• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴茎癌淋巴结处理中的微创方法:综述

Minimal invasive approaches in lymph node management of carcinoma of penis: A review.

作者信息

Kandasamy Shreedhar Gurunathan, Chandran Kosur Ravi, Pooleri Ginil Kumar

机构信息

Department of Urology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Indian J Urol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):15-21. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_387_21. Epub 2022 Jan 1.

DOI:10.4103/iju.iju_387_21
PMID:35136290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8796758/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is an integral part in the management of carcinoma penis. The concerns about the postoperative morbidity associated with open ILND led to modification in the template of dissection and adoption of minimally invasive techniques such as video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and robotic-assisted VEIL (R-VEIL). In this review, we aim to describe the techniques, case selection, perioperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes of VEIL and R-VEIL and to compare it with open ILND.

METHODS

Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched to identify the articles for VEIL and R-VEIL. Using PRISMA guidelines, literature search yielded 3783 articles, of which 32 full-text articles relevant to the topic were selected and reviewed, after consensus from authors.

RESULTS

After the first description of VEIL, various modifications in port placements and approaches were described. Several studies have shown, VEIL and R VEIL are safe and feasible in both node-negative and node-positive Ca penis patients. Compared to open ILND, VEIL had fewer wound infections and skin necrosis, minimal blood loss, shorter mean hospital stays, and reduced duration of drain kept. There is no difference in mean lymph node yield and recurrence rates between open ILND, VEIL, R-VEIL.

CONCLUSION

VEIL and R-VEIL are safe and have comparable oncological outcomes with open ILND.

摘要

引言

腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(ILND)是阴茎癌治疗的一个重要组成部分。对开放性ILND术后发病率的担忧促使人们对清扫模板进行了改进,并采用了微创技术,如视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术(VEIL)和机器人辅助VEIL(R-VEIL)。在本综述中,我们旨在描述VEIL和R-VEIL的技术、病例选择、围手术期结果和肿瘤学结果,并将其与开放性ILND进行比较。

方法

检索PubMed、Embase和谷歌学术数据库,以确定有关VEIL和R-VEIL的文章。根据PRISMA指南,文献检索共获得3783篇文章,经作者协商一致后,从中筛选出32篇与该主题相关的全文文章进行综述。

结果

在首次描述VEIL之后,人们又描述了端口放置和手术入路的各种改进。多项研究表明,VEIL和R-VEIL在阴茎癌淋巴结阴性和阳性患者中都是安全可行的。与开放性ILND相比,VEIL的伤口感染和皮肤坏死较少,出血量极少,平均住院时间较短,引流时间缩短。开放性ILND、VEIL、R-VEIL之间的平均淋巴结收获量和复发率没有差异。

