Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 6;15(8):e0237299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237299. eCollection 2020.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the aviation industry. Existing protocols have relied on scientifically questionable evidence and might not lead to the optimal balance between public health safety and airlines' financial viability.
To explore the implementation feasibility of Thai Airways International protocol from the perspectives of passengers and aircrews.
An online questionnaire survey of passengers and an in-depth interview with aircrews.
Two randomly selected repatriation flights operated by Thai Airways International using Boeing 777 aircraft (TG476 from Sydney and TG492 from Auckland to Bangkok).
377 Thai passengers and 35 aircrews.
The mean age of passengers was 28.14 (95%CI 26.72 to 29.55) years old; 57.03% were female. TG492 passengers were mostly students and significantly younger than that of TG476 (p<0.0001) with comparable flying experience (p = 0.1192). The average body temperature was 36.52 (95%CI 36.48 to 36.55) degrees Celsius. Passengers estimated average physical distances of 1.59 (95%CI 1.48 to 1.70), 1.41 (95%CI 1.29 to 1.53), and 1.26 (95%CI 1.12 to 1.41) meters at check-in, boarding, and in-flight, respectively. Passengers were checked for body temperature during the flight 1.97 (95%CI 1.77 to 2.18) times on average which is significantly more frequent in longer than shorter flight (p<0.0001). Passengers moved around or went to the toilet during the flight 2.00 (95%CI 1.63 to 2.37) and 2.08 (95%CI 1.73 to 2.43) times which are significantly more frequent in longer than shorter flight (p = 0.0186 and 0.0049, respectively). The aircrews were satisfied with the protocol and provided several practical suggestions.
The protocol was well received by the passengers and aircrews of the repatriation flights with some suggestions for improvement.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行影响了航空业。现有的协议依赖于科学上有疑问的证据,可能无法在公众健康安全和航空公司的财务生存能力之间取得最佳平衡。
从乘客和机组人员的角度探讨泰国国际航空公司协议的实施可行性。
对乘客进行在线问卷调查和对机组人员进行深入访谈。
两架随机选择的泰国国际航空公司使用波音 777 飞机(从悉尼出发的 TG476 号和从奥克兰出发的 TG492 号)执飞的包机航班。
377 名泰国乘客和 35 名机组人员。
乘客的平均年龄为 28.14 岁(95%CI 26.72 至 29.55);57.03%为女性。TG492 航班的乘客主要是学生,比 TG476 航班的乘客明显年轻(p<0.0001),飞行经验相当(p = 0.1192)。平均体温为 36.52 摄氏度(95%CI 36.48 至 36.55)。乘客在办理登机手续、登机和飞行中分别估计平均物理距离为 1.59 米(95%CI 1.48 至 1.70)、1.41 米(95%CI 1.29 至 1.53)和 1.26 米(95%CI 1.12 至 1.41)。乘客在飞行过程中平均体温检查 1.97 次(95%CI 1.77 至 2.18),飞行时间较长的航班比飞行时间较短的航班检查频率明显更高(p<0.0001)。乘客在飞行过程中走动或上厕所 2.00 次(95%CI 1.63 至 2.37)和 2.08 次(95%CI 1.73 至 2.43),飞行时间较长的航班比飞行时间较短的航班明显更频繁(p = 0.0186 和 0.0049)。机组人员对该协议表示满意,并提出了一些实际建议。
该协议受到遣返航班乘客和机组人员的欢迎,并提出了一些改进建议。