• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动监测局限性前列腺癌患者的初级和二级治疗率:基于人群的队列研究。

Rates of primary and secondary treatments for patients on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer-A population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2020 Oct;9(19):6946-6953. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3341. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.3341
PMID:32757442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7541139/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rate of primary and secondary treatment while on active surveillance (AS) for localized prostate cancer at the general population level is unknown. Our objective was to determine the patterns of secondary treatments after primary surgery or radiation for patients who undergo AS.

METHODS

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of men aged 50-80 years old in Ontario, Canada, between 2008 and 2016. We identified 26 742 patients with prostate cancer, a Gleason grade score ≤7, and an index prostate-specific antigen ≤10 ng/mL. Patients were categorized as undergoing AS with or without delayed primary treatment (DT; treatment >6 months after diagnosis) versus immediate treatment (IT; treatment ≤6 months). Patients receiving DT and IT were propensity score matched and the rate of secondary treatment (surgery or radiation ± androgen deprivation treatment) was compared using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We identified 10 214 patients who underwent AS and 11 884 patients who underwent IT. Among patients undergoing AS, 3724 (36.5%) eventually underwent DT and among them, 406 (10.9%) underwent secondary treatment. The median time to DT was 1.2 years (IQR 0.5-8.1 years). The relative rate of undergoing secondary treatment was similar in the DT vs IT group (HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.79-1.08). The risk of death in the DT group was higher compared to patients who did not undergo treatment (HR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.01-1.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with localized prostate cancer on AS, one third undergo DT. The rate of secondary treatment was similar between the DT and IT groups. Patients in the DT group may experience a higher risk of mortality compared to those who remained on AS.

摘要

背景

在一般人群中,接受主动监测(AS)的局限性前列腺癌患者进行初级和二级治疗的比例尚不清楚。我们的目的是确定接受 AS 的患者接受初级手术后或放疗后进行二级治疗的模式。

方法

这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2008 年至 2016 年期间加拿大安大略省 50-80 岁的男性患者。我们共确定了 26742 名前列腺癌患者,其 Gleason 评分≤7,指数前列腺特异性抗原≤10ng/ml。患者分为接受 AS 治疗(有或无延迟初级治疗(DT;诊断后>6 个月治疗)或立即治疗(IT;治疗≤6 个月)。接受 DT 和 IT 的患者进行倾向评分匹配,并使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较二级治疗(手术或放疗+雄激素剥夺治疗)的发生率。

结果

我们确定了 10214 名接受 AS 治疗的患者和 11884 名接受 IT 治疗的患者。在接受 AS 治疗的患者中,3724 名(36.5%)最终接受 DT,其中 406 名(10.9%)接受了二级治疗。DT 的中位时间为 1.2 年(IQR 0.5-8.1 年)。DT 组和 IT 组的二级治疗相对发生率相似(HR 0.92;95%CI:0.79-1.08)。与未接受治疗的患者相比,DT 组的死亡风险更高(HR 1.23,95%CI:1.01-1.49)。

