• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Head home: implementation during COVID-19 pandemic.回家:COVID-19 大流行期间的实施。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Sep;38(9):692-693. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-211007. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
2
Head home: a prospective cohort study of a nurse-led paediatric head injury clinical decision tool at a district general hospital.回家吧:区综合医院护士主导的儿科头部损伤临床决策工具的前瞻性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Nov;37(11):680-685. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208892. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
Reduction of Computed Tomography Use for Pediatric Closed Head Injury Evaluation at a Nonpediatric Community Emergency Department.非儿科社区急诊部降低儿童闭合性颅脑损伤评估的计算机断层扫描使用率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;26(7):784-795. doi: 10.1111/acem.13666. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
4
Paediatric patients seen in 18 emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic.儿科患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间在 18 个急诊部门就诊。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Dec;37(12):773-777. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210273. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
5
Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System for Children With Minor Blunt Head Trauma Who Are at Nonnegligible Risk for Traumatic Brain Injuries.实施临床决策支持系统对存在非显著颅脑损伤风险的轻度钝性颅脑外伤患儿的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 May;73(5):440-451. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
6
Emergency Department Triage of Traumatic Head Injury Using a Brain Electrical Activity Biomarker: A Multisite Prospective Observational Validation Trial.使用脑电活动生物标志物对创伤性脑损伤进行急诊科分诊:一项多中心前瞻性观察性验证试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):617-627. doi: 10.1111/acem.13175. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
7
Implementation of Drive-Through Testing for COVID-19 Using an External Emergency Department Triage.采用外部急诊分诊实施新冠肺炎(COVID-19)drive-through 检测
J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;59(6):865-871. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.09.037. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.
9
Prevalence of Brain Injuries and Recurrence of Seizures in Children With Posttraumatic Seizures.创伤后癫痫患儿的脑损伤患病率及癫痫复发情况
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):595-605. doi: 10.1111/acem.13168. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
10
Pediatric closed head injuries treated in an observation unit.在观察病房接受治疗的小儿闭合性颅脑损伤
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005 Oct;21(10):639-44. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000181426.25342.a9.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 on paediatric emergency department attendances at four English hospitals.COVID-19 对四家英国医院儿科急诊就诊人次的影响。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Feb;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001345.

本文引用的文献

1
Head home: a prospective cohort study of a nurse-led paediatric head injury clinical decision tool at a district general hospital.回家吧:区综合医院护士主导的儿科头部损伤临床决策工具的前瞻性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Nov;37(11):680-685. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208892. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
2
Where have all the children gone? Decreases in paediatric emergency department attendances at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020.孩子们都去哪儿了?2020年新冠疫情初期儿科急诊科就诊人数的减少。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Jul;105(7):704. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319385. Epub 2020 May 6.

回家:COVID-19 大流行期间的实施。

Head home: implementation during COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Paediatric Emergency Department, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, UK

Emergency Department, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2021 Sep;38(9):692-693. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-211007. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2020-211007
PMID:34289965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8380872/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent research suggests that between 20% and 50% of paediatric head injuries attending our emergency department (ED) could be safely discharged soon after triage, without the need for medical review, using a 'Head Injury Discharge At Triage' tool (HIDAT). We sought to implement this into clinical practice.

METHODS

Paediatric ED triage staff underwent competency-based assessments for HIDAT with all head injury presentations 1 May to 31 October 2020 included in analysis. We determined which patients were discharged using the tool, which underwent CT of the brain and whether there was a clinically important traumatic brain injury or representation to the ED.

RESULTS

Of the 1429 patients screened; 610 (43%) screened negative with 250 (18%) discharged by nursing staff. Of the entire cohort, 32 CTs were performed for head injury concerns (6 abnormal) with 1 CT performed in the HIDAT negative group (normal). Of those discharged using HIDAT, four reattended, two with vomiting (no imaging or admission) and two with minor scalp wound infections. Two patients who screened negative declined discharge under the policy with later medical discharge (no imaging or admission). Paediatric ED attendances were 29% lower than in 2018.

CONCLUSION

We have successfully implemented HIDAT into local clinical practice. The number discharged (18%) is lower than originally described; this is likely multifactorial. The relationship between COVID-19 and paediatric ED attendances is unclear but decreased attendances suggest those for whom the tool was originally designed are not attending ED and may be accessing other medical/non-medical resources.

摘要

背景

最近的研究表明,在我们的急诊科(ED)就诊的儿童头部损伤中,有 20%到 50%可能通过使用“分诊时头部损伤出院”工具(HIDAT)在分诊后不久安全出院,无需医疗审查。我们试图将其应用于临床实践。

方法

儿科 ED 分诊人员接受了 HIDAT 的基于能力的评估,包括 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 10 月 31 日期间所有头部损伤表现的患者。我们确定了使用该工具出院的患者、接受脑部 CT 检查的患者以及是否存在临床重要的创伤性脑损伤或到 ED 的就诊。

结果

在筛选的 1429 名患者中;610 名(43%)筛查结果为阴性,其中 250 名(18%)由护理人员出院。在整个队列中,有 32 例头部损伤就诊行 CT 检查(6 例异常),其中 1 例 HIDAT 阴性组行 CT 检查(正常)。使用 HIDAT 出院的患者中有 4 例再次就诊,其中 2 例因呕吐(无影像学或入院),2 例因头皮小伤口感染。有 2 名筛查结果为阴性的患者根据政策拒绝出院,随后被医学出院(无影像学或入院)。儿科 ED 就诊人数比 2018 年下降了 29%。

结论

我们已经成功地将 HIDAT 应用于当地的临床实践。出院人数(18%)低于最初描述的人数;这可能是多方面的。COVID-19 与儿科 ED 就诊人数的关系尚不清楚,但就诊人数减少表明,该工具最初设计的人群并未前往 ED,可能正在使用其他医疗/非医疗资源。