• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回家吧:区综合医院护士主导的儿科头部损伤临床决策工具的前瞻性队列研究。

Head home: a prospective cohort study of a nurse-led paediatric head injury clinical decision tool at a district general hospital.

机构信息

Paediatric Emergency Department, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, UK

Paediatric Emergency Department, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2020 Nov;37(11):680-685. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208892. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2019-208892
PMID:32759348
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess if a nurse-led application of a paediatric head injury clinical decision tool would be safe compared with current practice.

METHODS

All paediatric (<17 years) patients with head injuries presenting to Frimley Park Emergency Department (ED), England from 1 May to 31 October 2018 were prospectively screened by a nurse using a mandated electronic 'Head Injury Discharge At Triage' questionnaire (HIDATq). We determined which patients underwent CT of brain and whether there was a clinically important intracranial injury or re-presentation to the ED. The negative predictive value of the screening tool was assessed. We determined what proportion of patients could have been sent home from triage using this tool.

RESULTS

Of the 1739 patients screened, 61 had CTs performed due to head injury (six abnormal) with a CT rate of 3.5% and 2% re-presentations. Of the entire cohort, 1052 screened negative. 1 CT occurred in this group showing no abnormalities. Of those screened negative, 349 (33%)/1052 had 'no other injuries' and 543 (52%)/1052 had 'abrasions or lacerations'. HIDATq's negative predictive value for CT was 99.9% (95% CI 99.4% to 99.9%) and 100% (95% CI 99.0% to 100%) for intracranial injury. The positive predictive value of the tool was low. Five patients screened negative and re-presented within 72 hours but did not require CT imaging.

CONCLUSION

A negative HIDATq appears safe in our ED. Potentially 20% (349/1739) of all patients with head injuries presenting to our department could be discharged by nurses at triage with adequate safety netting advice. This increases to 50% (543/1739), if patients with lacerations or abrasions were given advice and discharged at triage. A large multicentre study is required to validate the tool.

摘要

目的

评估与现行做法相比,护士应用小儿头部损伤临床决策工具是否安全。

方法

2018 年 5 月 1 日至 10 月 31 日期间,英国弗里姆利公园急诊部(ED)所有小儿(<17 岁)头部损伤患者均由护士使用强制性电子“分诊时头部损伤出院”问卷(HIDATq)进行前瞻性筛查。我们确定了哪些患者进行了脑部 CT 检查,以及是否存在临床重要的颅内损伤或再次到 ED 就诊。评估了筛查工具的阴性预测值。我们确定了使用该工具可以将多少患者从分诊处送回家。

结果

在 1739 名接受筛查的患者中,有 61 名因头部损伤进行了 CT 检查(6 例异常),CT 率为 3.5%,2%再次出现。在整个队列中,有 1052 名患者筛查结果为阴性。这组中有 1 例 CT 检查结果正常。在筛查结果为阴性的患者中,有 349(33%)/1052 例“无其他损伤”,543(52%)/1052 例“擦伤或撕裂伤”。HIDATq 对 CT 的阴性预测值为 99.9%(95%CI 99.4%至 99.9%),对颅内损伤的阴性预测值为 100%(95%CI 99.0%至 100%)。该工具的阳性预测值较低。有 5 名筛查结果为阴性并在 72 小时内再次出现,但不需要 CT 成像。

结论

在我们的 ED,阴性 HIDATq 似乎是安全的。如果在分诊时给予适当的安全网建议,我们部门就诊的所有头部损伤患者中有 20%(349/1739)可能由护士出院。如果给予擦伤或撕裂伤患者建议并在分诊处出院,则增加到 50%(543/1739)。需要一项大型多中心研究来验证该工具。

相似文献

1
Head home: a prospective cohort study of a nurse-led paediatric head injury clinical decision tool at a district general hospital.回家吧:区综合医院护士主导的儿科头部损伤临床决策工具的前瞻性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Nov;37(11):680-685. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208892. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
2
Head home: implementation during COVID-19 pandemic.回家:COVID-19 大流行期间的实施。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Sep;38(9):692-693. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-211007. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
3
Comparison of Machine Learning Optimal Classification Trees With the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Head Trauma Decision Rules.机器学习最优分类树与儿科急诊护理应用研究网络头部创伤决策规则的比较。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jul 1;173(7):648-656. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1068.
4
Variation in CT use for paediatric head injuries across different types of emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰不同类型急诊科儿童头部外伤 CT 使用的差异。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Nov;37(11):686-689. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209719. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
5
Accuracy of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE head injury decision rules in children: a prospective cohort study.PECARN、CATCH 和 CHALICE 头部损伤决策规则在儿童中的准确性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2017 Jun 17;389(10087):2393-2402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30555-X. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
6
Applicability of the CATCH, CHALICE and PECARN paediatric head injury clinical decision rules: pilot data from a single Australian centre.适用于 CATCH、CHALICE 和 PECARN 儿科头部损伤临床决策规则的研究:来自澳大利亚单一中心的初步数据。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Oct;30(10):790-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201887. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
7
A prospective observational study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules for children presenting to emergency departments after head injuries (protocol): the Australasian Paediatric Head Injury Rules Study (APHIRST).一项前瞻性观察性研究,旨在评估临床决策规则在儿童头部受伤后就诊急诊科时的诊断准确性(方案):澳大利亚儿科头部损伤规则研究(APHIRST)。
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jun 13;14:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-148.
8
Reduction of Computed Tomography Use for Pediatric Closed Head Injury Evaluation at a Nonpediatric Community Emergency Department.非儿科社区急诊部降低儿童闭合性颅脑损伤评估的计算机断层扫描使用率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;26(7):784-795. doi: 10.1111/acem.13666. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
9
A matched-cohort study of pediatric head injuries: collecting data to inform an evidence-based triage assessment.
J Emerg Nurs. 2014 Jan;40(1):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
10
External validation of the New Orleans Criteria (NOC), the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study II (NEXUS II) for CT scanning in pediatric patients with minor head injury in a non-trauma center.在非创伤中心对儿童轻度头部外伤患者进行 CT 扫描时,对新奥尔良标准(NOC)、加拿大 CT 头部规则(CCHR)和国家急诊 X 射线利用研究 II(NEXUS II)进行外部验证。
Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Aug;41(8):971-9. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2032-4. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing paramedic conveyance decisions when attending children with minor head injury: a qualitative study.影响护理人员运送轻微头部受伤儿童决策的因素:一项定性研究
Emerg Med J. 2025 May 22;42(6):352-359. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214467.
2
Which elements of hospital-based clinical decision support tools for the assessment and management of children with head injury can be adapted for use by paramedics in prehospital care? A systematic mapping review and narrative synthesis.基于医院的临床决策支持工具用于评估和管理儿童头部损伤,其中哪些要素可以适用于急救医护人员在院前照护中的使用?系统制图评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 13;14(2):e078363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078363.
3
Head home: implementation during COVID-19 pandemic.
回家:COVID-19 大流行期间的实施。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Sep;38(9):692-693. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-211007. Epub 2021 Jul 21.