• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What patients with lung cancer with comorbidity tell us about interprofessional collaborative care across healthcare sectors: qualitative interview study.患有合并症的肺癌患者对跨医疗保健部门的多专业协作式护理的看法:定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 4;10(8):e036495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036495.
2
The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.针对预后小于12个月患者的海德堡里程碑式沟通方法(MCA):一项包括随机对照试验的混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Aug 14;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1.
3
Consideration of sense of coherence in a structured communication approach with stage IV lung cancer patients and their informal caregivers: a qualitative interview study.在与 IV 期肺癌患者及其非专业照护者进行结构化沟通的过程中考虑应对感:一项定性访谈研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Apr;29(4):2153-2159. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05724-2. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
Cross-sectoral cancer care: views from patients and health care professionals regarding a personal electronic health record.跨部门癌症护理:患者和医疗保健专业人员对个人电子健康记录的看法。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Mar;26(2). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12429. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
5
Perceptions of conflicting information about long-term medications: a qualitative in-depth interview study of patients with chronic diseases in the Swiss ambulatory care system.关于长期用药的矛盾信息认知:瑞士门诊医疗体系中慢性病患者的定性深入访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 8;13(11):e070468. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070468.
6
Challenges to cross-sectoral care experienced by professionals working with patients living with low back pain: a qualitative interview study.跨部门护理面临的挑战:与腰痛患者合作的专业人员的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4988-y.
7
Patient experiences of interprofessional collaboration and intersectoral communication in rare disease healthcare in Germany - a mixed-methods study.德国罕见病医疗中患者对多专业协作和跨部门沟通的体验——一项混合方法研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 May 13;19(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03207-9.
8
Healthcare professionals' experiences and attitudes to care coordination across health sectors: an interview study.医疗保健专业人员在跨卫生部门协调照护方面的经验和态度:一项访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03200-6.
9
Exploring challenges in the patient's discharge process from the internal medicine service: A qualitative study of patients' and providers' perceptions.探索内科服务中患者出院流程的挑战:一项关于患者和医护人员看法的定性研究
J Interprof Care. 2017 Sep;31(5):566-574. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1322562. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
10
"It is two worlds" cross-sectoral nurse collaboration related to care transitions: A qualitative study.“两个世界”跨部门护士在护理转接方面的协作:一项定性研究
J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):1999-2008. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14805. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Difficulties in Care and Unmet Needs from the Perspective of Patients with Lung Cancer and Stroke - A Qualitative Study in Germany.从肺癌和中风患者角度看护理困难与未满足的需求——德国的一项定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Mar 27;19:791-804. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S493568. eCollection 2025.
2
Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers.泛癌种分析 109 种预先存在的疾病与 19 种成人癌症的治疗模式之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51161-0.
3
What do people with lung cancer and stroke expect from patient navigation? A qualitative study in Germany.肺癌和中风患者对患者导航有何期望?德国的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 23;11(12):e050601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050601.
4
International consensus on severe lung cancer-the first edition.《严重肺癌国际共识》第一版
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jun;10(6):2633-2666. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-467.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance access to specialist care: a scoping review.实施电子会诊(eConsult)以增加专科护理可及性的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Sep 13;4(5):e001629. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001629. eCollection 2019.
2
Shared decision-making in outpatients with mental disorders: Patients´ preferences and associated factors.门诊精神障碍患者的共同决策:患者的偏好和相关因素。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1200-1209. doi: 10.1111/jep.13246. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
3
Informal caregiver quality of life in a palliative oncology population.姑息肿瘤学人群中非正式照护者的生活质量。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):1695-1702. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04970-3. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
4
Electronic referral systems in health care: a scoping review.医疗保健中的电子转诊系统:一项范围综述。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 May 6;11:325-333. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S195597. eCollection 2019.
5
General practitioners' perspectives on care coordination in primary health care: A qualitative study.全科医生对初级卫生保健中护理协调的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Care Coord. 2018 Dec;21(4):153-159. doi: 10.1177/2053434518816792. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2018 Nov;160(Suppl 3):20-22. doi: 10.1007/s15006-018-1108-6.
7
Improving cooperation between general practitioners and dermatologists via telemedicine: study protocol of the cluster-randomized controlled TeleDerm study.通过远程医疗改善全科医生与皮肤科医生之间的合作:整群随机对照TeleDerm研究方案
Trials. 2018 Oct 24;19(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2955-2.
8
The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.针对预后小于12个月患者的海德堡里程碑式沟通方法(MCA):一项包括随机对照试验的混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Aug 14;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1.
9
Challenges in supporting lay carers of patients at the end of life: results from focus group discussions with primary healthcare providers.临终患者非专业护理人员支持方面的挑战:与初级医疗服务提供者焦点小组讨论的结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 13;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0816-4.
10
The impact of health information exchange on healthcare quality and cost-effectiveness: A systematic literature review.健康信息交换对医疗质量和成本效益的影响:系统文献回顾。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Jul;161:209-232. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 Apr 28.

