Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Sep 1;124(3):763-773. doi: 10.1152/jn.00273.2020. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
Data from studies of elbow-flexor (EF) or knee-extensor (KE) muscles suggest that a fatigue-related decrease in motoneuron excitability only occurs in EF. It is unknown how motoneuron excitability changes after sustained fatiguing maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) in EF and KE in the same participants. In two sessions, eight healthy men performed a 2-min MVIC of EF or KE to induce fatigue with brief MVICs before and six times after the 2-min MVIC. Electromyographic responses elicited by corticospinal tract stimulation at the transmastoid [cervicomedullary motor-evoked potential (CMEP)] or thoracic [thoracic motor-evoked potential (TMEP)] level were recorded from EF and KE, respectively. To account for muscle excitability, CMEPs and TMEPs were normalized to maximal M-wave (M) elicited by peripheral nerve stimulation during each brief MVIC. Immediately after the 2-min MVIC, biceps brachii and brachioradialis CMEP/M were 88% (SD 11%) ( = 0.026) and 87% (SD 12%) ( = 0.029) of pre-MVIC (PRE) values, respectively, and remained lower than PRE after 5 s of recovery [91% (SD 8%), = 0.036 and 87% (SD 13%), = 0.046, respectively]. No subsequent time points differed from PRE (all ≥ 0.253). TMEP/M for rectus femoris and vastus lateralis were not different from PRE at any time during the recovery period (all > 0.050). A different recovery pattern in motoneuron excitability occurred in EF as it recovered by 60 s whereas KE motoneurons were unaffected by the fatiguing task. The present findings may contribute to better understand muscle-specific neurophysiological differences in spinal excitability. By comparing the changes in motoneuron excitability in elbow-flexor and knee-extensor muscles after sustained fatiguing maximal voluntary contractions, this study shows that motoneuron recovery behavior depends on the muscle performing the exercise. A different recovery pattern in motoneuron excitability occurs in elbow flexors as it recovered by 60 s whereas knee extensors were unaffected by fatigue. This finding can help to increase understanding of the effect of a fatigue and subsequent recovery on neural processes.
来自对肘屈肌(EF)或膝伸肌(KE)肌肉的研究数据表明,与疲劳相关的运动神经元兴奋性降低仅发生在 EF 中。目前尚不清楚在同一参与者中,EF 和 KE 进行持续疲劳的最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)后,运动神经元兴奋性如何变化。在两次会议中,八名健康男性进行了 2 分钟的 EF 或 KE 的 MVIC,以通过短暂的 MVIC 在 2 分钟 MVIC 之前和之后六次诱发疲劳。通过经颅 [颈髓运动诱发电位(CMEP)] 或胸 [胸运动诱发电位(TMEP)] 水平的皮质脊髓束刺激从 EF 和 KE 分别记录肌电图反应。为了考虑肌肉兴奋性,CMEP 和 TMEP 分别相对于外周神经刺激在每个短暂 MVIC 中引起的最大 M 波(M)进行归一化。在 2 分钟 MVIC 后,肱二头肌和肱桡肌的 CMEP/M 分别为预 MVIC(PRE)值的 88%(SD 11%)( = 0.026)和 87%(SD 12%)( = 0.029),并且在 5 秒的恢复后仍低于 PRE[91%(SD 8%), = 0.036 和 87%(SD 13%), = 0.046,分别]。此后没有任何时间点与 PRE 不同(所有 ≥ 0.253)。在恢复期间的任何时间,股直肌和股外侧肌的 TMEP/M 均与 PRE 无差异(所有 > 0.050)。EF 中的运动神经元兴奋性恢复模式不同,因为它在 60 秒时恢复,而 KE 运动神经元不受疲劳任务的影响。本研究结果可能有助于更好地理解脊髓兴奋性中肌肉特异性神经生理学差异。通过比较持续疲劳的最大自主收缩后肘屈肌和膝伸肌运动神经元兴奋性的变化,本研究表明,运动神经元恢复行为取决于进行运动的肌肉。EF 中的运动神经元兴奋性恢复模式不同,因为它在 60 秒时恢复,而 KE 则不受疲劳的影响。这一发现有助于增加对疲劳和随后恢复对神经过程的影响的理解。