Rehabilitation Department, Gerencia de Atención Integrada de Talavera de la Reina (SESCAM), Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain.
Facultad de Fisioterapia y Enfermería, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
Clin Rehabil. 2021 Jan;35(1):114-118. doi: 10.1177/0269215520947596. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
To compare the correlation of Visual Analog Scale with pain subsections of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Constant-Murley Score in subacromial pain syndrome patients.
Single cross-sectional analysis.
Hospital Rehabilitation Department.
The assessment tools were applied at baseline. Correlations between Visual Analog Scale, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Constant-Murley Score pain subsections were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient. Linear regression models were calculated between scales. Statistical significance was set at two-sided < 0.05.
Forty-three patients were included. Pearson's correlation between assessments was for Visual Analog Scale-Shoulder Pain Disability Index-pain ( = 0.61, < 0.001) and for Visual Analog Scale-Constant Murley Score-pain were ( = -0.74, < 0.001). Visual Analog Scale-Shoulder Pain and Disability Index-pain determination coefficient was = 0.37 and = 0.54 for Visual Analog Scale-Constant-Murley Score-pain.
Visual Analog Scale showed better correlation with Constant Murley Score-pain than with Shoulder Pain and Disability Index-pain in subacromial pain syndrome patients.
比较视觉模拟评分与肩痛和残疾指数及 Constant-Murley 评分中疼痛分项在肩峰下疼痛综合征患者中的相关性。
单横断面分析。
医院康复科。
在基线时应用评估工具。通过 Pearson 相关系数评估视觉模拟评分与肩痛和残疾指数及 Constant-Murley 评分疼痛分项之间的相关性。计算各量表间的线性回归模型。双侧 < 0.05 为有统计学意义。
共纳入 43 例患者。视觉模拟评分与肩痛和残疾指数疼痛分项( = 0.61, < 0.001)及视觉模拟评分与 Constant Murley 评分疼痛分项( = -0.74, < 0.001)之间的 Pearson 相关性较好。视觉模拟评分与肩痛和残疾指数疼痛分项的决定系数为 = 0.37,与 Constant-Murley 评分疼痛分项的决定系数为 = 0.54。
在肩峰下疼痛综合征患者中,视觉模拟评分与 Constant Murley 评分疼痛分项的相关性优于与肩痛和残疾指数疼痛分项的相关性。