• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创技术在阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术中的应用

Utility of Minimally Invasive Technology for Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer.

作者信息

Nabavizadeh Reza, Petrinec Benjamin, Necchi Andrea, Tsaur Igor, Albersen Maarten, Master Viraj

机构信息

Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 3;9(8):2501. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082501.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9082501
PMID:32756502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7465352/
Abstract

Our aim is to review the benefits as well as techniques, surgical outcomes, and complications of minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) for penile cancer. The PubMed, Wiley Online Library, and Science Direct databases were reviewed in March 2020 for relevant studies limited to those published in English and within 2000-2020. Thirty-one articles describing minimally invasive ILND were identified for review. ILND has an important role in both staging and treatment of penile cancer. Minimally invasive technologies have been utilized to perform ILND in penile cancer patients with non-palpable inguinal lymph nodes and intermediate to high-risk primary tumors or patients with unilateral palpable non-fixed inguinal lymph nodes measuring less than 4 cm, including videoscopic endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and robotic videoscopic endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (RVEIL). Current data suggest that VEIL and RVEIL are feasible and safe with minimal intra-operative complications. Perhaps the strongest appeal for the use of minimally-invasive approaches is their faster post-operative recovery and less post-operative complications. As a result, patients can tolerate this procedure better and surgeons can offer surgery to patients who otherwise would not be a candidate or personally willing to undergo surgery. When compared to open technique, VEIL and RVEIL have similar dissected nodal count, a surrogate metric for oncological adequacy, and a none-inferior inguinal recurrence rate. Larger randomized studies are encouraged to investigate long-term outcome and survival rates using these minimally-invasive techniques for ILND.

