• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to measure knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards quality improvement in health professions education: The Beliefs, Attitudes, Skills, and Confidence in Quality Improvement (BASiC-QI) Scale.开发并心理计量评估一种测量卫生专业教育质量改进知识、技能和态度的工具:信念、态度、技能和质量改进信心(BASiC-QI)量表。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Jun;8(3):167-176. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0511-8.
2
Validity evidence for Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R) scores: consequences of rater number and type using neurology cases.质量改进知识应用工具修订版(QIKAT-R)评分的有效性证据:使用神经病学病例的评分者数量和类型的后果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Nov;28(11):925-933. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008689. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
3
Effectiveness of a quality improvement curriculum for medical students.针对医学生的质量改进课程的有效性。
Med Educ Online. 2015 May 8;20:27133. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.27133. eCollection 2015.
4
From Theory to Practice: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Curriculum for Psychiatry Residents.从理论到实践:精神科住院医师质量改进课程的开发与评估
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Jan 30;11:23821205241228200. doi: 10.1177/23821205241228200. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Efficacy of quality improvement and patient safety workshops for students: a pilot study.针对学生的质量改进与患者安全工作坊的效果:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 23;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1982-3.
6
Can first-year medical students acquire quality improvement knowledge prior to substantial clinical exposure? A mixed-methods evaluation of a pre-clerkship curriculum that uses education as the context for learning.一年级医学生能否在大量临床接触之前获得质量改进知识?使用教育作为学习背景的预科课程的混合方法评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):576-582. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007566. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
7
Effect of a quality improvement curriculum on resident knowledge and skills in improvement.质量改进课程对住院医师改进知识和技能的影响。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19(4):351-4. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.033829. Epub 2010 May 31.
8
Validity evidence for a novel instrument assessing medical student attitudes toward instruction in implicit bias recognition and management.评估医学生对隐性偏见识别和管理教学态度的新工具的效度证据。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 12;21(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02640-9.
9
Implementation and evaluation of an elective quality improvement curriculum for preclinical students: a prospective controlled study.临床前学生选修质量改进课程的实施和评估:一项前瞻性对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04047-0.
10
The Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R).修订后的质量改进知识应用工具(QIKAT-R)
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1386-91. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000456.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing Professionalism Through a Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Workshop in Radiation Oncology.通过放射肿瘤学患者安全与质量改进研讨会提升专业素养
Cureus. 2025 Aug 5;17(8):e89445. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89445. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Integrating a quality improvement experiential platform into medical student education.将一个质量改进体验平台整合到医学生教育中。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 6;25(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06709-7.
3
Protocol of randomized-controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of three different interventions to reduce healthcare provider burnout.一项随机对照试验方案,旨在检验三种不同干预措施减轻医疗服务提供者职业倦怠的有效性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):1643. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12131-4.
4
From Theory to Practice: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Curriculum for Psychiatry Residents.从理论到实践:精神科住院医师质量改进课程的开发与评估
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Jan 30;11:23821205241228200. doi: 10.1177/23821205241228200. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Baseline Quality Improvement Capacity of 33 Endocrinology Centers Participating in the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative.参与1型糖尿病交流质量改进协作项目的33个内分泌中心的基线质量改进能力
Clin Diabetes. 2022 Winter;41(1):35-44. doi: 10.2337/cd22-0071. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
6
Development and Testing of the Quality Improvement Self-efficacy Inventory.质量改进自我效能感量表的编制与检验。
West J Nurs Res. 2022 Feb;44(2):159-168. doi: 10.1177/0193945921994158. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
7
Closing the gap: a transatlantic collaboration to foster quality improvement training in graduate entry medical students using applications of QI methodologies to medical education.缩小差距:一项跨大西洋合作,利用质量改进方法在医学教育中的应用,促进本科入学医学生的质量改进培训。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Aug 1;8(3):e000610. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000610. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Can first-year medical students acquire quality improvement knowledge prior to substantial clinical exposure? A mixed-methods evaluation of a pre-clerkship curriculum that uses education as the context for learning.一年级医学生能否在大量临床接触之前获得质量改进知识?使用教育作为学习背景的预科课程的混合方法评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):576-582. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007566. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
2
Education as a context for early engagement in quality improvement.作为早期参与质量改进背景的教育
Med Educ. 2017 Nov;51(11):1164-1165. doi: 10.1111/medu.13453. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Validity and Reliability of a Tool to Assess Quality Improvement Knowledge and Skills in Pediatrics Residents.评估儿科住院医师质量改进知识与技能工具的效度和信度
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Feb;9(1):79-84. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00799.1.
4
Quality Improvement Education for Health Professionals: A Systematic Review.卫生专业人员的质量改进教育:一项系统综述。
Am J Med Qual. 2016 May;31(3):209-16. doi: 10.1177/1062860614566445. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
5
Measuring bias in self-reported data.测量自我报告数据中的偏差。
Int J Behav Healthc Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):320-332. doi: 10.1504/IJBHR.2011.043414.
6
Key characteristics of successful quality improvement curricula in physician education: a realist review.成功的医师教育质量改进课程的关键特征:一个现实主义的综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):77-88. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002846. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
7
The Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R).修订后的质量改进知识应用工具(QIKAT-R)
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1386-91. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000456.
8
Quality improvement in medical education: current state and future directions.医学教育质量改进:现状与未来方向。
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):107-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04154.x.
9
Teaching quality improvement and patient safety to trainees: a systematic review.教学质量改进和患者安全培训:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1425-39. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e2d0c6.
10
Validation of a method to measure resident doctors' reflections on quality improvement.验证一种测量住院医师对质量改进的反思的方法。
Med Educ. 2010 Mar;44(3):248-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03591.x.