结论

VEIL和R-VEIL是安全的,其肿瘤学结果与开放性ILND相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febc/8796758/06115c023435/IJU-38-15-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febc/8796758/cf1d5454b509/IJU-38-15-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febc/8796758/06115c023435/IJU-38-15-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febc/8796758/cf1d5454b509/IJU-38-15-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/febc/8796758/06115c023435/IJU-38-15-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimal invasive approaches in lymph node management of carcinoma of penis: A review.阴茎癌淋巴结处理中的微创方法:综述
Indian J Urol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):15-21. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_387_21. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
2
Comparative study of perioperative and survival outcomes after video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and open inguinal lymph node dissection (O-ILND) in the management of inguinal lymph nodes in carcinoma of the penis.视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术 (VEIL) 与开放腹股沟淋巴结清扫术 (O-ILND) 治疗阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结的围手术期和生存结局的比较研究。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01189-x. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
3
Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(RAVEIL)与视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(VEIL)对比开放性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(OILND)治疗阴茎癌:围手术期结果、并发症及肿瘤学结果的比较。一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Mar;40(3):112.e11-112.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Minimally Invasive Procedures for Surgical Inguinal Nodal Staging in Penile Carcinoma.系统评价和荟萃分析微创手术在阴茎癌外科腹股沟淋巴结分期中的应用。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jul;10(4):567-580. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.11.010. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
5
Utility of Minimally Invasive Technology for Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer.微创技术在阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术中的应用
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 3;9(8):2501. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082501.
6
Simultaneous Bilateral Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Penile Carcinoma: Surgical Setting, Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Oncological Outcomes.阴茎癌同步双侧视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:手术背景、可行性、安全性及初步肿瘤学结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 23;12(23):7272. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237272.
7
Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in the Management of Penile Carcinoma.微创腹股沟淋巴结清扫术在阴茎癌治疗中的应用
Urology. 2017 Aug;106:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
8
Comparison of clinical feasibility and oncological outcomes between video endoscopic and open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.阴茎癌的视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术与开放腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的临床可行性及肿瘤学结局比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15862. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015862.
9
Inguinal lymph node dissection in the era of minimally invasive surgical technology.微创外科技术时代的腹股沟淋巴结清扫术。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Jan;41(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.026. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
10
Bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy using simultaneous double laparoscopies for penile cancer: A retrospective study.双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术同期双腹腔镜治疗阴茎癌:回顾性研究。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Mar;40(3):112.e1-112.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.12.022. Epub 2022 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Author reply Re: Kandasamy SG, Chandran KR, Pooleri GK. Minimal invasive approaches in lymph node management of carcinoma of penis: A review. Indian J Urol. 2022;38:15-21.作者回复 关于:Kandasamy SG, Chandran KR, Pooleri GK. 阴茎癌淋巴结处理中的微创方法:综述。《印度泌尿外科杂志》。2022年;38:15 - 21。
Indian J Urol. 2022 Jul-Sep;38(3):241. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_133_22. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative study of perioperative and survival outcomes after video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and open inguinal lymph node dissection (O-ILND) in the management of inguinal lymph nodes in carcinoma of the penis.视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术 (VEIL) 与开放腹股沟淋巴结清扫术 (O-ILND) 治疗阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结的围手术期和生存结局的比较研究。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01189-x. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
2
Laparoscopic and robotic video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy by the lateral approach.腹腔镜和机器人经侧方入路视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结切除术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jul;14(3):464-469. doi: 10.1111/ases.12898. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
3
Technical caveats in robot assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection - evolution of a modified technique.
机器人辅助视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的技术要点——改良技术的演变
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):216-217. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0298.
4
Profile of patients with penile cancer in the region with the highest worldwide incidence.全球发病率最高地区的阴茎癌患者特征。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 19;10(1):2965. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59831-5.
5
Short-Term Surgical Outcomes of Standard and Lateral Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy: A Multinational Retrospective Study.标准与侧方视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的短期手术结果:一项多国回顾性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Apr;30(4):373-377. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0733. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: a retrospective controlled study.机器人辅助腹腔镜顺行与开放腹股沟淋巴结清扫术:一项回顾性对照研究。
BMC Urol. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0571-4.
7
Cannula-Assisted Port Placement during Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL)-a Novel and Safe Technique.视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(VEIL)中套管辅助的端口置入——一种新颖且安全的技术
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;10(3):570-573. doi: 10.1007/s13193-019-00902-z. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Lateral Approach-Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (L-VEIL) over Open Inguinal Block Dissection: a Retrospective Study.经外侧入路-视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(L-VEIL)与开放性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的疗效及安全性比较:一项回顾性研究
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;10(3):555-562. doi: 10.1007/s13193-019-00951-4. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
9
Incidence of penile cancer worldwide: systematic review and meta-analysis.全球阴茎癌发病率:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 Nov 30;41:e117. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.117. eCollection 2017.
10
Initial experience of video endoscopic inguinal Lymphadenectomy in a center located at northeast brazilian region.巴西东北部某中心行视频内镜腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的初步经验。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Mar-Apr;45(2):325-331. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0521.