Vernillo Gianluca, Khassetarash Arash, Millet Guillaume Y, Temesi John
Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jan;239(1):205-216. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05921-9. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
We examined whether transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to the motor cortex allows assessment of muscle relaxation rates in unfatigued and fatigued knee extensors (KE). We assessed the ability of this technique to measure time course of fatigue-induced changes in muscle relaxation rate and compared relaxation rate from resting twitches evoked by femoral nerve stimulation. Twelve healthy men performed maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVC) twice before (PRE) and once at the end of a 2-min KE MVC and five more times within 8 min during recovery. Relative (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC) and absolute (repeatability coefficient) reliability and variability (coefficient of variation) were assessed. Time course of fatigue-induced changes in muscle relaxation rate was tested with generalized estimating equations. In unfatigued KE, peak relaxation rate coefficient of variation and repeatability coefficient were similar for both techniques. Mean (95% CI) ICC for peak relaxation rates were 0.933 (0.724-0.982) and 0.889 (0.603-0.968) for TMS and femoral nerve stimulation, respectively. TMS-induced normalized muscle relaxation rate was - 11.5 ± 2.5 s at PRE, decreased to - 6.9 ± 1.2 s (- 37 ± 17%, P < 0.001), and recovered by 2 min post-exercise. Normalized peak relaxation rate for resting twitch did not show a fatigue-induced change. During fatiguing KE exercise, the change in muscle relaxation rate as determined by the two techniques was different. TMS provides reliable values of muscle relaxation rates. Furthermore, it is sufficiently sensitive and more appropriate than the resting twitch evoked by femoral nerve stimulation to reveal fatigue-induced changes in KE.
我们研究了经颅磁刺激(TMS)作用于运动皮层是否能够评估未疲劳和疲劳状态下的膝伸肌(KE)的肌肉放松速率。我们评估了该技术测量疲劳诱导的肌肉放松速率变化的时间过程的能力,并比较了股神经刺激诱发的静息抽搐的放松速率。12名健康男性在两次最大自主等长收缩(MVC)之前(PRE)以及在2分钟的KE MVC结束时进行一次,并且在恢复的8分钟内再进行5次。评估了相对(组内相关系数;ICC)和绝对(重复性系数)可靠性以及变异性(变异系数)。使用广义估计方程测试疲劳诱导的肌肉放松速率变化的时间过程。在未疲劳的KE中,两种技术的峰值放松速率变异系数和重复性系数相似。TMS和股神经刺激的峰值放松速率的平均(95%CI)ICC分别为0.933(0.724 - 0.982)和0.889(0.603 - 0.968)。TMS诱导的标准化肌肉放松速率在PRE时为 - 11.5±2.5秒,下降至 - 6.9±1.2秒( - 37±17%,P < 0.001),并在运动后2分钟恢复。静息抽搐的标准化峰值放松速率未显示出疲劳诱导的变化。在疲劳的KE运动期间,两种技术确定的肌肉放松速率变化不同。TMS提供了可靠的肌肉放松速率值。此外,它足够敏感,并且比股神经刺激诱发的静息抽搐更适合揭示KE中疲劳诱导的变化。