开发并心理计量评估一种测量卫生专业教育质量改进知识、技能和态度的工具:信念、态度、技能和质量改进信心(BASiC-QI)量表。

Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to measure knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards quality improvement in health professions education: The Beliefs, Attitudes, Skills, and Confidence in Quality Improvement (BASiC-QI) Scale.

机构信息

Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Jun;8(3):167-176. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0511-8.

DOI:10.1007/s40037-019-0511-8
PMID:31098982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6565662/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Health professionals are increasingly expected to foster and lead initiatives to improve the quality and safety of healthcare. Consequently, health professions education has begun to integrate formal quality improvement (QI) training into their curricula. Few instruments exist in the literature that adequately and reliably assess QI-related competencies in learners without the use of multiple, trained raters in the context of healthcare. This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of the Beliefs, Attitudes, Skills, and Confidence in Quality Improvement (BASiC-QI) instrument, a 30-item self-assessment tool designed to assess knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards QI.

METHODS

Sixty first-year medical student participants completed the BASiC-QI and the Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool (QIKAT-R) prior to and immediately following a QI program that challenged learners to engage QI concepts in the context of their own medical education. Measurement properties of the BASiC-QI tool were explored through an exploratory factor analysis and generalizability study. Convergent validity was examined through correlations between BASiC-QI and QIKAT-R scores.

RESULTS

Psychometric evaluation of BASiC-QI indicated reliability and validity evidence based on internal structure. Analyses also revealed that BASiC-QI scores were positively correlated with the scores from the QIKAT-R, which stands an indicator of convergent validity.

CONCLUSION

BASiC-QI is a multidimensional self-assessment tool that may be used to assess beliefs, attitudes, skills, and confidence towards QI. In comparison with existing instruments, BASiC-QI does not require multiple raters or scoring rubrics, serving as an efficient, reliable assessment instrument for educators to examine the impact of QI curricula on learners.

摘要

简介

健康专业人员越来越被期望培养和领导各项举措,以提高医疗保健的质量和安全性。因此,健康专业教育已经开始将正式的质量改进(QI)培训纳入其课程。在医疗保健背景下,很少有文献中的工具能够在不使用多个经过培训的评分者的情况下,充分可靠地评估学习者的与 QI 相关的能力。本文描述了信念、态度、技能和质量改进信心(BASiC-QI)工具的开发和心理计量学评估,这是一个 30 项自我评估工具,旨在评估对质量改进的知识、技能和态度。

方法

60 名一年级医学生在参加质量改进计划之前和之后完成了 BASiC-QI 和质量改进知识应用工具(QIKAT-R),该计划挑战学习者在自己的医学教育背景下运用 QI 概念。通过探索性因素分析和可概括性研究探讨了 BASiC-QI 工具的测量特性。通过 BASiC-QI 和 QIKAT-R 得分之间的相关性来检验收敛效度。

结果

BASIC-QI 的心理计量学评估表明,基于内部结构的可靠性和有效性证据。分析还表明,BASiC-QI 得分与 QIKAT-R 的得分呈正相关,这表明存在收敛效度。

结论

BASiC-QI 是一个多维的自我评估工具,可用于评估对质量改进的信念、态度、技能和信心。与现有工具相比,BASiC-QI 不需要多个评分者或评分标准,是教育工作者评估质量改进课程对学习者影响的有效、可靠的评估工具。