Suppr超能文献

拔除导尿管后使用抗生素预防可预防尿路感染:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Antibiotic prophylaxis after extraction of urinary catheter prevents urinary tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Liu Linhu, Jian Zhongyu, Li Hong, Wang Kunjie

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2021 Feb;49(2):247-254. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.034. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis for consequent urinary tract infections (UTIs) after extraction of urinary catheter and further explore the association between the outcome and clinical characteristics of patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases through March 2020. Studies were included if they inquired into antibiotic prophylaxis for UTIs after extraction of a temporary (≤14 days) urinary catheter. We used fixed-effect models to obtain pooled risk ratio (RR) estimates. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I value. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also conducted to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We finally included 8 randomized controlled trials in our study. Only 2 studies showed that antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the consequent UTIs after extraction of urinary catheters while 6 did not. Overall, antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with reduced UTIs (RR, 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.72, P< .01, I = 31%). Subgroup analysis indicated that patients who are older than 60 (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.76, P< .05, I = 29%) or received Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX; RR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.09-0.48, P< .01, I = 0%) or indwelling catheters for more than 5 days (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.19-0.63, P< .01, I = 0%) could get more benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis after extraction of catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with catheters removed might get benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis as a result of fewer consequent UTIs, and those who have advanced age (over 60 years old) or long-term catheterization (over 5 days) could get more benefit from prophylaxis. And TMP/SMX could be a good choice of prophylaxis for UTIs after extraction of urinary catheters. This approach should apply to high-risk patients (advanced age or long-term catheterization) due to the potential harm of widespread antibacterial agents such as side effects and bacterial resistance.

摘要

目的

探讨拔除导尿管后预防性使用抗生素对后续尿路感染(UTIs)的影响,并进一步探讨该结果与患者临床特征之间的关联。

方法

我们系统检索了截至2020年3月的PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库。纳入的研究需探究拔除临时(≤14天)导尿管后预防性使用抗生素预防UTIs的情况。我们使用固定效应模型来获得合并风险比(RR)估计值。用I值评估异质性。还进行了敏感性分析和亚组分析以评估异质性。

结果

我们的研究最终纳入了8项随机对照试验。只有2项研究表明预防性使用抗生素可降低拔除导尿管后后续UTIs的发生率,而6项研究未发现此效果。总体而言,预防性使用抗生素与UTIs发生率降低相关(RR,0.47,95%置信区间[CI] 0.28 - 0.72,P <.01,I = 31%)。亚组分析表明,年龄大于60岁的患者(RR = 0.50,95% CI:0.33 - 0.76,P <.05,I = 29%)或接受甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑(TMP/SMX;RR = 0.21,95% CI:0.09 - 0.48,P <.01,I = 0%)或留置导尿管超过5天的患者(RR = 0.34,95% CI:0.19 - 0.63,P <.01,I = 0%)在拔除导尿管后预防性使用抗生素可获得更多益处。

结论

拔除导尿管的患者可能因后续UTIs减少而从预防性使用抗生素中获益,年龄较大(60岁以上)或长期留置导尿管(超过5天)的患者从预防中获益更多。并且TMP/SMX可能是拔除导尿管后预防UTIs的良好选择。由于广泛使用抗菌药物存在潜在危害,如副作用和细菌耐药性,这种方法应适用于高危患者(年龄较大或长期留置导尿管)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验