结论

在接受 AS 治疗的局限性前列腺癌患者中,有三分之一接受 DT。DT 组和 IT 组的二级治疗发生率相似。与继续接受 AS 治疗的患者相比,DT 组的患者可能面临更高的死亡风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1646/7541139/1e921306f7a1/CAM4-9-6946-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1646/7541139/b20f88892313/CAM4-9-6946-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1646/7541139/1e921306f7a1/CAM4-9-6946-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1646/7541139/b20f88892313/CAM4-9-6946-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1646/7541139/1e921306f7a1/CAM4-9-6946-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Rates of primary and secondary treatments for patients on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer-A population-based cohort study.主动监测局限性前列腺癌患者的初级和二级治疗率:基于人群的队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2020 Oct;9(19):6946-6953. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3341. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
2
Oncologic Outcomes of Definitive Treatments for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer After a Period of Active Surveillance.主动监测后低危和中危前列腺癌确定性治疗的肿瘤学结果。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Apr;16(2):e425-e435. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
3
Mortality and Androgen Deprivation Therapy as Salvage Treatment for Biochemical Recurrence after Primary Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.死亡率与雄激素剥夺疗法作为临床局限性前列腺癌初始治疗后生化复发的挽救性治疗手段
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1448-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.086. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
4
Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer: The End of Overtreatment?前列腺癌手术治疗方式的变化趋势:过度治疗的终结?
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):175-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
5
Population-Based Assessment of Determining Treatments for Prostate Cancer.基于人群的前列腺癌治疗方法评估。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):60-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.192.
6
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.局限性前列腺癌的治疗:根据其自然病程(通常进展相对缓慢),可选择观察等待、手术或放射治疗。
Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8.
7
Pathologic Outcomes in Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer: Comparative Analysis of Men Electing Active Surveillance and Immediate Surgery.低危前列腺癌的病理结果:选择主动监测与立即手术的男性患者的比较分析。
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):576-581. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.032. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
8
Factors associated with initial treatment and survival for clinically localized prostate cancer: results from the CDC-NPCR Patterns of Care Study (PoC1).与临床局限性前列腺癌初始治疗和生存相关的因素:来自疾病预防控制中心-国家癌症监测、流行病学和结果数据库(NPCR)模式研究(PoC1)的结果。
BMC Cancer. 2010 Apr 19;10:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-152.
9
Work-up and treatment of prostate cancer before and after publication of the first national guidelines on prostate cancer care in Sweden.瑞典发布首份全国前列腺癌护理指南前后前列腺癌的检查与治疗
Scand J Urol. 2018 Aug;52(4):277-284. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1512650. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
10
Differential Risk of Castration Resistance After Initial Radical Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌初次根治性前列腺切除术或放疗后去势抵抗的差异风险
Anticancer Res. 2017 Oct;37(10):5631-5637. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11998.

引用本文的文献

1
MR Imaging in Real Time Guiding of Therapies in Prostate Cancer.磁共振成像在前列腺癌治疗实时引导中的应用
Life (Basel). 2022 Feb 17;12(2):302. doi: 10.3390/life12020302.
2
Treatment in the absence of disease reclassification among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.在对前列腺癌主动监测的男性中,不重新分类疾病的情况下进行治疗。
Cancer. 2022 Jan 15;128(2):269-274. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33911. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The Movember Foundation's GAP3 cohort: a profile of the largest global prostate cancer active surveillance database to date.Movember 基金会的 GAP3 队列:迄今为止全球最大的前列腺癌主动监测数据库概况。
BJU Int. 2018 May;121(5):737-744. doi: 10.1111/bju.14106. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
2
The uptake of active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer: A population-based analysis.前列腺癌管理中主动监测的采用情况:基于人群的分析。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 Sep-Oct;10(9-10):333-338. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3684.
3
10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.
局限性前列腺癌监测、手术或放疗 10 年后的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Stricter Active Surveillance Criteria for Prostate Cancer do Not Result in Significantly Better Outcomes: A Comparison of Contemporary Protocols.更严格的前列腺癌主动监测标准并未带来显著更好的结果:对当代方案的比较。
J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1645-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.083. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
5
A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.PRIAS 研究中的十年主动监测:更新和评估推荐转为主动治疗的标准。
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
6
Long-term Results of Active Surveillance in the Göteborg Randomized, Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.哥德堡随机、基于人群的前列腺癌筛查试验中主动监测的长期结果。
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):760-766. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.048. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
7
Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.一项针对低危前列腺癌的前瞻性主动监测计划的中期和长期结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3379-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.5764. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
8
Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: Guideline recommendations.局限性前列腺癌管理的主动监测:指南推荐
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 May-Jun;9(5-6):171-8. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2806.
9
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Factors Determining Change to Radical Treatment in Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer.系统评价和荟萃分析:决定局部前列腺癌主动监测中根治性治疗改变的因素。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):993-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer.前列腺癌大型主动监测队列患者的长期随访。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):272-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1192. Epub 2014 Dec 15.