Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Section of Breast Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
BJS Open. 2020 Oct;4(5):811-820. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50324. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant-based breast reconstructions (IBBRs) aims to improve cosmetic outcomes. Six-month data are presented from a randomized trial evaluating whether IBBR with ADM provides higher health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes compared with conventional IBBR without ADM.
In this multicentre open-label RCT, women with breast cancer planned for mastectomy with immediate IBBR in four centres in Sweden and one in the UK were allocated randomly (1 : 1) to IBBR with or without ADM. HRQoL, a secondary endpoint, was measured as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using three validated instruments (EORTC-QLQC30, QLQ-BR23, QLQ-BRR26) at baseline and 6 months.
Between 24 April 2014 and 10 May 2017, 135 women were enrolled, of whom 64 with and 65 without ADM were included in the final analysis. At 6 months after surgery, patient-reported HRQoL, measured with generic QLQ-C30 or breast cancer-specific QLQ-BR23, was similar between the groups. For patient-reported cosmetic outcomes, two subscale items, cosmetic outcome (8·66, 95 per cent c.i. 0·46 to 16·86; P = 0·041) and problems finding a well-fitting bra (-13·21, -25·54 to -0·89; P = 0·038), yielded higher scores in favour of ADM, corresponding to a small to moderate clinical difference. None of the other 27 domains measured showed any significant differences between the groups.
IBBR with ADM was not superior in terms of higher levels of HRQoL compared with IBBR without ADM. Although two subscale items of patient-reported cosmetic outcomes favoured ADM, the majority of cosmetic items showed no significant difference between treatments at 6 months. Registration number: NCT02061527 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov).
脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)在基于植入物的乳房重建(IBBR)中旨在改善美容效果。呈现了一项随机试验的 6 个月数据,该试验评估了在没有 ADM 的常规 IBBR 中添加 ADM 是否可以提供更高的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和患者报告的美容效果。
在这项多中心开放性 RCT 中,在瑞典的四个中心和英国的一个中心计划接受乳房切除术和即刻 IBBR 的乳腺癌女性被随机(1:1)分配到有或没有 ADM 的 IBBR。HRQoL,一个次要终点,通过使用三个经过验证的工具(EORTC-QLQC30、QLQ-BR23、QLQ-BRR26)在基线和 6 个月时进行患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)进行测量。
2014 年 4 月 24 日至 2017 年 5 月 10 日,共纳入 135 名女性,其中 64 名有 ADM,65 名无 ADM 纳入最终分析。在手术后 6 个月时,两组患者报告的 HRQoL,用通用 QLQ-C30 或乳腺癌特异性 QLQ-BR23 测量,相似。对于患者报告的美容结果,两个亚量表项目,美容结果(8·66,95%置信区间 0·46 至 16·86;P = 0·041)和寻找合适胸罩的问题(-13·21,-25·54 至 -0·89;P = 0·038),ADM 组得分更高,对应于较小到中等的临床差异。在两组之间,没有其他 27 个测量的领域显示出任何显著差异。
与没有 ADM 的 IBBR 相比,ADM 并没有在更高的 HRQoL 水平上更具优势。尽管患者报告的美容结果的两个亚量表项目倾向于 ADM,但在 6 个月时,大多数美容项目在治疗之间没有显示出显著差异。注册号:NCT02061527(www.clinicaltrials.gov)。