• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国广州启动登革热三级应对措施的早期效果:基于人群的中断时间序列研究。

The effectiveness of early start of Grade III response to dengue in Guangzhou, China: A population-based interrupted time-series study.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Department of Biostatistics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Aug 7;14(8):e0008541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008541. eCollection 2020 Aug.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0008541
PMID:32764758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7444500/
Abstract

In 2019, dengue incidences increased dramatically in many countries. However, the prospective growth in dengue incidence did not occur in Guangzhou, China. We examined the effectiveness of early start of Grade III response to dengue in Guangzhou. We extracted the data on daily number of dengue cases during 2017-2019 in Guangzhou and weekly data for Foshan and Zhongshan from the China National Notifiable Disease Reporting System, while the data on weekly number of positive ovitraps for adult and larval Aedes albopictus were obtained from Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention. We estimated the number of dengue cases prevented by bringing forward the starting time of Grade III response from September in 2017-2018 to August in 2019 in Guangzhou using a quasi-Poisson regression model and applied the Baron and Kenny's approach to explore whether mosquito vector density was a mediator of the protective benefit. In Guangzhou, early start of Grade III response was associated with a decline in dengue incidence (relative risk [RR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.70), with 987 (95% CI: 521-1,593) cases averted in 2019. The rate of positive ovitraps also significantly declined (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.77). Moreover, both mosquito vector density and early start of Grade III response was significantly associated with dengue incidence after adjustment for each other. By comparing with the incidence in Foshan and Zhongshan where the Grade III response has not been taken, benefits from the response starting in August were confirmed but not if starting from September. Early start of Grade III response has effectively mitigated the dengue burden in Guangzhou, China, which might be partially through reducing the mosquito vector density. Our findings have important public health implications for development and implementation of dengue control interventions for Guangzhou and other locations with dengue epidemics.

摘要

2019 年,许多国家的登革热发病率显著上升。然而,中国广州并没有出现预期的登革热发病率增长。我们研究了广州提前启动三级应对措施对登革热的效果。我们从中国国家法定传染病报告系统中提取了 2017-2019 年广州每日登革热病例数据,以及佛山和中山的每周数据,同时从广州疾病预防控制中心获取了成蚊和白纹伊蚊幼虫诱蚊诱卵器每周阳性率数据。我们采用拟泊松回归模型估计了 2019 年将三级应对措施的启动时间从 9 月提前到 8 月,从而预防的登革热病例数,并采用 Baron 和 Kenny 的方法探索蚊虫媒介密度是否为保护效益的中介因素。在广州,提前启动三级应对措施与登革热发病率下降相关(相对风险 [RR]:0.54,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.43-0.70),2019 年可避免 987 例(95%CI:521-1593)病例。诱蚊诱卵器阳性率也显著下降(RR:0.64,95%CI:0.53-0.77)。此外,调整相互作用后,蚊虫媒介密度和三级应对措施的启动时间均与登革热发病率显著相关。与未采取三级应对措施的佛山和中山的发病率相比,证实了 8 月开始实施该措施的获益,但 9 月开始实施则没有获益。提前启动三级应对措施有效地减轻了中国广州的登革热负担,这可能部分是通过降低蚊虫媒介密度实现的。我们的研究结果对广州和其他有登革热疫情地区制定和实施登革热控制干预措施具有重要的公共卫生意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f72/7444500/3ab4afdaefed/pntd.0008541.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f72/7444500/86731377b427/pntd.0008541.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f72/7444500/e2dd65eb5252/pntd.0008541.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f72/7444500/3ab4afdaefed/pntd.0008541.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f72/7444500/86731377b427/pntd.0008541.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f72/7444500/e2dd65eb5252/pntd.0008541.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f72/7444500/3ab4afdaefed/pntd.0008541.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of early start of Grade III response to dengue in Guangzhou, China: A population-based interrupted time-series study.中国广州启动登革热三级应对措施的早期效果:基于人群的中断时间序列研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Aug 7;14(8):e0008541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008541. eCollection 2020 Aug.
2
The dengue preface to endemic in mainland China: the historical largest outbreak by Aedes albopictus in Guangzhou, 2014.中国内地登革热的流行前言:2014 年广州由白纹伊蚊引起的史上最大规模暴发。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Sep 22;6(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0352-9.
3
Photoperiodic diapause in a subtropical population of Aedes albopictus in Guangzhou, China: optimized field-laboratory-based study and statistical models for comprehensive characterization.中国广州亚热带地区白纹伊蚊的光周期滞育:优化的基于野外-实验室的综合特征描述研究和统计模型。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Aug 14;7(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0466-8.
4
Neglected Urban Villages in Current Vector Surveillance System: Evidences in Guangzhou, China.当前病媒生物监测系统中的被忽视城区村落:来自中国广州的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;17(1):2. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010002.
5
The increasing menace of dengue in Guangzhou, 2001-2016: the most important epicenter in mainland China.2001-2016 年广州登革热的日益威胁:中国大陆最重要的震中。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4504-3.
6
Developing a Time Series Predictive Model for Dengue in Zhongshan, China Based on Weather and Guangzhou Dengue Surveillance Data.基于天气和广州登革热监测数据构建中国中山登革热的时间序列预测模型
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Feb 19;10(2):e0004473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004473. eCollection 2016 Feb.
7
Incidence dynamics and investigation of key interventions in a dengue outbreak in Ningbo City, China.中国宁波市登革热疫情的发病动态及关键干预措施的研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Aug 15;13(8):e0007659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007659. eCollection 2019 Aug.
8
Assessing the suitability for Aedes albopictus and dengue transmission risk in China with a delay differential equation model.利用时滞微分方程模型评估白纹伊蚊在中国的适宜性和登革热传播风险。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Mar 26;15(3):e0009153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009153. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Evaluation of the Effects of Vector Indices and Climatic Factors on Dengue Incidence in Gampaha District, Sri Lanka.评估矢量指数和气候因素对斯里兰卡甘帕哈区登革热发病率的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Jan 31;2019:2950216. doi: 10.1155/2019/2950216. eCollection 2019.
10
Identification of Aedes albopictus larval index thresholds in the transmission of dengue in Guangzhou, China.中国广州白纹伊蚊幼虫指数阈值在登革热传播中的识别
J Vector Ecol. 2015 Dec;40(2):240-6. doi: 10.1111/jvec.12160.