摘要

我们的目的是回顾微创腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(ILND)治疗阴茎癌的益处、技术、手术结果及并发症。2020年3月检索了PubMed、Wiley Online Library和Science Direct数据库,纳入2000年至2020年期间发表的英文相关研究。共筛选出31篇描述微创ILND的文章进行综述。ILND在阴茎癌的分期和治疗中均具有重要作用。微创技术已被用于对腹股沟淋巴结不可触及且原发肿瘤为中高危或单侧可触及、不固定且直径小于4 cm腹股沟淋巴结的阴茎癌患者进行ILND,包括视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(VEIL)和机器人视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(RVEIL)。目前的数据表明,VEIL和RVEIL可行且安全,术中并发症极少。使用微创方法的最大吸引力可能在于其术后恢复更快、术后并发症更少。因此,患者对该手术的耐受性更好,外科医生也能够为那些原本不符合条件或不愿意接受手术的患者提供手术。与开放手术相比,VEIL和RVEIL的清扫淋巴结数量相似,这是衡量肿瘤学充分性的替代指标,且腹股沟复发率不劣于开放手术。鼓励开展更大规模的随机研究,以调查使用这些微创技术进行ILND的长期结果和生存率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/2360d2aa3fa6/jcm-09-02501-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/5a7716fe08d5/jcm-09-02501-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/5ae1bd423a3f/jcm-09-02501-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/fc1fbc40aa76/jcm-09-02501-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/e3f5cf349eca/jcm-09-02501-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/912c8ee06e00/jcm-09-02501-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/2360d2aa3fa6/jcm-09-02501-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/5a7716fe08d5/jcm-09-02501-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/5ae1bd423a3f/jcm-09-02501-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/fc1fbc40aa76/jcm-09-02501-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/e3f5cf349eca/jcm-09-02501-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/912c8ee06e00/jcm-09-02501-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/608c/7465352/2360d2aa3fa6/jcm-09-02501-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Utility of Minimally Invasive Technology for Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer.微创技术在阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术中的应用
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 3;9(8):2501. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082501.
2
Inguinal lymph node dissection in the era of minimally invasive surgical technology.微创外科技术时代的腹股沟淋巴结清扫术。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Jan;41(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.026. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Minimally Invasive Procedures for Surgical Inguinal Nodal Staging in Penile Carcinoma.系统评价和荟萃分析微创手术在阴茎癌外科腹股沟淋巴结分期中的应用。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jul;10(4):567-580. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.11.010. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
4
Minimally invasive approaches to the inguinal nodes in cN0 patients.在 cN0 患者中采用微创方法处理腹股沟淋巴结。
Curr Opin Urol. 2019 Mar;29(2):165-172. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000588.
5
Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.阴茎癌的淋巴结管理。
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.001.
6
Comparative study of perioperative and survival outcomes after video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and open inguinal lymph node dissection (O-ILND) in the management of inguinal lymph nodes in carcinoma of the penis.视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术 (VEIL) 与开放腹股沟淋巴结清扫术 (O-ILND) 治疗阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结的围手术期和生存结局的比较研究。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01189-x. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
7
Simultaneous Bilateral Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Penile Carcinoma: Surgical Setting, Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Oncological Outcomes.阴茎癌同步双侧视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:手术背景、可行性、安全性及初步肿瘤学结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 23;12(23):7272. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237272.
8
Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?对于阴茎癌患者,视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的发病率会低于开放性淋巴结清扫术吗?
J Endourol. 2008 Aug;22(8):1687-91. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0386.
9
Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in the Management of Penile Carcinoma.微创腹股沟淋巴结清扫术在阴茎癌治疗中的应用
Urology. 2017 Aug;106:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
Minimal invasive approaches in lymph node management of carcinoma of penis: A review.阴茎癌淋巴结处理中的微创方法:综述
Indian J Urol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):15-21. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_387_21. Epub 2022 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and safety of the Lymphatic Superficial Iliac Artery Perforator (L-SCIP) flap following inguinal lymph node dissection in reducing postoperative complications in patients with cancer.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后采用浅髂动脉穿支淋巴管(L-SCIP)皮瓣减少癌症患者术后并发症的可行性和安全性。
JPRAS Open. 2025 Apr 16;44:511-523. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.04.008. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Simultaneous Bilateral Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Penile Carcinoma: Surgical Setting, Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Oncological Outcomes.阴茎癌同步双侧视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:手术背景、可行性、安全性及初步肿瘤学结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 23;12(23):7272. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237272.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of clinical feasibility and oncological outcomes between video endoscopic and open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阴茎癌的视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术与开放腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的临床可行性及肿瘤学结局比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15862. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015862.
2
Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review.机器人辅助腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0823-4. Epub 2018 May 5.
3
Comparing Outcomes of Robotic and Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carcinoma of the Penis.
Comparison of antegrade robotic assisted VS laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.
机器人辅助经腹与腹腔镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌的比较。
BMC Surg. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01935-6.
4
Assessment and Reporting of Perioperative Adverse Events and Complications in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Melanoma, Vulvar Cancer, and Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.黑色素瘤、外阴癌和阴茎癌患者腹股沟淋巴结清扫围手术期不良事件和并发症的评估与报告:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2023 Apr;47(4):962-974. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06882-6. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
比较机器人与开放式腹股沟淋巴结清扫术在阴茎癌患者中的疗效。
J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1518-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.061. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
4
Usage and survival implications of surgical staging of inguinal lymph nodes in intermediate- to high-risk, clinical localized penile cancer: A propensity-score matched analysis.中高危临床局限性阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结手术分期的应用及生存影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Urol Oncol. 2018 Apr;36(4):159.e7-159.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
5
Comparison of Efficiency of Video Endoscopy and Open Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection.视频内镜检查与开放性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的效率比较
Anticancer Res. 2017 Aug;37(8):4623-4628. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11863.
6
Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in the Management of Penile Carcinoma.微创腹股沟淋巴结清扫术在阴茎癌治疗中的应用
Urology. 2017 Aug;106:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
7
Vulvar Cancer, Version 1.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.外阴癌临床实践指南(2017 年第 1 版),NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Jan;15(1):92-120. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0008.
8
Prospective study comparing video-endoscopic radical inguinal lymph node dissection (VEILND) with open radical ILND (OILND) for penile cancer over an 8-year period.一项前瞻性研究,在8年时间里比较视频内镜下根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(VEILND)与开放性根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(OILND)治疗阴茎癌的效果。
BJU Int. 2017 Apr;119(4):530-534. doi: 10.1111/bju.13660. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
9
Robot-Assisted Simultaneous Bilateral Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Along with Robotic Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Feasibility Study.机器人辅助同步双侧根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术联合机器人双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术:一项可行性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):845-849. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0611. Epub 2016 May 31.
10
Feasibility, complications and oncologic results of a limited inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of penile cancer.阴茎癌治疗中腹股沟淋巴结有限清扫术的可行性、并发症及肿瘤学结果
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 May-Jun;41(3):486-95. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0304.