Suppr超能文献

基于乳房重建患者满意度和健康状况的 BREAST-Q 调查。

BREAST-Q-Based Survey of the Satisfaction and Health Status of Patients with Breast Reconstruction.

机构信息

Deparment of Plastic Surgery, The first affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university, No. 1 East Construction Road, Jinshui District, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.

Department of Pathology, The people's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2295-2303. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03642-2. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

Abstract

AIMS

To explore the patients' satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients who received reconstruction after breast cancer surgery using the BREAST-Q questionnaire and further investigate the influencing risk factors.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled patients who underwent first-ever breast reconstruction after unilateral or bilateral mastectomy at the Breast Surgery Department of First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University or People's Hospital of Zhengzhou between January 2016 and December 2021. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 202 participants were included. Age of >45 years (vs.≤35 years, β = - 3.74, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor influencing the satisfaction degree score. Age between 36 and 45 years (vs. ≤35 years, β = - 0.26, P < 0.001), age of >45 years (vs. ≤35 years, β = - 0.45, P < 0.001), nipple-preserving mastectomy (NSM)/ skin-preserving mastectomy (SSM) + sentinel lymph node dissection + prosthesis implantation + contralateral breast augmentation (vs. NSM/SSM + sentinel lymph node dissection + prosthesis implantation, β = - 0.16, P=0.012), and the use of small intestinal submucosa (SIS) matrix (β = 0.13, P = 0.044) were independent risk factors influencing the HRQOL scores.

CONCLUSION

Age, the surgical procedure, and the use of matrix were associated with the satisfaction degree and HRQOL after breast reconstruction in patients receiving mastectomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

目的

使用 BREAST-Q 问卷探讨接受乳腺癌手术后重建的患者的满意度和健康相关生活质量(HRQOL),并进一步探讨影响满意度和 HRQOL 的风险因素。

方法

本横断面研究纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月在郑州大学第一附属医院或郑州市人民医院乳腺外科行单侧或双侧乳房切除术的患者。采用多变量线性回归分析来分析风险因素。

结果

共纳入 202 名患者。年龄>45 岁(与≤35 岁相比,β=-3.74,P<0.001)是影响满意度评分的独立危险因素。年龄 36-45 岁(与≤35 岁相比,β=-0.26,P<0.001),年龄>45 岁(与≤35 岁相比,β=-0.45,P<0.001),保乳术(NSM)/保留皮肤的乳房切除术(SSM)+前哨淋巴结活检+假体植入+对侧乳房增大(与 NSM/SSM+前哨淋巴结活检+假体植入相比,β=-0.16,P=0.012),以及使用小肠黏膜下层(SIS)基质(β=0.13,P=0.044)是影响 HRQOL 评分的独立危险因素。

结论

年龄、手术方式和基质的使用与接受乳房切除术的患者乳房重建后的满意度和 HRQOL 相关。

证据等级 II:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266

相似文献

1
BREAST-Q-Based Survey of the Satisfaction and Health Status of Patients with Breast Reconstruction.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2295-2303. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03642-2. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
6
A Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Local Flap and Full-Thickness Skin Graft.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1478-1484. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1162-6. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
7
"Hook Shape" Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction: Technique, Results and Outcomes from a Preliminary Case Series.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Apr;47(2):546-556. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03115-y. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
8
Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Skin-Reducing Mastectomy with Prepectoral Polyuretane (Pu) Implant Covered with an Autologous Dermo-Adipose Flap.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Aug;48(15):2829-2838. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03240-8. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
10
Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1291-1299. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03316-z. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Body image in women diagnosed with breast cancer: A grounded theory study.
Body Image. 2022 Jun;41:417-431. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
Cancer statistics, 2022.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
3
Systematic Review of Breast-Q: A Tool to Evaluate Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2021 Dec 16;13:711-724. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S256393. eCollection 2021.
4
Body image and quality of life in women with breast cancer: Appreciating the body and its functionality.
Body Image. 2022 Mar;40:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
5
[Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Guideline version 2021: updates and interpretations].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 29;101(24):1835-1838. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210421-00954.
6
The impact of age on patient-reported outcomes after oncoplastic versus conventional breast cancer surgery.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jun;187(2):437-446. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06126-6. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
7
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
BREAST-Q Measurement of the Patient Perspective in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Aug 7;6(8):e1904. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001904. eCollection 2018 Aug.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验