引用本文的文献

1
Field investigation combined with modeling uncovers the ecological heterogeneity of Aedes albopictus habitats for strategically improving systematic management during urbanization.现场调查与建模相结合揭示了白纹伊蚊栖息地的生态异质性,为城市化进程中系统管理的战略性改善提供了依据。
Parasit Vectors. 2023 Oct 25;16(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05926-7.
2
Etiology of acute febrile illnesses in Southern China: Findings from a two-year sentinel surveillance project, 2017-2019.中国南方急性发热性疾病的病因:来自 2017-2019 年为期两年的哨点监测项目的结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 28;17(6):e0270586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270586. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Unprecedented rise in dengue outbreaks in Bangladesh.孟加拉国登革热疫情空前激增。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;19(12):1287. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30616-4.
2
A notorious vector-borne disease: Dengue fever, its evolution as public health threat.一种臭名昭著的媒介传播疾病:登革热,其作为公共卫生威胁的演变。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Oct 31;8(10):3125-3129. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_716_19. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Assessing the interplay between human mobility and mosquito borne diseases in urban environments.评估城市环境中人类流动性与蚊子传播疾病之间的相互作用。
Land use and land cover change and its impacts on dengue dynamics in China: A systematic review.
土地利用和土地覆盖变化及其对中国登革热动态的影响:系统评价。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Oct 20;15(10):e0009879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009879. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
The Global Trends and Regional Differences in Incidence of Dengue Infection from 1990 to 2019: An Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990年至2019年登革热感染发病率的全球趋势与地区差异:来自2019年全球疾病负担研究的分析
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Sep;10(3):1625-1643. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00470-2. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 15;9(1):16911. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53127-z.
4
Systematic review of dengue vaccine efficacy.登革热疫苗有效性的系统评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):750. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4369-5.
5
Incidence dynamics and investigation of key interventions in a dengue outbreak in Ningbo City, China.中国宁波市登革热疫情的发病动态及关键干预措施的研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Aug 15;13(8):e0007659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007659. eCollection 2019 Aug.
6
Spatiotemporal Transmission Patterns and Determinants of Dengue Fever: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China.登革热时空传播模式及影响因素:以中国广州为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 12;16(14):2486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142486.
7
Contrasting the value of targeted versus area-wide mosquito control scenarios to limit arbovirus transmission with human mobility patterns based on different tropical urban population centers.对比基于不同热带城市人口中心的人类流动模式,以限制虫媒病毒传播为目标的靶向控制与区域广泛控制情景的价值。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jul 3;13(7):e0007479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007479. eCollection 2019 Jul.
8
The current and future global distribution and population at risk of dengue.当前和未来登革热的全球分布和风险人群。
Nat Microbiol. 2019 Sep;4(9):1508-1515. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0476-8. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
9
Evaluation of intensified dengue control measures with interrupted time series analysis in the Panadura Medical Officer of Health division in Sri Lanka: a case study and cost-effectiveness analysis.斯里兰卡帕纳杜拉卫生官员分区强化登革热控制措施的评价:一项病例研究和成本效益分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 May;3(5):e211-e218. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30057-9.
10
Global expansion and redistribution of Aedes-borne virus transmission risk with climate change.气候变化导致登革热媒介病毒传播风险的全球扩张和重新分布。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Mar 28;13(3):e0007213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007213. eCollection 2019 Mar.