患有合并症的肺癌患者对跨医疗保健部门的多专业协作式护理的看法:定性访谈研究。

What patients with lung cancer with comorbidity tell us about interprofessional collaborative care across healthcare sectors: qualitative interview study.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Service Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

Department of General Practice and Health Service Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 4;10(8):e036495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036495.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036495
PMID:32753449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7406021/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with lung cancer with comorbidity often require treatment and care by different health professionals, in different settings and at different points in time during the course of the disease. In order to organise and coordinate healthcare efficiently, effective information exchange and collaboration between all involved care providers are required. The aim of this study was to assess the views of patients with advanced lung cancer with comorbidity regarding coordination of treatment and care across healthcare sectors.

METHODS

This qualitative study, as part of the main study, The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach, used face-to-face guide-based semistructured interviews with patients with advanced lung cancer and their informal caregivers to explore cross-sectoral information exchange and collaboration in Germany. All generated data were audio-recorded, pseudonymised and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was performed using qualitative content analysis to structure data into themes and subthemes. All data were managed and organised in MAXQDA.

RESULTS

In 15 interviews, participants reported that cross-sectoral collaboration functioned well, if treatments occurred as planned. However, treatment gaps were experienced, especially regarding medication and regimen. As a result, participants felt insecure and obliged to take responsibility for the coordination of healthcare. Patients reported to be in favour of an active patient role but felt that healthcare coordination should still be a responsibility of a care provider. A more intensive information exchange, potentially by using an electronic platform, was expected to strengthen cross-sectoral collaboration.

CONCLUSION

Patients with lung cancer are uncertain about their role in the coordination of treatment and care across healthcare sectors. Healthcare providers should be more aware of care recipients' willingness of taking on a more active role in healthcare coordination.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00013469.

摘要

背景

患有合并症的肺癌患者通常需要不同的卫生专业人员在不同的环境中在疾病过程中的不同时间进行治疗和护理。为了有效地组织和协调医疗保健,所有相关护理提供者之间需要进行有效的信息交流和协作。本研究的目的是评估患有合并症的晚期肺癌患者对跨医疗保健部门治疗和护理协调的看法。

方法

作为主要研究的一部分,这项定性研究使用面对面的基于指南的半结构化访谈,对患有晚期肺癌的患者及其非正式照顾者进行了访谈,以探讨德国跨部门的信息交流和协作。所有生成的数据均进行了录音、匿名处理和逐字转录。使用定性内容分析对数据进行分析,将数据构建为主题和子主题。所有数据均在 MAXQDA 中进行管理和组织。

结果

在 15 次访谈中,参与者报告说,如果治疗按计划进行,跨部门的协作运作良好。然而,他们经历了治疗间隙,特别是在药物和方案方面。因此,参与者感到不安,有责任协调医疗保健。患者报告支持积极的患者角色,但认为医疗保健协调仍然是护理提供者的责任。更密集的信息交流,可能通过使用电子平台,有望加强跨部门的协作。

结论

肺癌患者对他们在跨医疗保健部门治疗和护理协调中的角色不确定。医疗保健提供者应该更加意识到护理接受者愿意在医疗保健协调中发挥更积极的作用。

试验注册号

DRKS00013469。