其网络——共享单车物联网(IoSB):综述与调查
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Aug 7;18(8):2581. doi: 10.3390/s18082581.
3
A Dynamic Approach to Rebalancing Bike-Sharing Systems.一种重新平衡共享单车系统的动态方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Feb 8;18(2):512. doi: 10.3390/s18020512.
4
A Multilayer perspective for the analysis of urban transportation systems.从多层角度分析城市交通系统。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 15;7:44359. doi: 10.1038/srep44359.
5
Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century.塑造健康城市:复杂性与21世纪城市环境规划
Lancet. 2012 Jun 2;379(9831):2079-108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60435-8. Epub 2012 May 30.
6
Understanding individual human mobility patterns.理解个体的人类移动模式。
Nature. 2008 Jun 5;453(7196):779-82. doi: 10.1038/nature06958.