Laurence Klotz, Danny Vesprini, Perakaa Sethukavalan, Vibhuti Jethava, Liying Zhang, Suneil Jain, Toshihiro Yamamoto, and Andrew Loblaw, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto; and Alexandre Mamedov, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):272-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1192. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
Active surveillance is increasingly accepted as a treatment option for favorable-risk prostate cancer. Long-term follow-up has been lacking. In this study, we report the long-term outcome of a large active surveillance protocol in men with favorable-risk prostate cancer.
In a prospective single-arm cohort study carried out at a single academic health sciences center, 993 men with favorable- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were managed with an initial expectant approach. Intervention was offered for a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time of less than 3 years, Gleason score progression, or unequivocal clinical progression. Main outcome measures were overall and disease-specific survival, rate of treatment, and PSA failure rate in the treated patients.
Among the 819 survivors, the median follow-up time from the first biopsy is 6.4 years (range, 0.2 to 19.8 years). One hundred forty-nine (15%) of 993 patients died, and 844 patients are alive (censored rate, 85.0%). There were 15 deaths (1.5%) from prostate cancer. The 10- and 15-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates were 98.1% and 94.3%, respectively. An additional 13 patients (1.3%) developed metastatic disease and are alive with confirmed metastases (n = 9) or have died of other causes (n = 4). At 5, 10, and 15 years, 75.7%, 63.5%, and 55.0% of patients remained untreated and on surveillance. The cumulative hazard ratio for nonprostate-to-prostate cancer mortality was 9.2:1.
Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer is feasible and seems safe in the 15-year time frame. In our cohort, 2.8% of patients have developed metastatic disease, and 1.5% have died of prostate cancer. This mortality rate is consistent with expected mortality in favorable-risk patients managed with initial definitive intervention.
主动监测作为低危前列腺癌的一种治疗选择已被广泛接受。但长期随访数据缺乏。本研究报告了一项针对低危前列腺癌患者的大型主动监测方案的长期结果。
在一项单中心前瞻性单臂队列研究中,993 名低危或中危前列腺癌患者接受了初始期待治疗。对于 PSA 倍增时间<3 年、Gleason 评分进展或明确临床进展的患者,建议进行干预。主要观察终点为总生存、疾病特异性生存、治疗率和治疗患者的 PSA 失败率。
在 819 名存活者中,从首次活检到中位随访时间为 6.4 年(范围 0.2 至 19.8 年)。993 例患者中有 149 例(15%)死亡,844 例存活(删失率 85.0%)。有 15 例(1.5%)死于前列腺癌。10 年和 15 年的累积生存率分别为 98.1%和 94.3%。另有 13 例(1.3%)患者发生转移性疾病,且有 9 例患者经证实转移,4 例患者死于其他原因。在 5、10 和 15 年时,75.7%、63.5%和 55.0%的患者未接受治疗,仍处于监测中。非前列腺癌至前列腺癌死亡率的累积风险比为 9.2:1。
低危前列腺癌的主动监测在 15 年的时间框架内是可行且安全的。在我们的队列中,2.8%的患者发生了转移性疾病,1.5%的患者死于前列腺癌。这一死亡率与初始确定性干预治疗的低危患者的预期死亡率一致。