Davidson J R, Giller E L, Zisook S, Overall J E
Department of Psychiatry, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Feb;45(2):120-7. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800260024003.
Isocarboxazid and placebo were evaluated in 130 anxious depressives. Drug was superior to placebo on depression, anxiety, interpersonal sensitivity, and global measures, and on symptoms of hostility, anxiety, obsessiveness, and psychological-cognitive components of depression. There were no significant differences between treatment effects on psychomotor and typical vegetative symptoms. Isocarboxazid was more effective than placebo in major, but not in minor, depression. It was significantly more effective in depression classified as endogenous depression or melancholia by various diagnostic criteria. Drug was more effective than placebo in atypical depression with vegetative reversal and in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)-derived profiles of anxious and hostile depression; there were no drug-placebo differences in atypical depression without vegetative reversal, or in BPRS retarded and agitated/excited depression. Interpersonal sensitivity emerged as an important drug-responsive dimension.
对130名焦虑性抑郁症患者进行了异卡波肼和安慰剂的评估。在抑郁、焦虑、人际敏感性和整体测量方面,以及在敌意、焦虑、强迫观念和抑郁的心理认知成分症状方面,药物优于安慰剂。在对精神运动和典型植物神经症状的治疗效果上,两者无显著差异。异卡波肼在重度抑郁症中比安慰剂更有效,但在轻度抑郁症中并非如此。根据各种诊断标准,它在归类为内源性抑郁症或忧郁症的抑郁症中显著更有效。在具有植物神经逆转的非典型抑郁症以及根据简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)得出的焦虑和敌意抑郁症概况中,药物比安慰剂更有效;在没有植物神经逆转的非典型抑郁症,或BPRS迟缓型和激越/兴奋型抑郁症中,药物与安慰剂没有差异。人际敏感性成为一个重要的药物反应维度。