Suppr超能文献

医疗保健项目改进设计:高校教师的专业能力。

Health Care Project Improvement Design: Proficiency Among University Faculty.

机构信息

University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX University of Texas at Arlington, TX.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2021;36(4):209-214. doi: 10.1177/1062860620945024.

Abstract

The purpose was to measure faculty members': (1) knowledge of quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS), (2) attitudes and beliefs about their own QI skills, and (3) self-efficacy toward participating in, leading, and teaching QIPS. Faculty completed an online survey. Questions assessed demographic and academic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes/beliefs, and self-efficacy. Knowledge was measured using the Quality Improvement Knowledge Assessment Tool-Revised (QIKAT-R). Participants provided free-text responses to questions about clinical scenarios. Almost half of participants (n = 236) self-reported that they were moderately or extremely comfortable with QIPS skills. Few were very (20%) or most (15%) comfortable teaching QIPS. Ninety-one participants attempted the QIKAT-R, and 78 participants completed it. The mean score was 16.6 (SD = 5.6). Despite positive attitudes and beliefs about their own QIPS skills, study results demonstrate a general lack of knowledge among surveyed faculty members. Faculty development efforts are needed to improve proficiency in participating, leading, and teaching QIPS projects.

摘要

目的是衡量教师的

(1)质量改进和患者安全(QIPS)知识,(2)对自己的 QI 技能的态度和信念,以及(3)参与、领导和教授 QIPS 的自我效能感。教师完成了在线调查。问题评估了人口统计学和学术特征、知识、态度/信念和自我效能感。知识是使用质量改进知识评估工具修订版(QIKAT-R)来衡量的。参与者对临床情况的问题提供了自由文本的回答。近一半的参与者(n = 236)自我报告说他们对 QIPS 技能感到中等或非常舒适。很少有人非常(20%)或最(15%)舒适地教授 QIPS。91 名参与者尝试了 QIKAT-R,78 名参与者完成了它。平均得分为 16.6(SD = 5.6)。尽管对自己的 QIPS 技能持有积极的态度和信念,但研究结果表明,被调查教师普遍缺乏知识。需要开展教师发展工作,以提高参与、领导和教授 QIPS 项目的能力。

相似文献

1
Health Care Project Improvement Design: Proficiency Among University Faculty.
Am J Med Qual. 2021;36(4):209-214. doi: 10.1177/1062860620945024.
3
A pilot initiative to enhance quality improvement teaching with simulation.
Clin Teach. 2024 Aug;21(4):e13723. doi: 10.1111/tct.13723. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
4
QIPS CURE: Implementing a Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Curriculum and Resident Experience.
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Aug;12(4):469-477. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00612.1.

引用本文的文献

1
A century of wild bee sampling: historical data and neural network analysis reveal ecological traits associated with species loss.
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Aug;291(2028):20232837. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2837. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Increasing Faculty Participation and Mentorship in Quality Improvement with an Experiential Four-Hour Workshop.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Feb 7;9:23821205221078104. doi: 10.1177/23821205221078104. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

2
Piloting a patient safety and quality improvement co-curriculum.
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2017 Dec 14;7(6):351-357. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2017.1403830. eCollection 2017.
4
Clinical Quality Improvement Curriculum for Faculty in an Academic Medical Center.
Am J Med Qual. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):125-32. doi: 10.1177/1062860614558086. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
5
The Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R).
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1386-91. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000456.
8
The Quality and Safety Educators Academy: fulfilling an unmet need for faculty development.
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):5-12. doi: 10.1177/1062860613484082. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验